1,082
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      Celebrating 65 years of The Computer Journal - free-to-read perspectives - bcs.org/tcj65

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      “I would call them, it seems faster”. The state of Telemedicine in Scotland.

      proceedings-article
      ,
      34th British HCI Conference (HCI2021)
      Post-pandemic HCI – Living Digitally
      20th - 21st July 2021
      Telemedicine, Human-Computer Interaction, Covid-19, User Experience
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            The novel Coronavirus pandemic has affected the way people interact with others and services. Online re-mote solutions have been proposed for most interactions including health care. This position paper shows that online health services are under-utilised during Covid-19, and people are often not aware of their ex-istence. Using primary health care (General Practitioners - GPs) and the Near Me and Telecare programs in Scotland as examples, we argue that improving the usability of the GP websites can make Telemedicine more accessible and increase its adoption.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Conference
            July 2021
            July 2021
            : 220-225
            Affiliations
            [0001]School of Computing

            Edinburgh Napier University
            Article
            10.14236/ewic/HCI2021.23
            05fcb4bd-d95c-438c-a609-7c450de2cd7a
            © Sfakakis et al. Published by BCS Learning & Development Ltd. Proceedings of the BCS 34th British HCI Conference 2021, UK

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            34th British HCI Conference
            HCI2021
            34
            London, UK
            20th - 21st July 2021
            Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            Post-pandemic HCI – Living Digitally
            History
            Product

            1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

            Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/HCI2021.23
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Electronic Workshops in Computing

            Applied computer science,Computer science,Security & Cryptology,Graphics & Multimedia design,General computer science,Human-computer-interaction
            Telemedicine,Covid-19,Human-Computer Interaction,User Experience

            References

            1. (2015). Virtual Visits — Confronting the Challenges of Telemedicine. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372(18), 1684-1685.

            2. , , , and . (2012). Telemedicine and telecare for older patients—A systematic review. Maturitas, 73(2), 94-114.

            3. , , , , and (2020). Telemedicine and the COVID-19 Pandemic, Lessons for the Future.

            4. , and (2020). Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for COVID-19. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(18), 1679-1681.

            5. WHO Group Consultation on Health Telematics (1997: Geneva, Switzerland). (1998). A health telematics policy in support of WHO's Health-for-all strategy for global health development: report of the WHO Group Consultation on Health Telematics, 11-16 December, Geneva, 1997. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/63857 (Accessed July, 2020)

            6. , , , , , , and (2020). The role of telehealth in reducing the mental health burden from COVID-19. Telemedicine and e-Health, 26(4), 377-379.

            7. , , , , , , ... and (2019). Benchmarking deployment of eHealth among general practitioners.

            8. , , , and (2018). Trends in telemedicine use in a large commercially insured population, 2005-2017. Jama, 320(20), 2147-2149.

            9. , , , and (2017). Digital natives versus digital immigrants: influence of online health information seeking on the doctor-patient relationship. Health communication, 32(11), 1342-1349.

            10. , , , , , , and (2020). Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 1357633X20916567.

            11. , , and . (2014). Clinician Acceptance is the Key Factor for Sustainable Telehealth Services. Qualitative Health Research, 24(5), 682-694.

            12. , , and (2017)

            13. National Human Genome Research Institute -NIH. (2018). Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008. https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/policy-issues/Genetic-Discrimination#gina (Accessed September, 2020)

            14. Department of Health and Social Care. (2008). Code on genetic testing and insurance. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/c ode-on-genetic-testing-and-insurance (Accessed April, 2021)

            15. , , , , , and (2018). Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 24(1), 4-12.

            16. , , and (2019). The digital divide: examining socio-demographic factors associated with health literacy, access and use of internet to seek health information. Journal of health psychology, 24(12), 1668-1675.

            17. , , , , , and (2019). Digital health: a path to validation. NPJ digital medicine, 2(1), 1-9.

            18. (2015, September). Technology tipping points and societal impact. In World Economic Forum Survey Report, available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GAC15_Technological_Tippin g_Points_report_2015.pdf (Accessed 20.08. 2018).

            19. Digital Office Scotland. (2017). Digital Telecare. https://www.digitaloffice.scot (Accessed May, 2020)

            20. British Telecom. (2018). We are updating our home network.

            21. NHS Near Me. (15, May 2020). Using Near Me - paediatrics. [video] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RxRKGxLDaU (Accessed July, 2020)

            22. , and (2017). Development of the digital health literacy instrument: measuring a broad spectrum of health 1.0 and health 2.0 skills. Journal of medical Internet research, 19(1), e27.

            23. (1996). SUS: a “Quick and dirty usability. Usability evaluation in industry, 189.

            24. (2014). Usability heuristics for user interface design.

            25. W3C. (2008) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211 (Accessed May, 2020)

            26. , and . (2008). Web accessibility design recommendations for people with cognitive disabilities. Technology and Disability, 19(4), 205-212.

            27. , and (2002). Making your website senior friendly. National Institute on Aging and the National Library of Medicine.

            28. , and (2002). Measuring Desirability: New methods for evaluating desirability in a usability lab setting. Proceedings of Usability Professionals Association, 2003(8-12), 57

            29. , , and (2020). Telemedicine in the Era of COVID-19. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 8(5), 1489-1491.

            30. , , and (2020). Global telemedicine implementation and integration within health systems to fight the COVID-19 pandemic: a call to action. JMIR public health and surveillance, 6(2), e18810.

            Comments

            Comment on this article