Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: found
Is Open Access

Assessing User Interface Aesthetics based on the Inter-subjectivity of Judgment

,

Proceedings of the 30th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (HCI)

Fusion

11 - 15 July 2016

User interface aesthetics, metric-based evaluation, theory of measurement, visual design, visual principles

Read this article at

Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      "How to assess user interface aesthetics?" remains a question faced by many user interface researchers and designers during the user interface development life cycle since aesthetics positively influence usability, user experience, pleasureability, and trust. Visual techniques borrowed from visual design suggest that the graphical user interface layout could be assessed by aesthetic metrics such as balance, symmetry, proportion, regularity, and simplicity, to name a few. Whereas different formulas exist for computing each aesthetic metric and different interpretations to sum up their results, no consensus exists today on how to consistently evaluate these metrics in a way that is aligned with human judgement, which is intrinsically subjective. In order to address the challenging alignment of human subjectivity with machine objectivity, this paper reports on an experiment comparing the results issued from the inter-subjectivity of judgment of fifteen participants evaluating four main aesthetic metrics on a sample of ten graphical user interfaces and the values of these metrics calculated semi-automatically by a web-based application. The experiment suggests that some metrics, e.g. symmetry, proportion, simplicity, as computed from the formula are actually positively correlated with human judgment, while some other metrics, such as balance, are surprisingly not correlated with the formula computed, thus indicating that another formula or another interpretation should be determined. Therefore, a new formula for computing balance is defined that decomposes balance into horizontal and vertical balances which re-establish a correlation. This paper then provides some new insights on how to rely on these aesthetic metrics and other related metrics, whether they are interpreted manually or computed automatically.

      Related collections

      Most cited references 39

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      What is beautiful is good.

        Bookmark
        • Record: found
        • Abstract: not found
        • Article: not found

        What is beautiful is good.

          Bookmark
          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          What is beautiful is usable

            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Affiliations
            Université catholique de Louvain

            Louvain School of Management, LiLab

            Place des Doyens, 1 - 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
            Contributors
            Conference
            July 2016
            July 2016
            : 1-12
            10.14236/ewic/HCI2016.25
            © Zen et al. Published by BCS Learning and Development Ltd. Proceedings of British HCI 2016 - Fusion, Bournemouth, UK

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            Proceedings of the 30th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference
            HCI
            30
            Bournemouth University, Poole, UK
            11 - 15 July 2016
            Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            Fusion
            Product
            Product Information: 1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Electronic Workshops in Computing

            Comments

            Comment on this article