Assessing Commonality and Differences in Terminology Across Design Disciplines

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Header Abstract Content Author and article information REFERENCES Comments

Record: found
Abstract: found
Conference Proceedings: found

Is Open Access

Assessing Commonality and Differences in Terminology Across Design Disciplines

Published

proceedings-article

Author(s): Kanar Hama Salih , Goksel Misirli , Gordon Rugg

Publication date (Print): July 2022

Conference name: 35th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference (HCI2022)

Conference theme: Towards a Human-Centred Digital Society

Conference date: July 11th to 13th, 2022

Keywords: design terminology, miscommunication, content analysis, safety-critical system

Bookmark

Abstract

Content

Author and article information

Contributors

Kanar Hama Salih

Goksel Misirli

Gordon Rugg

Conference

Publication date: July 2022

Publication date (Print): July 2022

Pages: 1-6

Affiliations

[0001]School of Computing and Mathematics

Keele University, UK

[0002]Hyde & Rugg Associates

30 Queen Street, Market Drayton, UK

Article

DOI: 10.14236/ewic/HCI2022.39

SO-VID: 4120f676-fd7e-46f3-9a86-96bb0d922282

License:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Conference name: 35th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference

Conference acronym: HCI2022

Conference number: 35

Conference location: Keele, Staffordshire

Conference date: July 11th to 13th, 2022

Conference sponsor: Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)

Conference theme: Towards a Human-Centred Digital Society

History

Product

1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/HCI2022.39

Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/

REFERENCES

Arp, R., Smith, B., Spear, A. D. (2015). Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology. The MIT Press, London.
Bjögvinsson, E., Ehn, P. and Hillgren, P.-A. (2012). Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges. Design Issues, 28(3), pp.101–116.
Bos, W. and Tarnai, C. (1999). Content analysis in empirical social research. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(8), 659-671.
Christie, C. (2007). Content Analysis. In R. Baumeister and K. Vohs (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of Social Psychology (p. 176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Canter, D. (1983). The potential of facet theory for applied social psychology. Quality and Quantity, 17(1).
Checkland, P.B. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1981.
Day, R., 2016. Design Error: A Human Factors Approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Drisko, J. and Maschi, T., 2016. Content Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Eckert, Claudia and Maier, Anja and McMahon, Chris. (2005). Communication in Design. Design Process Improvement: A Review of Current Practice. 10.1007/978-1-84628-061-0_10.
Fuchs, C. & Orbrist, M. (2010). HCI and Society: Towards a Typology of Universal Design Principles. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(6) pp 638-656.
Globa, L. et al. (2018) "Ontology for Application Development,” in Ciza Thomas. (ed.) Ontology in Information Science. Rijeka: InTech.
Gruber, T. R. (1995) Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 43, 907−928.
Guttman, L. (1979). New Developments in Integrating Test Design and Analysis, paper presented to the 40th International Conference on Testing Problems, Educational Testing Service New York, October 1979.
Hinkle, D. The change of personal constructs.https://www.pcp-net.org/journal/pctp10/hinkle1965.pdf
Krippendorff, K., 2013. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
Leveson, N. & Turner, C.S. (1993). An Investigation of the Therac-25 Accidents. IEEE Computer, 26(7) pp 18-41.
Maiden, N.A.M. & Rugg, G. (1996). ACRE: a framework for acquisition of requirements. Software Engineering Journal, 11(3) pp. 183-192
Musgrave, D. & Rugg, G. (2012). Visualizing textual structures. ASOR 2012 conference, Chicago
Petre, M. & Rugg, G. (2007). A gentle guide to research methods. Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK.
Rogers, E.M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations (5^th edition). Free Press, New York.
Rosenholtz, R., Twarog, N.R., Schinkel-Bielefeld, N. & Wattenberg, M. (2009). An Intuitive Model of Perceptual Grouping for HCI Design. CHI 2009, Boston.
Rugg, G. & McGeorge, P. (1995). Laddering. Expert Systems, 12(4), pp339-346.
Salustri, Filippo A. and Rogers, Damian (2009). Some Thoughts on Terminology and Discipline in Design. In: Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference2008, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK, 16-19 July 2008.
Shadbolt, N., Berners-Lee, T., and Hall, W. (2006) The Semantic Web Revisited. IEEE Intell. Syst. 21, 96−101.
Shaw, M.L.G. and Gaines, B.R. (1989). Comparing Conceptual Structures: Consensus, Conflict, Correspondence and Contrast. Knowledge Acquisition, 1(4), pp. 341–363.
Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Telerobotics, Automation and Human Supervisory Control. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Tosi, F. (2019). Design for Ergonomics. Cham, Switzerland Springer.

Comments

Comment on this article

[1] Arp, R., Smith, B., Spear, A. D. (2015). Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology. The MIT Press, London.

[2] Bjögvinsson, E., Ehn, P. and Hillgren, P.-A. (2012). Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges. Design Issues, 28(3), pp.101–116.

[3] Bos, W. and Tarnai, C. (1999). Content analysis in empirical social research. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(8), 659-671.

[4] Christie, C. (2007). Content Analysis. In R. Baumeister and K. Vohs (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of Social Psychology (p. 176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

[5] Canter, D. (1983). The potential of facet theory for applied social psychology. Quality and Quantity, 17(1).

[6] Checkland, P.B. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1981.

[7] Day, R., 2016. Design Error: A Human Factors Approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton.

[8] Drisko, J. and Maschi, T., 2016. Content Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

[9] Eckert, Claudia and Maier, Anja and McMahon, Chris. (2005). Communication in Design. Design Process Improvement: A Review of Current Practice. 10.1007/978-1-84628-061-0_10.

[10] Fuchs, C. & Orbrist, M. (2010). HCI and Society: Towards a Typology of Universal Design Principles. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(6) pp 638-656.

[11] Globa, L. et al. (2018) "Ontology for Application Development,” in Ciza Thomas. (ed.) Ontology in Information Science. Rijeka: InTech.

[12] Gruber, T. R. (1995) Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 43, 907−928.

[13] Guttman, L. (1979). New Developments in Integrating Test Design and Analysis, paper presented to the 40th International Conference on Testing Problems, Educational Testing Service New York, October 1979.

[14] Hinkle, D. The change of personal constructs.https://www.pcp-net.org/journal/pctp10/hinkle1965.pdf

[15] Krippendorff, K., 2013. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 3rd ed. London: Sage.

[16] Leveson, N. & Turner, C.S. (1993). An Investigation of the Therac-25 Accidents. IEEE Computer, 26(7) pp 18-41.

[17] Maiden, N.A.M. & Rugg, G. (1996). ACRE: a framework for acquisition of requirements. Software Engineering Journal, 11(3) pp. 183-192

[18] Musgrave, D. & Rugg, G. (2012). Visualizing textual structures. ASOR 2012 conference, Chicago

[19] Petre, M. & Rugg, G. (2007). A gentle guide to research methods. Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK.

[20] Rogers, E.M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations (5^th edition). Free Press, New York.

[21] Rosenholtz, R., Twarog, N.R., Schinkel-Bielefeld, N. & Wattenberg, M. (2009). An Intuitive Model of Perceptual Grouping for HCI Design. CHI 2009, Boston.

[22] Rugg, G. & McGeorge, P. (1995). Laddering. Expert Systems, 12(4), pp339-346.

[23] Salustri, Filippo A. and Rogers, Damian (2009). Some Thoughts on Terminology and Discipline in Design. In: Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference2008, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK, 16-19 July 2008.

[24] Shadbolt, N., Berners-Lee, T., and Hall, W. (2006) The Semantic Web Revisited. IEEE Intell. Syst. 21, 96−101.

[25] Shaw, M.L.G. and Gaines, B.R. (1989). Comparing Conceptual Structures: Consensus, Conflict, Correspondence and Contrast. Knowledge Acquisition, 1(4), pp. 341–363.

[26] Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Telerobotics, Automation and Human Supervisory Control. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[27] Tosi, F. (2019). Design for Ergonomics. Cham, Switzerland Springer.

UK Computing Summit 2025: Navigating change (surviving and beyond) - 29-30 April @ Sheffield Hallam University - Register here.

Assessing Commonality and Differences in Terminology Across Design Disciplines

Contributors

Conference

Affiliations

Article

History

Product

Categories

Comment on this article