Book review

Utz, Sonja

doi:10.13169/prometheus.37.1.0097

ScienceOpen: research and publishing network

For Publishers

For Researchers

Blog
About

Search
Advanced search

242

views

recommends

If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journals. Furthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

scite_

Prometheus

Volume 37, Issue 1

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Is Open Access

Book review

Published

book-review

Author(s): Sonja Utz

Publication date (Print): 1 March 2021

Journal: Prometheus

Publisher: Pluto Journals

Bookmark

Content

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (doi): 10.2307/j50022063

Journal ID (jcode): prometheus

Title: Prometheus

Publisher: Pluto Journals

ISSN: 0810-9028

ISSN: 1470-1030

Publication date (Print): 1 March 2021

Volume: 37

Issue: 1 ( doiID: 10.13169/prometheus.37.issue-1 )

Pages: 97-102

Affiliations

Social Media Laboratory, Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien University of Tübingen, Germany, s.utz@ 123456iwm-tuebingen.de

Article

Publisher ID: prometheus.37.1.0097

DOI: 10.13169/prometheus.37.1.0097

SO-VID: 6f69ef09-8bb0-486c-8281-22bb5733cb8d

License:

All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

History

Product

Relating through Technology: Advances in Personal Relationships by Jeffrey A. Hall (2020) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 239pp., £85 (hardback) ISBN 978-1-10848330-8

Custom metadata

lang eng

ScienceOpen disciplines: Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics

References

Baxter, L. and Simon, E. (1993) 'Relationship maintenance strategies and dialectical contradictions in personal relationships', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 2, pp.225–42.
Brewer, M. (1991) 'The social self: on being the same and different at the same time', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 5, pp.475–82.
Carr, C., Wohn, D. and Hayes, R. (2016) 'Like as social support: relational closeness, automaticity, and interpreting social support from paralinguistic digital affordances in social media', Computers in Human Behavior, 62, pp.385–93.
Ellison, N., Triệu, P., Schoenebeck, S., Brewer, R. and Israni, A. (2020) 'Why we don't click: interrogating the relationship between viewing and clicking in social media contexts by exploring the “non-click”', Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25, 6, pp. 402–26.
Hall, J. and Davis, D. (2017) 'Proposing the communicate bond belong theory: evolutionary intersections with episodic interpersonal communication', Communication Theory, 27, 1, pp.21–47.
Hampton, K., Lu, W. and Shin, I. (2016) 'Digital media and stress: the cost of caring 2.0', Information, Communication & Society, 19, 9, pp.1267–86.
Levordashka, A. and Utz, S. (2016) 'Ambient awareness: from random noise to digital closeness in online social networks', Computers in Human Behavior, 60, July, pp.147–54.
Yang, C., Brown, B. and Braun, M. (2014) 'From Facebook to cell calls: layers of electronic intimacy in college students' interpersonal relationships', New Media & Society, 16, 1, pp.5–23.

Comments

Comment on this article

[1] Baxter, L. and Simon, E. (1993) 'Relationship maintenance strategies and dialectical contradictions in personal relationships', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 2, pp.225–42.

[2] Brewer, M. (1991) 'The social self: on being the same and different at the same time', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 5, pp.475–82.

[3] Carr, C., Wohn, D. and Hayes, R. (2016) 'Like as social support: relational closeness, automaticity, and interpreting social support from paralinguistic digital affordances in social media', Computers in Human Behavior, 62, pp.385–93.

[4] Ellison, N., Triệu, P., Schoenebeck, S., Brewer, R. and Israni, A. (2020) 'Why we don't click: interrogating the relationship between viewing and clicking in social media contexts by exploring the “non-click”', Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25, 6, pp. 402–26.

[5] Hall, J. and Davis, D. (2017) 'Proposing the communicate bond belong theory: evolutionary intersections with episodic interpersonal communication', Communication Theory, 27, 1, pp.21–47.

[6] Hampton, K., Lu, W. and Shin, I. (2016) 'Digital media and stress: the cost of caring 2.0', Information, Communication & Society, 19, 9, pp.1267–86.

[7] Levordashka, A. and Utz, S. (2016) 'Ambient awareness: from random noise to digital closeness in online social networks', Computers in Human Behavior, 60, July, pp.147–54.

[8] Yang, C., Brown, B. and Braun, M. (2014) 'From Facebook to cell calls: layers of electronic intimacy in college students' interpersonal relationships', New Media & Society, 16, 1, pp.5–23.