- Record: found
- Abstract: found
- Article: found
Future value change: Identifying realistic possibilities and risks
Abstract
The co-shaping of technology and values is a topic of increasing interest among philosophers of technology. Part of this interest pertains to anticipating future value change, or what Danaher (2021) calls the investigation of ‘axiological futurism’. However, this investigation faces a challenge: ‘axiological possibility space’ is vast, and we currently lack a clear account of how this space should be demarcated. It stands to reason that speculations about how values might change over time should exclude farfetched possibilities and be restricted to possibilities that can be dubbed realistic. But what does this realism criterion entail? This article introduces the notion of ‘realistic possibilities’ as a key conceptual advancement to the study of axiological futurism and offers suggestions as to how realistic possibilities of future value change might be identified. Additionally, two slight modifications to the approach of axiological futurism are proposed. First, axiological futurism can benefit from a more thoroughly historicized understanding of moral change. Secondly, when employed in service of normative aims, the axiological futurist should pay specific attention to identifying realistic possibilities that come with substantial normative risks.
Content
Author and article information
References
E. Anderson (2016) ‘The social epistemology of morality: learning from the forgotten history of the abolition of slavery’ in M. BradyM. Fricker (eds) The Epistemic Life of Groups: Essays in the Epistemology of Collectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp.75–94.
K. Appiah (2010) The Honor Code: How Moral Revolutions Happen, W. W. Norton, New York.
R. Baker (2019) The Structure of Moral Revolution: Studies of Changes in the Morality of Abortion, Death, and the Bioethics Revolution, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
C. BaumbergerR. KnuttiG. Hadorn (2017) ‘Building confidence in climate model projections: an analysis of inferences from fit’, WIREs Climate Change, 8, e454.
G. Betz (2010) ‘What’s the worst case? The methodology of possibilistic prediction’, Analyse & Kritik, 1, pp.87–106.
G. Betz (2016) ‘Accounting for possibilities in decision making’ in S. HanssonG. Hadorn (eds) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis: Reasoning under Uncertainty, Springer, Dordrecht, pp.135–70.
C. Boehm (2012) Moral Origins: The Evolution of Virtue, Altruism, and Shame, Basic Books, New York.
M. BoeninkT. SwierstraD. Sternerding (2010) ‘Anticipating the interaction between technology and morality: a scenario study of experimenting with humans in bionanotechnology’, Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 4, 2, pp.1–38.
P. Brey (2012) ‘Anticipatory ethics for emerging technologies’, Nanoethics 6, 1, pp.1–13.
A. BuchananR. Powell (2017) The Evolution of Moral Progress: A Biocultural Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
A. ChallinorW. AdgerT. BentonD. ConwayM. JoshiD. Frame (2018) ‘Transmission of climate risks across sectors and borders’, Philosophical Transactions Royal Society, A376, pp.1–23.
J. Danaher (2021) ‘Axiological futurism: the systematic study of the future of human values’, Futures, 132, paper 102780.
O. Flanagan (2017) The Geography of Morals: Varieties of Moral Possibility, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
L. FloridiA. Strait (2020) ‘Ethical foresight analysis: what it is and why it is needed?’, Minds & Machines, 30, pp.77–97.
B. FriedmanD. Hendry (2019) Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
S. Gardiner (2011) A Perfect Moral Storm, Oxford University Press, New York.
J. GrahamJ. HaidtS. KolevaM. MotylR. IyerS. Wojcik et al. (2013) ‘Moral foundations theory: the pragmatic validity of moral pluralism’, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, pp.55–130.
S. Hansson (2018) ‘Risk, science and policy: a treacherous triangle’, Ethical Perspectives, 25, 3, pp.391–419.
J. Henrich (2020) The WEIRDest People in the World: How the West became Psychologically Peculiar and Particularly Prosperous, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
J. Holvast (2009) ‘History of privacy’ in V. Matyáš et al. (eds) The Future of Identity. International Federation for Information Processing, Springer, Dordrecht, pp.13–42.
J. Hopster (2017) ‘Two accounts of moral objectivity: from attitude-independence to standpoint invariance’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 20, 4, pp.763–80.
J. Hopster (2018) De Andere Afslag: Hoe had het Leven Anders Kunnen Lopen?, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
J. Hopster (2020a) ‘Shall we adapt? Evolutionary ethics and climate change’ in J. HermannJ. HopsterW. KalfM. Klenk (eds) Philosophy in the Age of Science? Inquiries into Philosophical Progress, Method, and Societal Relevance, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham MD, pp.195–213.
J. Hopster (2020b) ‘Explaining historical moral convergence: the empirical case against realist intuitionism’, Philosophical Studies, 177, pp.1255–73.
J. Hopster (2021a) ‘Climate uncertainty, real possibilities, and the precautionary principle’, Erkenntnis, 00, pp.1–17.
J. Hopster (2021b) ‘What are socially disruptive technologies?’, Technology in Society, 67, paper 101750.
J. Hopster (2022) ‘Climate change, uncertainty and policy’ in G. Di PellegrinoM. Paolo (eds) Handbook of the Philosophy of Climate Change, Springer, Dordrecht.
J. HopsterM. Klenk (2020) ‘Why metaethics needs empirical moral psychology’, Crítica: Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, 52, 155, pp.27–54.
J. HopsterC. AroraC. BlundenC. EriksenL. FrankJ. HermannM. KlenkE. O’NeillS. Steinert (forthcoming) ‘Pistols, pills, pork and ploughs: the structure of technomoral revolutions’.
IPCC (2014) ‘Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change’ in O. Edenhofer et al. (eds) Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
IPCC (2021) ‘Summary for policymakers’ in V. Masson-Delmotte et al. (eds) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
S. Jasanoff (2003) Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science’, Minerva, 41, 3, pp.223–44.
D. KingD. SchragZ. DadiY. QuiA. Ghosh (2015) Climate Change: A Risk Assessment, Centre for Science and Policy, University of Cambridge.
P. Kitcher (2011) The Ethical Project, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
O. Kudina (2019) ‘The technological mediation of morality: value dynamism, and the complex interaction between ethics and technology’, unpublished dissertation, University of Twente.
H. Longino (1990) Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
I. Morris (2015) Foragers, Farmers, and Fossil Fuels: How Human Values Evolve, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
T. MüllerA. RumbergV. Wagner (2018) ‘An introduction to real possibilities, indeterminism, and free ill: three contingencies of the debate’, Synthese 196, 1, pp.1–10.
P. NickelO. KudinaI. van de Poel (2022) ‘Moral uncertainty in technomoral change: bridging the explanatory gap’, Perspectives on Science, available at https://philpapers.org/rec/NICMUI-2 (accessed March 2022).
W. ParkerJ. Risbey (2015) ‘False precision, surprise, and improved uncertainty assessment’, Philosophical Transactions Royal Society A, 373, paper 20140453.
N. Pleasants (2018) ‘The structure of moral revolutions’, Social Theory and Practice 44, 4, pp.567–92.
E. Severini (2016) ‘Evolutionary debunking arguments and the moral niche’, Philosophia, 44, pp.865–75.
T. ShepherdE. BoydR. Calel et al. (2018) ‘Storylines: an alternative approach to representing uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change’, Climatic Change, 151, pp.555–71.
J. SillmannT. ShepherdB. van den HurkW. HazelegerO. MartiusJ. SlingoJ. Zscheischler (2021) ‘Event-based storylines to address climate risk’, Earth’s Future, 9, paper e2020EF001783.
N. Smyth (2021) ‘A genealogy of emancipatory values’, Inquiry, 21 May.
K. Sterelny (2021) The Pleistocene Social Contract: Culture and Cooperation in Human Evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
R. Sutton (2019) ‘Climate science needs to take risk assessment much more seriously’, Bulletin of the American Meterological Society, 100, 9, pp.1637–42.
T. Swierstra (2013) ‘Nanotechnology and technomoral change’, Ethics and Politics, 15, 1, pp.200–19.
M. Tomasello (2016) A Natural History of Human Morality, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
I. van de Poel (2016) ‘An ethical framework for evaluating experimental technology’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 3, pp.667–86.
I. van de Poel (2021) ‘Design for value change’, Ethics and Information Technology, 23, pp.27–31.
E. Winsberg (2018) Philosophy and Climate Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
J. Wright (2021) ‘Morality as a regulator of divergence: protecting against deviance while promoting diversity’, Social Cognition, 39, 1, pp.81–98.
J. ZscheischlerO. MartiusS. Westra et al. (2020) ‘A typology of compound weather and climate events’, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1, pp.333–47.