458
views
1
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    2
    shares

      The Journal of Fair Trade is calling for papers to curate a Special Edition on the theme of "Livelihoods, Community Resilience & Evironmental Regeneration: the role of smallholder organisations, coops & Social Enterprise". 

      We're welcoming expressions of interest until 1 July 2024 and article subsmissions by 15th January 2025 Call for Papers Volume 6 Issue 2 deadline.

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The meaning of Fair Trade for wild plants

      Published
      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Where the Fair Trade initiative is applied to wild plants, two contradictory objectives may arise: that of conserving a target plant species (conservation) and that of increasing income from it for collectors (poverty alleviation). As identified through my fieldwork in India, a Fair Trade certification for wild plants has been introduced for different purposes, including (a) to teach the local community the forgotten value of natural resources (conservation), (b) to make current collection practices more sustainable in exchange for better prices (both conservation and poverty alleviation), and (c) to help the most vulnerable collectors with better prices (poverty alleviation). A review of my past study (Makita, 2018) suggests that when there is a single primary objective, such as (a) or (c), certification can more obviously contribute to the achievement of this objective. Given the uniqueness of wild plants as an income source, it is important to clarify which one of the two contradictory objectives will be prioritised, rather than pursuing both.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.2307/j50020019
            jfairtrade
            Journal of Fair Trade
            Pluto Journals
            2513-9525
            2513-9533
            1 June 2021
            : 2
            : 2 ( doiID: 10.13169/jfairtrade.2.issue-2 )
            : 1-4
            Article
            jfairtrade.2.2.0001
            10.13169/jfairtrade.2.2.0001
            7c81aeff-232c-4133-8f7a-cfaed095eafb
            © 2021 Pluto Journals

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Custom metadata
            eng

            Education,Agriculture,Social & Behavioral Sciences,History,Economics
            wild plant collectors,income source,natural resource conservation,certification,non-timber forest products

            References

            1. Fair Trade Advocacy Office (2018). The International Fair Trade Charter. [accessed 20 April 2021] http://291e20_d0760267b 37a41328b80e4df127f85cb.pdf(filesusr.com)THECHARTER|fair-trade.website(fair-trade.website).

            2. FairWild Foundation (2010). FairWild Standard: version 2.0/performance indicators. Weinfelden, Switzerland: FairWild Foundation.

            3. FairWild Foundation (2021) Our story. [accessed 7 February 2021] https://www.fairwild.org/our-story.

            4. Larsen, H.O. & Olsen, C.S. (2007). Unsustainable collection and unfair trade? Uncovering and assessing assumptions regarding Central Himalayan medicinal plant conservation. Biodiversity Conservation, 16(6), 1679–1697.

            5. Makita, R. (2018). Application of Fair Trade certification for wild plants: Lessons from a FairWild project in India. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 25(7), 619–629.

            6. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., Da Fonseca, G.A.B. & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853–858.

            7. Nautiyal, M.C. & Nautiyal B.P. (2004). Collaboration between farmers, research institutions and industry: experiences of Picrorhiza kurrooa cultivation at Gheshe village in Chamoli district, Uttaranchal. In G. Alam & J. Belt (Eds.). Searching synergy: Stakeholder views on developing a sustainable medicinal plant chain in Uttranchal, India (pp. 63–71). Bulletin, 359. Amsterdam: KIT Publishers.

            8. Pauls, T. & Franz, M. (2013). Trading in the dark – the medicinal plants production network in Uttarakhand. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 34(2), 229–243.

            9. Vedeld, P., Angelsen, A., Sjaastad, E. & Berg, G.K. (2004). Counting on the environment: Forest incomes and the rural poor. Environmental Economics Series, 98. Washington, DC: World Bank.

            Comments

            Comment on this article