133
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Management of Basic Research and Development: Lessons from the Australian Experience

      Published
      research-article
      , ,
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      Management, innovation, policy, science, research
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Management of science and related basic research and development by the state is not a new phenomenon. In this paper it is argued, on the basis of recent Australian experience, that the conventional approach which assumes that the research community is a simple system is deeply flawed. Specifically, it is argued that any pattern of government funding which assumes linear relationships between funding and scientific outputs is unlikely to be productive. Further, it is suggested that a quantitative approach to research management is counter-productive to innovation. A range of ideas is used in developing a more productive set of policies for basic research and development.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            cpro20
            CPRO
            Prometheus
            Critical Studies in Innovation
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            June 1999
            : 17
            : 2
            : 187-197
            Affiliations
            Article
            8629549 Prometheus, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1999: pp. 187–197
            10.1080/08109029908629549
            0df2dfe0-cbe7-4742-bfcf-23b2ab69f033
            Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 47, Pages: 11
            Categories
            PAPERS

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics
            policy,research,science,innovation,Management

            Notes and References

            1. We would like to thank Dr. Denise Welch (Norwegian Business School, Oslo) for helpful comments during the writing of this paper. The usual disclaimer applies.

            2. In Sam Garrett-Jones, Tim Turpin, Joan Bellavista and Stephen Hill, Using Basic Research: Assessing Connections Between Basic Research and National Socio-Economic Objectives, Commissioned Report No. 36, National Board of Employment, Education, and Training, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1995, p. 39.

            3. Michael Polanyi, The Tacit Dimension, Doubleday, New York, 1966.

            4. Peter Karmel, Reflections on a Revolution, Australian Vice-Chancellor's Committee, Canberra, 1989.

            5. Jurgen Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, Beacon, Boston, 1983, p. 9.

            6. Derek de Solla Price, little Science, Big Science, Columbia University Press, New York, 1963.

            7. Garrett-Jones et al., op. cit.

            8. Department of Employment Education and Training, Higher Education Research Policies and Programs, Briefing Paper Presented to the Higher Education Information Seminar, July 1990, p. 2.

            9. Ibid, p. 8.

            10. Ibid.

            11. Shantha Liyanage and Helen Mitchell, ‘A symbiotic model of innovation management for collaborative research’, Prometheus, 12, 2, 1994, pp. 207–24.

            12. See: Tim Turpin, Sam Garrett-Jones, Nicole Rankin and David Aylward, Patterns of Research Activity in Australian Universities, Commissioned Report No. 47, National Board of Employment, Education, and Training, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1996.

            13. See: Ralph Stacey, Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics, Pitman, London, 1996; and R. Stacey, ‘The science of complexity: an alternative perspective for strategic change processes’, Strategic Management Journal, 16, 1995, pp. 477–95.

            14. Henry Mintzberg, ‘Crafting strategy’, Harvard Business Review, July-August, 1987, pp. 66–75.

            15. Edgar Schein, Organization Culture and Leadership, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, 1992, p. 12.

            16. David Limerick and Brian Cunnington, Managing the New Organisation, Business and Professional, Sydney, 1993, p. 184.

            17. Schein, op. cit., p. 17.

            18. Andrew Inkpen and Nathan Choudhury, ‘The seeking of strategy where it is not: towards a theory of strategy absence’, Strategic Management Journal, 16, 1995, pp. 313–23.

            19. James Quinn and John Voyer, ‘Logical incrementalism: managing strategy formation’, in Henry Mintzberg and James Quinn (eds), The Strategy Process: Concepts, Contexts, and Cases, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1996, pp. 95–101.

            20. Stacey, op. cit., 1996.

            21. Shona Brown and Kathleen Eisenhardt, ‘Product development: past research, present findings, and future directions’, Academy of Management Review, 20, 2, 1995, pp. 343–78.

            22. Paul Bourke, Evaluating University Research: The British Research Assessment Exercise and Australian Practice, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1997.

            23. Ibid.

            24. Ibid.

            25. Donald McCloskey, The Rhetoric of Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, Wisconsin, 1985.

            26. See: Anne Carter, ‘Measuring the performance of a knowledge-based economy’, in OECD Documents: Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-Based Economy, OECD, Paris, 1990; and Donald Lamberton, ‘A crisis for Australian science: the erosion of organizational capital’, Prometheus, 12, 2, 1994, pp. 262–7.

            27. C. Marlene Fiol, ‘Squeezing harder doesn't always work: continuing the search for consistency in innovation research’, Academy of Management Review, 21, 4, 1996, pp. 1012–21.

            28. Joseph Stiglitz, Whither Socialism?, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1996, p. 148.

            29. Carter, op. cit., p. 61.

            30. Fiol, op. cit., p. 1013.

            31. Herbert Simon, ‘Rational decision making in business organisations’, American Economic Review, 69, 1979, pp. 493–513.

            32. McCloskey, op. cit.

            33. Martin Kilduff and Ajay Mehra, ‘Postmodernism and organisational research’, Academy of Management Review, 22, 2, 1997, pp. 453–81.

            34. Polanyi, op. cit.

            35. See: Donald Lamberton, ‘The knowledge-based economy: a sisyphus model’, Prometheus, 15, 1997, pp. 73-81; and Dominique Foray and Bengt-Ake Lundvall, ‘The knowledge-based economy: from the economics of knowledge to the learning economy’, in OECD Documents, Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Paris, OECD, 1996, pp. 11–31.

            36. See: Harold Collins, ‘The TEA set: tacit knowledge and scientific networks’, Social Studies, 4, 1974, pp. 165-86; Ikujiro Nonaka and Hirotaka Takeuchi, The Knowledge-Creating Company, Oxford University Press, New York, 1995; and John Steen, Dallas Hanson and Peter Leisch, ‘Collaborative research and development: new insights from cyclic models of the innovation process’, International Journal of Innovation Management, 2, 1, 1998, pp. 107–21.

            37. Fiol, op. cit.

            38. Wesley Cohen and Daniel Levinthal, ‘Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1990, pp. 128–52.

            39. Paul Bourke and Linda Butler, A Crisis for Australian Science?, Australian National University, Canberra, 1994.

            40. Fiol, op. cit.

            41. Stuart Macdonald and Christine Williams, ‘The informal information network in an age of advanced telecommunications’, Human Systems Management, 11, 1992, pp. 77–87.

            42. see: Collins, op. cit.;, and Harold Collins, ‘The seven sexes: a study in the sociology of a phenomenon, or the replication of experiments in physics’, Sociology, 9, 1975, pp. 205–24.

            43. Lamberton, op. cit., 1994.

            44. Steven Fuller, ‘Social epistemology and the research agenda of science studies’, in A. Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1992, pp. 390–428.

            45. Michael Porter, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Macmillan, London, 1990.

            46. Fuller, op. cit.

            47. Fiol, op. cit., p. 1013.

            Comments

            Comment on this article