Research Workshop Collected Paper: Explorations in concepts and the visual arts

The EVA London Research Workshop is one of the more unique elements of our Conference that we have been keen to develop over many years. Often Postgraduate Students, at Masters or PhD level, or Unaffiliated Early Career Artists may feel excluded from prestigious conferences until their research is completed and they can submit a full paper proposal. However, over many years, EVA London has recognised the importance of offering an almost unique opportunity to submit projects that can be truly described as ‘Work in Progress’. With an audience of International Academics and acknowledged experts in a field, the Research Workshop presentations have often lead to very positive interest and support, and sometimes to future collaborations. Others return to EVA London a year or two later with a completed piece of Research and a successful Full Conference Proposal. In previous years the presentations have been very popular with all of our delegates and we are delighted to include all of the presentations as part of our mainstream July 2021 Online conference. Although we will once again miss some of the informal networking opportunities, we have, as always, selected an exciting, ground breaking and quite eclectic group of RW delegates. We hope that by publishing their papers here, either grouped together, or individually published, some of you will be keen to contact our RW authors, to discuss and develop their ideas further.

Content

Author and article information

Contributors

Graham Diprose

Frances Liddell

Marco Pini

Sarah Vollmer

Racelar Ho

Conference

Publication date: July 2021

Publication date (Print): July 2021

Pages: 268-274

Affiliations

[0001]Researcher & Author

Co-Chair EVA London

Independent

Redhill, Surrey

[0002]PhD Researcher

Institute for Cultural Practices

University of Manchester

Manchester, UK

[0003]Independent Researcher

ggskips.com

Hackney

London, UK

[0004]PhD Researcher

York University

Toronto, Ontario

Canada

Article

DOI: 10.14236/ewic/EVA2021.46

SO-VID: ebba85bd-6fae-4668-827b-775023915bfe

License:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Conference name: Proceedings of EVA London 2021

Conference acronym: EVA 2021

Conference number:

Conference location: London

Conference date: 5th July – 9th July 2021

Conference sponsor: Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)

Conference theme: AI and the Arts: Artificial Imagination

History

Product

1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/EVA2021.46

Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/

REFERENCES

W. Benjamin, M. Jennings and M. Bullock, n.d. Selected writings.
BBC (2021) ‘NFT blockchain drives surge in digital art auctions’, BBC News. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56252738 (Accessed: 5 March 2021).
M. de Certeau (2011) The Practice of Everyday Life. 3rd ed. University of California Press.
C. Colebrook, 2004. The Sense of Space: On the Specificity of Affect in Deleuze and Guattari. Postmodern Culture, 15(1).
F. Connolly, 2020. A New Happiness? Reading Literature with Deleuze and Guattari in 2020. Butler University.
Crypto-Connections. https://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/collections/cryptoc onnections (accessed 18 March 2021)
P. Davies, 2020. The demon in the machine. [Miejsce nieznane]: Penguin Books.
Q. DuPont (2019) Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains. Cambridge & Malden: Polity Press.
T. Eagleton (1988) The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Poetics Today, 9(2), pp.327-38.
N. Fox, 2002. Refracting ‘Health’: Deleuze, Guattari and Body-Self. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 6(3), pp.347-363.
S. Hazan (2007) ‘A Crisis of Authority’, in Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage. Cambridge, Massachusetts & London: MIT Press, pp.133–148.
E. Holland, 2005. Deleuze and Guattari's Anti-Oedipus. London: Routledge.
J. Horton, 2013. Mental Landscapes: Bazin, Deleuze, and Neorealism (Then and Now). Cinema Journal, 52(2), pp.23-45.
J. Jones (ed) and L Hirsu (ed). (2019) Rhetorical Machines: Writing, Code, and Computational Ethics. Tuscaloosa: University Alabama Press.
B. Luke, A. Shaw and H. Stoilas (2021) ‘WTF are NFTs? Why crypto is dominating the art market’. (The Arts Newspaper). Available at: https://www.theartnewspaper.com/podcast/wtf-nfts (Accessed: 3 April 2021).
B. Noys, 2014. Malign velocities. Winchester, UK: Zero Books.
L. Phillips (2014) ‘The Role of Open Authority in a Collaborative Web’, in M. Ridge (ed.) Crowdsourcinig Our Cultural Heritage. Farnham, Surrey & Burlington, USA: Ashgate, pp. 247–268.
M. Roberts, 2006. Gilles Deleuze: psychiatry, subjectivity, and the passive synthesis of time. Nursing Philosophy, 7(4), pp.191-204.
J. Rohet al. (2020). Hierarchical GPT with Congruent Transformers for Multi-Sentence Language Models. arxiv.org/pdf/2009.08636.pdf (15 March 2021).
S. Sacks et al. (2015) ‘Monegraph and the Status of the Art Object’, Dis. Available at: http://dismagazine.com/discussion/73342/monegraphand-the-status-of-the-art-object/ (Accessed: 12 February 2021).
The Possession Gallery. https://collectibles.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/#/ (Accessed 18 March 2021) N.B a digital wallet is needed to access this space.
V. Tausk, 1992. The influencing machine.
J. Van der Wielen, 2018. Living the intensive order: Common sense and schizophrenia in Deleuze and Guattari. Nursing Philosophy, 19(4), p.e12226.
L. Wintermeyer (2021) ‘Burned Banksy NFT Sets Art And Crypto Worlds Alight’, Forbes. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/lawrencewintermeyer/2021/03/03/burned-banksy-nft-sets-art-and-crypto-worlds-alight/ (Accessed: 5 March 2021).
J. Zdebik, 2014. Deleuze and the diagram. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
S. Zielinski (2006). Deep Time of the Media. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
M. Zeilinger (2018) ‘Digital Art as “Monetised Graphics”: Enforcing Intellectual Property on the Blockchain’, Philosophy & Technology, 31(1), pp. 15–41. [Cross Ref].
S. Zielinski (2019) Variations on Media Thinking. Posthumanities. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

Comments

Comment on this article

[1] W. Benjamin, M. Jennings and M. Bullock, n.d. Selected writings.

[2] BBC (2021) ‘NFT blockchain drives surge in digital art auctions’, BBC News. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56252738 (Accessed: 5 March 2021).

[3] M. de Certeau (2011) The Practice of Everyday Life. 3rd ed. University of California Press.

[4] C. Colebrook, 2004. The Sense of Space: On the Specificity of Affect in Deleuze and Guattari. Postmodern Culture, 15(1).

[5] F. Connolly, 2020. A New Happiness? Reading Literature with Deleuze and Guattari in 2020. Butler University.

[6] Crypto-Connections. https://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/collections/cryptoc onnections (accessed 18 March 2021)

[7] P. Davies, 2020. The demon in the machine. [Miejsce nieznane]: Penguin Books.

[8] Q. DuPont (2019) Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains. Cambridge & Malden: Polity Press.

[9] T. Eagleton (1988) The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Poetics Today, 9(2), pp.327-38.

[10] N. Fox, 2002. Refracting ‘Health’: Deleuze, Guattari and Body-Self. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 6(3), pp.347-363.

[11] S. Hazan (2007) ‘A Crisis of Authority’, in Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage. Cambridge, Massachusetts & London: MIT Press, pp.133–148.

[12] E. Holland, 2005. Deleuze and Guattari's Anti-Oedipus. London: Routledge.

[13] J. Horton, 2013. Mental Landscapes: Bazin, Deleuze, and Neorealism (Then and Now). Cinema Journal, 52(2), pp.23-45.

[14] J. Jones (ed) and L Hirsu (ed). (2019) Rhetorical Machines: Writing, Code, and Computational Ethics. Tuscaloosa: University Alabama Press.

[15] B. Luke, A. Shaw and H. Stoilas (2021) ‘WTF are NFTs? Why crypto is dominating the art market’. (The Arts Newspaper). Available at: https://www.theartnewspaper.com/podcast/wtf-nfts (Accessed: 3 April 2021).

[16] B. Noys, 2014. Malign velocities. Winchester, UK: Zero Books.

[17] L. Phillips (2014) ‘The Role of Open Authority in a Collaborative Web’, in M. Ridge (ed.) Crowdsourcinig Our Cultural Heritage. Farnham, Surrey & Burlington, USA: Ashgate, pp. 247–268.

[18] M. Roberts, 2006. Gilles Deleuze: psychiatry, subjectivity, and the passive synthesis of time. Nursing Philosophy, 7(4), pp.191-204.

[19] J. Rohet al. (2020). Hierarchical GPT with Congruent Transformers for Multi-Sentence Language Models. arxiv.org/pdf/2009.08636.pdf (15 March 2021).

[20] S. Sacks et al. (2015) ‘Monegraph and the Status of the Art Object’, Dis. Available at: http://dismagazine.com/discussion/73342/monegraphand-the-status-of-the-art-object/ (Accessed: 12 February 2021).

[21] The Possession Gallery. https://collectibles.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/#/ (Accessed 18 March 2021) N.B a digital wallet is needed to access this space.

[22] V. Tausk, 1992. The influencing machine.

[23] J. Van der Wielen, 2018. Living the intensive order: Common sense and schizophrenia in Deleuze and Guattari. Nursing Philosophy, 19(4), p.e12226.

[24] L. Wintermeyer (2021) ‘Burned Banksy NFT Sets Art And Crypto Worlds Alight’, Forbes. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/lawrencewintermeyer/2021/03/03/burned-banksy-nft-sets-art-and-crypto-worlds-alight/ (Accessed: 5 March 2021).

[25] J. Zdebik, 2014. Deleuze and the diagram. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

[26] S. Zielinski (2006). Deep Time of the Media. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[27] M. Zeilinger (2018) ‘Digital Art as “Monetised Graphics”: Enforcing Intellectual Property on the Blockchain’, Philosophy & Technology, 31(1), pp. 15–41. [Cross Ref].

[28] S. Zielinski (2019) Variations on Media Thinking. Posthumanities. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

Celebrating 65 years of The Computer Journal - free-to-read perspectives - bcs.org/tcj65