559
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Studying business & IT? Drive your professional career forwards with BCS books - for a 20% discount click here: shop.bcs.org

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessing Commonality and Differences in Terminology Across Design Disciplines

      Published
      proceedings-article
      , ,
      35th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference (HCI2022)
      Towards a Human-Centred Digital Society
      July 11th to 13th, 2022
      design terminology, miscommunication, content analysis, safety-critical system
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            A common problem in design is misunderstandings due to the use of different terminology and concepts across different groups involved in the design process. This increases cost and risk in development. We discuss issues involved in trying to create a Unified Design Language that could act as a lingua franca across these groups. We describe a novel way of combining elicitation methods, ontologies, and use of human parallel processing, to improve the process of clarifying terminology used by different groups.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Conference
            July 2022
            July 2022
            : 1-6
            Affiliations
            [0001]School of Computing and Mathematics

            Keele University, UK
            [0002]Hyde & Rugg Associates

            30 Queen Street, Market Drayton, UK
            Article
            10.14236/ewic/HCI2022.39
            4120f676-fd7e-46f3-9a86-96bb0d922282
            © Salih et al. Published by BCS Learning & Development. Proceedings of the 35th British HCI and Doctoral Consortium 2022, UK

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            35th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference
            HCI2022
            35
            Keele, Staffordshire
            July 11th to 13th, 2022
            Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            Towards a Human-Centred Digital Society
            History
            Product

            1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

            Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/HCI2022.39
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Electronic Workshops in Computing

            Applied computer science,Computer science,Security & Cryptology,Graphics & Multimedia design,General computer science,Human-computer-interaction
            safety-critical system,content analysis,miscommunication,design terminology

            REFERENCES

            1. Arp, R., Smith, B., Spear, A. D. (2015). Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology. The MIT Press, London.

            2. Bjögvinsson, E., Ehn, P. and Hillgren, P.-A. (2012). Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges. Design Issues, 28(3), pp.101–116.

            3. Bos, W. and Tarnai, C. (1999). Content analysis in empirical social research. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(8), 659-671.

            4. Christie, C. (2007). Content Analysis. In R. Baumeister and K. Vohs (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of Social Psychology (p. 176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

            5. Canter, D. (1983). The potential of facet theory for applied social psychology. Quality and Quantity, 17(1).

            6. Checkland, P.B. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1981.

            7. Day, R., 2016. Design Error: A Human Factors Approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton.

            8. Drisko, J. and Maschi, T., 2016. Content Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

            9. Eckert, Claudia and Maier, Anja and McMahon, Chris. (2005). Communication in Design. Design Process Improvement: A Review of Current Practice. 10.1007/978-1-84628-061-0_10.

            10. Fuchs, C. & Orbrist, M. (2010). HCI and Society: Towards a Typology of Universal Design Principles. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(6) pp 638-656.

            11. Globa, L. et al. (2018) "Ontology for Application Development,” in Ciza Thomas. (ed.) Ontology in Information Science. Rijeka: InTech.

            12. Gruber, T. R. (1995) Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 43, 907−928.

            13. Guttman, L. (1979). New Developments in Integrating Test Design and Analysis, paper presented to the 40th International Conference on Testing Problems, Educational Testing Service New York, October 1979.

            14. Hinkle, D. The change of personal constructs.https://www.pcp-net.org/journal/pctp10/hinkle1965.pdf

            15. Krippendorff, K., 2013. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 3rd ed. London: Sage.

            16. Leveson, N. & Turner, C.S. (1993). An Investigation of the Therac-25 Accidents. IEEE Computer, 26(7) pp 18-41.

            17. Maiden, N.A.M. & Rugg, G. (1996). ACRE: a framework for acquisition of requirements. Software Engineering Journal, 11(3) pp. 183-192

            18. Musgrave, D. & Rugg, G. (2012). Visualizing textual structures. ASOR 2012 conference, Chicago

            19. Petre, M. & Rugg, G. (2007). A gentle guide to research methods. Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK.

            20. Rogers, E.M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations (5th edition). Free Press, New York.

            21. Rosenholtz, R., Twarog, N.R., Schinkel-Bielefeld, N. & Wattenberg, M. (2009). An Intuitive Model of Perceptual Grouping for HCI Design. CHI 2009, Boston.

            22. Rugg, G. & McGeorge, P. (1995). Laddering. Expert Systems, 12(4), pp339-346.

            23. Salustri, Filippo A. and Rogers, Damian (2009). Some Thoughts on Terminology and Discipline in Design. In: Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference2008, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK, 16-19 July 2008.

            24. Shadbolt, N., Berners-Lee, T., and Hall, W. (2006) The Semantic Web Revisited. IEEE Intell. Syst. 21, 96−101.

            25. Shaw, M.L.G. and Gaines, B.R. (1989). Comparing Conceptual Structures: Consensus, Conflict, Correspondence and Contrast. Knowledge Acquisition, 1(4), pp. 341–363.

            26. Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Telerobotics, Automation and Human Supervisory Control. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

            27. Tosi, F. (2019). Design for Ergonomics. Cham, Switzerland Springer.

            Comments

            Comment on this article