98
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Studying business & IT? Drive your professional career forwards with BCS books - for a 20% discount click here: shop.bcs.org

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      Accessibility barriers with authentication methods for blind and partially sighted people in the Spanish-speaking world

      Published
      proceedings-article
      , ,
      36th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference (BCS HCI 23)
      The BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference 2023 was co-located with the INTERACT 2023 conference, the theme of which was "Design for Equlity and Justice", as increasingly, computer science as a discipline is becoming concerned about issues of justice and equality – from fake news to rights for robots, from the ethics of driverless vehicles to the gamergate controversy. The BCS HCI Conference welcomed submissions on all aspects of human-computer interaction. Topics included: User Experience, usability testing and interaction design; Education and Health; Smart Energy, Smart Transport and the Internet of Things; Interaction Technologies and Applications.
      28–29 August 2023
      Authentication mechanisms, Passwords, Blind and partially sighted people, Accessibility
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Digital authentication is now an essential part of daily life, allowing users to manage the online security and privacy of their information and digital assets. However, the authentication mechanisms for these processes are not necessarily accessible to blind and partially sighted people, which means that they lose independence or protection. There has been a certain amount of research on the accessibility barriers encountered by blind and partially sighted people in this area, but almost all this research has been done in the English-speaking world. This paper presents an online survey of 34 blind and partially sighted people in Spanish-speaking countries to obtain information on the accessibility barriers they encounter relating to creating, using and changing passwords, using CAPTCHAs, password managers, two-factor authentication, fingerprint and facial recognition, and QR codes. The results indicate numerous severe accessibility barriers which could be avoided by following accessibility standards. It was particularly surprising that even auditory alternatives to CAPTCHAs present accessibility barriers.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Conference
            August 2023
            August 2023
            : 189-198
            Affiliations
            [0001]Computer Science Department

            Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain
            [0002]Computer Science Department

            University of York, York, UK
            [0003]Computer Science Department University of York (UK), St. John's University (NYC)
            Article
            10.14236/ewic/BCSHCI2023.22
            d23f5527-5bfe-4e26-945d-2ae4c98f40db
            © Moreno et al. Published by BCS Learning and Development Ltd. Proceedings of BCS HCI 2023, UK

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            36th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference
            BCS HCI 23
            36
            University of York, UK
            28–29 August 2023
            Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            The BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference 2023 was co-located with the INTERACT 2023 conference, the theme of which was "Design for Equlity and Justice", as increasingly, computer science as a discipline is becoming concerned about issues of justice and equality – from fake news to rights for robots, from the ethics of driverless vehicles to the gamergate controversy. The BCS HCI Conference welcomed submissions on all aspects of human-computer interaction. Topics included: User Experience, usability testing and interaction design; Education and Health; Smart Energy, Smart Transport and the Internet of Things; Interaction Technologies and Applications.
            History
            Product

            1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

            Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/BCSHCI2023.22
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Electronic Workshops in Computing

            Applied computer science,Computer science,Security & Cryptology,Graphics & Multimedia design,General computer science,Human-computer-interaction
            Blind and partially sighted people,Passwords,Accessibility,Authentication mechanisms

            REFERENCES

            1. Ahmed, T., Hoyle, R., Connelly, K., Crandall, D. and Kapadia, A. (2015) ‘Privacy concerns and behaviors of people with visual impairments’, in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Seoul Republic of Korea: ACM, pp. 3523–3532. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702334

            2. Alnfiai, M. (2021) ‘Evaluating the accessibility and usability of a universal CAPTCHA based on gestures for smartphones’, Universal Access in the Information Society, 20(4), pp. 817–831. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00730-x

            3. Andrew, S., Watson, S., Oh, T. and Tigwell, G.W. (2020) ‘A review of literature on accessibility and authentication techniques’, in The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. Virtual Event Greece: ACM, pp. 1–4. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3418005.

            4. Azenkot, S., Rector, K., Ladner, R. and Wobbrock, J. (2012) ‘PassChords: secure multi-touch authentication for blind people’, in Proceedings of the 14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. Boulder Colorado USA: ACM, pp. 159–166. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/2384916.2384945

            5. Blanco-Gonzalo, R., Lunerti, C., Sanchez-Reillo, R., & Guest, R. M. (2018). Biometrics: Accessibility challenge or opportunity? PLOS ONE, 13(3), e0194111. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194111

            6. Bigham, J.P. and Cavender, A.C. (2009) ‘Evaluating existing audio CAPTCHAs and an interface optimized for non-visual use’, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Boston MA USA: ACM, pp. 1829–1838. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518983.

            7. Briotto Faustino, D. and Girouard, A. (2018) ‘Understanding authentication method use on mobile devices by people with vision impairment’, in Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. Galway Ireland: ACM, pp. 217–228. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236342

            8. Dosono, B., Hayes, J., & Wang, Y. (2015)." I'm Stuck!": A Contextual Inquiry of People with Visual Impairments in Authentication. In SOUPS (Vol. 15, pp. 151-168).

            9. Hayes, J., Dosono, B., & Wang, Y. (2017). “They should be convenient and strong”: password perceptions and practices of visually impaired users. In Proceedings of iConference 2017

            10. Holman J., Lazar J., & Feng J. (2008). Investigating the Security-related Challenges of Blind Users on the Web. In P. Langdon, J. Clarkson, & P. Robinson (Eds.), Designing Inclusive Futures. London: Springer.

            11. Holman, J., Lazar, J., Feng, J.H. and D’Arcy, J. (2007) ‘Developing usable CAPTCHAs for blind users’, in Proceedings of the 9th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. Tempe Arizona USA: ACM, pp. 245–246. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/1296843.1296894.

            12. Lazar, J., Feng, J., Brooks, T., Melamed, G., Wentz, B., Holman, J., Olalere, A. and Ekedebe, N. (2012) ‘The SoundsRight CAPTCHA: an improved approach to audio human interaction proofs for blind users’, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Austin Texas USA: ACM, pp. 2267–2276. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208385

            13. Navilens. (2023). https://www.navilens.com/en/

            14. Petrie, H. and Wakefield, M. (2020) ‘Remote moderated and unmoderated evaluation by users with visual disabilities of an online registration and authentication system for health services’, in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion. Online Portugal: ACM, pp. 38–43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3439231.3439248.

            15. Sala, A., Arrue, M., Pérez, J. E., & Valencia, X. (2019). Accessibility-in-use of public e-services: An exploratory study including users with low vision. Proceedings of the XX International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3335595.3335653

            16. Sauer, G., Hochheiser, H., Feng, J., & Lazar, J. (2008). Towards a universally usable CAPTCHA. 4th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS ’08). USENIX.

            17. Sauer, G., Holman, J., Lazar, J., Hochheiser, H. and Feng, J. (2010a) ‘Accessible privacy and security: a universally usable human-interaction proof tool’, Universal Access in the Information Society, 9(3), pp. 239–248. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-009-0171-2

            18. Sauer, G., Lazar, J., Hochheiser, H. and Feng, J. (2010b) ‘Towards a universally usable human interaction proof: evaluation of task completion strategies’, ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 2(4), pp. 1–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/1786774.1786776.

            19. Schmeelk, S. and Petrie, H. (2022) ‘Digital authentication for visually disabled people: initial results of an online survey’, in K. Miesenberger, G. Kouroupetroglou, K. Mavrou, R. Manduchi, M. Covarrubias Rodriguez, and P. Penáz (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 41–50. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08645-8_6

            20. Shirali-Shahreza, S., Penn, G., Balakrishnan, R. and Ganjali, Y. (2013) ‘SeeSay and HearSay CAPTCHA for mobile interaction’, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paris France: ACM, pp. 2147–2156. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481295

            21. Tariq N., & Khan F.A. (2018). Match-the-Sound CAPTCHA. In S. Latifi S. (ed.), In-formation Technology - New Generations. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 558. Cham: Springer.

            22. Vision Australia. QR code advice for people who are blind or have low vision (2021). https://www.visionaustralia.org

            23. VocalEyes. Digital accessibility: QR codes and short number SMS. (2016) https://vocaleyes.co.uk/about/research/digital-accessibility-qr-codes-and-short-number-sms/

            24. von Ahn, L., Blum, M., Hopper, N.J., Langford, J. (2003). CAPTCHA: Using Hard AI Problems for Security. In: Biham, E. (eds) Advances in Cryptology — EUROCRYPT 2003. EUROCRYPT 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2656. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39200-9_18.

            25. Web Accessibility Initiative. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). (2023). https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/

            26. Yamaguchi, M., Nakata, T., Watanabe, H., Okamoto, T. and Kikuchi, H. (2014). ‘Vulnerability of the conventional accessible CAPTCHA used by the White House and an alternative approach for visually impaired people’, in 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). San Diego, CA, USA: IEEE, pp. 3946–3951. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2014.6974548.

            Comments

            Comment on this article