Art-Science Research in Botany: Reinvestigating scientific representations of trees

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Header Abstract Content Author and article information REFERENCES Comments

Record: found
Abstract: found
Conference Proceedings: found

Is Open Access

Art-Science Research in Botany: Reinvestigating scientific representations of trees

Published

proceedings-article

Author(s): Janina Hoth

Publication date (Print): September 2021

Conference name: Proceedings of Politics of the Machines - Rogue Research 2021 (POM 2021)

Conference theme: debate and devise concepts and practices that seek to critically question and unravel novel modes of science

Conference date: September 14-17, 2021

Keywords: Art, science and technology, Scientific constructivism, Art installation, Botany, Art history

Bookmark

Abstract

Content

Author and article information

Contributors

Janina Hoth

Conference

Publication date: September 2021

Publication date (Print): September 2021

Pages: 153-158

Affiliations

[0001]School of Creative Media

City University of Hong Kong

Article

DOI: 10.14236/ewic/POM2021.20

SO-VID: 3e02a415-3d6e-47fc-bc75-6649eae8b97c

License:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Conference name: Proceedings of Politics of the Machines - Rogue Research 2021

Conference acronym: POM 2021

Conference number: 3

Conference location: Berlin, Germany

Conference date: September 14-17, 2021

Conference sponsor: Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)

Conference theme: debate and devise concepts and practices that seek to critically question and unravel novel modes of science

History

Product

1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/POM2021.20

Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/

REFERENCES

B. Albert (2019). Trees. Fondation Cartier pour l’art contemporain.
E. Anderson (2004). Uses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce. Hypatia, 19(1), 1-24. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01266.x
D. Bailer-Jones (2009). Scientific Models in Philosophy of Science. University of Pittsburgh Press.
A. Barry, G. Born, & G. Weszkalnys (2008). Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and society, 37(1), 20-49. http://doi.org/10.1080/03085140701760841
H. Brooks (1965). Scientific Concepts and Cultural Change. Daedalus, 94(1), 66-83. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20026896
E. Coccia (2019). The life of plants: a metaphysics of mixture. Wiley Publishing.
L. Daston (2008). Things that talk: object lessons from art and science (1st paperback ed. ed.). Zone Books, MIT Press.
L. Daston, & E. Lunbeck (2011). Histories of scientific observation. University of Chicago Press.
J. Derrida, C. Porter, & E. P. Morris (1983). The Principle of Reason: The University in the Eyes of Its Pupils. Diacritics, 13(3), 2. http://doi.org/10.2307/464997
M. Di Paola, A. Kallhoff, M. Schörgenhumer, & Francis Taylor. (2018). Plant ethics: : concepts and applications. Routledge, an imprint of Taylor and Francis.
A. S. D. Eller, L. L. Young, A. M. Trowbridge, & R. K. Monson (2016, 2016/02/01). Differential controls by climate and physiology over the emission rates of biogenic volatile organic compounds from mature trees in a semi-arid pine forest. Oecologia, 180(2), 345-358. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3474-4
M. Gagliano, S. Mancuso, & D. Robert (2012). Towards understanding plant bioacoustics. Trends Plant Sci, 17, 325. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.03.002
P. Gibbs (2020). Contemporary Thinking on Transdisciplinary Knowledge: What Those Who Know, Know (1st ed. 2020. ed.). Springer International Publishing: Imprint: Springer.
M. Huber (2014), Bäume wachsen hören. Zentralschweiz am Sonntag, 09.11.2014, 47.
A. Kallhoff (2002). Prinzipien der Pflanzenethik: die Bewertung pflanzlichen Lebens in Biologie und Philosophie. Campus-Verl.
J. Kesselmeier, & M. Staudt (1999, 1999/05/01). Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC): An Overview on Emission, Physiology and Ecology. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 33(1), 23-88. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006127516791
B. Latour (1999). Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, Mass. [u.a.]: Harvard Univ. Press.
B. Latour, & S. Woolgar (2013). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton University Press.
P. K. Machamer, & M. Silberstein (2002). The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of science. Blackwell Publishers.
M. Maeder, & R. Zweifel (2013). Downy Oak: Rendering Ecophysiological Processes In Plants Audible. 10th Sound and Music Computing Conference, Stockholm, Sweden.
S. Mancuso (2015). Brilliant green : the surprising history and science of plant intelligence. Island Press.
M. Marder (2016). Grafts. University of Minnesota Press.
A. Meyer-Brandis, & L. Voropai (2020, 2020/04/02). Exploring the Aesthetic Potential of AMB’s MOC and AAM. Performance Research, 25(3), 74-76. http://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2020.1807761
J. A. Milburn (1966). The Conduction of Sap: I. Water Conduction and Cavitation in water stressed Leaves. Planta, 69(1), 34-42.
J. A. Milburn, & R. P. C. Johnson (1966). The Conduction of Sap: II. Detection of Vibrations produced by sap cavitation in Ricinus xylem. Planta, 69(1), 43-52.
R. C. Mishra, R. Ghosh, & H. Bae (2016). Plant acoustics: in the search of a sound mechanism for sound signaling in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany, 67(15), 4483-4494. http://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw235
H. Nowotny (2001). Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press.
R. J. Petit, & A. Hampe (2006). Some Evolutionary Consequences of Being a Tree. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 37(1), 187-214. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110215
S. Shapin (2008). The scientific life : a moral history of a late modern vocation. University of Chicago Press.
X. Song, X. Lv, D. Yu, & Q. Wu (2018, 2018/01/01/). Spatial-temporal change analysis of plant soundscapes and their design methods. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29, 96-105. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.002
A. L. Tsing (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: on the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press.
G. Vivaldo, E. Masi, C. Taiti, G. Caldarelli, & S. Mancuso (2017). The network of plants volatile organic compounds. Sci Rep, 7, 18. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10975-x
P. Wohlleben (2016). The hidden life of trees : what they feel, how they communicate. discoveries from a secret world. Greystone Books Ltd.
R. Zweifel, & F. Zeugin (2008). Ultrasonic acoustic emissions in drought-stressed trees - more than signals from cavitation. New Phytologist, 179(4), 1070-1079. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02521.x
R. Zweifel; F. Sterck; S. Braun; N. Buchmann; W. Eugster; A. Gessler; HäM. ni; R.L. Peters; L. Walthert; M. Wilhelm; K. Ziemińska; S. Etzold, 2021: Why trees grow at night. New Phytologist, 231, 6: 2174-2185. doi: 10.1111/nph.17552

Comments

Comment on this article

[1] B. Albert (2019). Trees. Fondation Cartier pour l’art contemporain.

[2] E. Anderson (2004). Uses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce. Hypatia, 19(1), 1-24. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01266.x

[3] D. Bailer-Jones (2009). Scientific Models in Philosophy of Science. University of Pittsburgh Press.

[4] A. Barry, G. Born, & G. Weszkalnys (2008). Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and society, 37(1), 20-49. http://doi.org/10.1080/03085140701760841

[5] H. Brooks (1965). Scientific Concepts and Cultural Change. Daedalus, 94(1), 66-83. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20026896

[6] E. Coccia (2019). The life of plants: a metaphysics of mixture. Wiley Publishing.

[7] L. Daston (2008). Things that talk: object lessons from art and science (1st paperback ed. ed.). Zone Books, MIT Press.

[8] L. Daston, & E. Lunbeck (2011). Histories of scientific observation. University of Chicago Press.

[9] J. Derrida, C. Porter, & E. P. Morris (1983). The Principle of Reason: The University in the Eyes of Its Pupils. Diacritics, 13(3), 2. http://doi.org/10.2307/464997

[10] M. Di Paola, A. Kallhoff, M. Schörgenhumer, & Francis Taylor. (2018). Plant ethics: : concepts and applications. Routledge, an imprint of Taylor and Francis.

[11] A. S. D. Eller, L. L. Young, A. M. Trowbridge, & R. K. Monson (2016, 2016/02/01). Differential controls by climate and physiology over the emission rates of biogenic volatile organic compounds from mature trees in a semi-arid pine forest. Oecologia, 180(2), 345-358. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3474-4

[12] M. Gagliano, S. Mancuso, & D. Robert (2012). Towards understanding plant bioacoustics. Trends Plant Sci, 17, 325. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.03.002

[13] P. Gibbs (2020). Contemporary Thinking on Transdisciplinary Knowledge: What Those Who Know, Know (1st ed. 2020. ed.). Springer International Publishing: Imprint: Springer.

[14] M. Huber (2014), Bäume wachsen hören. Zentralschweiz am Sonntag, 09.11.2014, 47.

[15] A. Kallhoff (2002). Prinzipien der Pflanzenethik: die Bewertung pflanzlichen Lebens in Biologie und Philosophie. Campus-Verl.

[16] J. Kesselmeier, & M. Staudt (1999, 1999/05/01). Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC): An Overview on Emission, Physiology and Ecology. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 33(1), 23-88. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006127516791

[17] B. Latour (1999). Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, Mass. [u.a.]: Harvard Univ. Press.

[18] B. Latour, & S. Woolgar (2013). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton University Press.

[19] P. K. Machamer, & M. Silberstein (2002). The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of science. Blackwell Publishers.

[20] M. Maeder, & R. Zweifel (2013). Downy Oak: Rendering Ecophysiological Processes In Plants Audible. 10th Sound and Music Computing Conference, Stockholm, Sweden.

[21] S. Mancuso (2015). Brilliant green : the surprising history and science of plant intelligence. Island Press.

[22] M. Marder (2016). Grafts. University of Minnesota Press.

[23] A. Meyer-Brandis, & L. Voropai (2020, 2020/04/02). Exploring the Aesthetic Potential of AMB’s MOC and AAM. Performance Research, 25(3), 74-76. http://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2020.1807761

[24] J. A. Milburn (1966). The Conduction of Sap: I. Water Conduction and Cavitation in water stressed Leaves. Planta, 69(1), 34-42.

[25] J. A. Milburn, & R. P. C. Johnson (1966). The Conduction of Sap: II. Detection of Vibrations produced by sap cavitation in Ricinus xylem. Planta, 69(1), 43-52.

[26] R. C. Mishra, R. Ghosh, & H. Bae (2016). Plant acoustics: in the search of a sound mechanism for sound signaling in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany, 67(15), 4483-4494. http://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw235

[27] H. Nowotny (2001). Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press.

[28] R. J. Petit, & A. Hampe (2006). Some Evolutionary Consequences of Being a Tree. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 37(1), 187-214. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110215

[29] S. Shapin (2008). The scientific life : a moral history of a late modern vocation. University of Chicago Press.

[30] X. Song, X. Lv, D. Yu, & Q. Wu (2018, 2018/01/01/). Spatial-temporal change analysis of plant soundscapes and their design methods. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29, 96-105. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.002

[31] A. L. Tsing (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: on the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press.

[32] G. Vivaldo, E. Masi, C. Taiti, G. Caldarelli, & S. Mancuso (2017). The network of plants volatile organic compounds. Sci Rep, 7, 18. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10975-x

[33] P. Wohlleben (2016). The hidden life of trees : what they feel, how they communicate. discoveries from a secret world. Greystone Books Ltd.

[34] R. Zweifel, & F. Zeugin (2008). Ultrasonic acoustic emissions in drought-stressed trees - more than signals from cavitation. New Phytologist, 179(4), 1070-1079. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02521.x

[35] R. Zweifel; F. Sterck; S. Braun; N. Buchmann; W. Eugster; A. Gessler; HäM. ni; R.L. Peters; L. Walthert; M. Wilhelm; K. Ziemińska; S. Etzold, 2021: Why trees grow at night. New Phytologist, 231, 6: 2174-2185. doi: 10.1111/nph.17552

UK Computing Summit 2025: Navigating change (surviving and beyond) - 29-30 April @ Sheffield Hallam University - Register here.

Art-Science Research in Botany: Reinvestigating scientific representations of trees

Contributors

Conference

Affiliations

Article

History

Product

Categories

Comment on this article