3,690
views
1
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    54
    shares
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Carotid endarterectomy with local anesthesia and laryngeal mask airway/general anesthesia

      Clinical Case Report
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            There is no clear consensus as to the appropriate anesthetic technique for patients undergoing a carotid endarterectomy. Such patients may have comorbid conditions, such as coronary artery disease, hyperlipidemia, and others. The two main anesthetic approaches are general anesthesia, including an endotracheal tube, with neurological monitoring, and regional anesthesia that allows for an awake patient to be assessed neurologically. The objective of our report was to evaluate a novel anesthetic technique that combined general anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) plus regional anesthesia in the form of bupivacaine injected into the surgical site. Anesthesia was maintained with desflurane 4%, so the patient emerged rapidly for neurological assessment at the conclusion of surgery. We report on a case of a 55-year-old patient who underwent a successful carotid endarterectomy using this hybrid technique of general anesthesia with LMA plus regional anesthesia. This technique was safe and effective, and the patient experienced no complications other than a hematoma on the left neck that was likely the result of long-term use of aspirin and Plavix. While further study is warranted, this hybrid technique of general anesthesia with LMA plus regional anesthesia holds promise for carotid endarterectomy patients.

            Main article text

            INTRODUCTION

            Atherosclerotic buildup in the carotid arteries can be asymptomatic but places patients at elevated risk for cerebral infarction. Occlusions typically occur at the carotid bifurcation and may involve the proximal internal carotid vessel as well. Carotid stenosis typically occurs as part of generalized vascular disease in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and other comorbid conditions.

            Surgical treatment of carotid endarterectomy for carotid stenosis >70% appears to offer advantages over medical therapy [1]. Carotid endarterectomy is associated with a 30-day perioperative risk of stroke or death of 3.3% (95% confidence interval: 1.8–5.9%) for asymptomatic and 6.3% (95% confidence interval: 3.5–11.1%) for symptomatic stenosis [2]. The mean mortality rates have been reported to be about 1% for elective and 3% for emergency carotid endarterectomy [3]. Early stroke may occur in 0.9–7% of carotid endarterectomy patients attributed to embolization [4].

            There is no clear consensus on the most appropriate anesthetic technique for carotid endarterectomy. In a British survey, the majority of surgeons (69%) used general anesthesia, but regional anesthesia, often combining deep and superficial cervical plexus blocks, is increasingly used [5]. The goals of anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy are primarily to prevent the brain and heart from ischemic injury, maintain good hemodynamic stability, and allow for neurological assessment of the patient.

            If general anesthesia is used, care must be taken to maintain adequate cerebral perfusion, and the patient must emerge rapidly and clearly enough to allow for an immediate postoperative neurological evaluation [6]. General anesthesia offers some advantages: the patient can be immobilized, ventilatory control is relatively easy to maintain, and the brain can be protected in the case of ischemic assault. Maintenance anesthesia may use a volatile agent, such as sevoflurane, desflurane, or isoflurane. Ventilation may involve an endotracheal tube (ETT) or a laryngeal mask airway (LMA). Awake neurological evaluation is considered the gold standard, necessitating a smooth, immediate emergence. Monitoring the patient during anesthesia may rely on an electroencephalogram, the somatosensory-evoked potentials, a transcranial Doppler imaging, and an internal carotid artery stump pressure monitor.

            On the other hand, regional anesthesia with deep and superficial cervical plexus blocks and local infiltration of an anesthetic may offer other advantages, including the ability to assess the awake patient perioperatively and equivalent or even superior hemodynamic stability [6]. It has been argued that regional anesthesia holds the potential to shorten hospital stays and may reduce morbidity. However, regional anesthesia limits the use of pharmacological cerebroprotective agents and requires a cooperative patient. Should a transition to general anesthesia from regional anesthesia be required, there is suboptimal access to the patient's airway.

            Hybrid techniques may combine general anesthesia with regional anesthesia to truncate operating times [7]. We report a case of a unique surgical anesthesia technique used to treat a patient with carotid stenosis.

            CASE REPORT

            The patient was a 55-year-old Caucasian male with a history of significant CAD, dyspnea, hyperlipidemia, and carotid stenosis. The patient also had a history of coronary artery bypass graft procedure involving five vessels and about eight months earlier had undergone re-stenting of one vessel using five drug-eluting stents. The patient was taking low-dose aspirin 81 mg, Livalo 2 mg, Nitrostat sublingual 0.4 mg as needed, Plavix 75 mg, Toprol extended release 25 mg, and Tylenol extra strength 500 mg as needed. The patient was allergic to Crestor and has a family history of CAD and type II diabetes.

            A carotid Doppler examination prior to surgery revealed no stenosis on the right carotid artery and 80–99% stenosis on the left. A computer-tomography angiogram showed about 80% stenosis at the origin of the internal carotid artery. The distal vessel diameter was 1 mm vs. 4.5 mm.

            The patient was induced using intravenous (IV) midazolam 2 mg, fentanyl 100 mcg, and propofol 140 mg. Maintenance anesthesia was administered through an LMA with desflurane 4% and fentanyl 150 mcg. Other medications used during the surgery included NTG paste 1″ on chest, IV heparin 5000 units through IV, and IV protamine 50 mg.

            The initial surgical incision was made and 0.25% bupivacaine (total 20 mL) was injected into the surgical site. A cross-clamp was used to place and shortly thereafter to remove a shunt to redirect blood flow during the removal of the atherosclerotic plaque. A drain removed excess fluid. The surgery concluded, the incision sutured closed, and the patient emerged quickly. A neurological assessment with the awake patient could find no neurological deficits.

            The patient recovered quickly and was discharged but returned the second day after surgery when a hematoma on the left side of the neck was observed. The patient remained in the hospital for 24-hour observation, and it was determined that the hematoma was likely the result of long-term use of aspirin and Plavix. No other complications or postsurgical issues were reported.

            DISCUSSION

            General anesthesia requires an ETT with an arterial line and often necessitates neurological monitoring. Local anesthesia allows for neurological assessment of an awake patient, which may or may not require an arterial line, but generally requires a compliant, cooperative patient. Our surgical team developed a unique hybrid procedure that allows for general anesthesia with an LMA (dispensing with the ETT) and desflurane for smooth, rapid emergence supplemented by a local anesthetic at the surgical site. What we have found is that often no or minimal hemodynamic changes occur with LMA due to the light plane of anesthesia required to tolerate it, thus not requiring use of an arterial line. In addition, there is little or no bucking during emergence with LMA anesthesia which, along with rapid emergence, makes this hybrid technique valuable. Overall, this hybrid technique provides the patient minimal anesthesia, does not require an arterial line or a Foley catheter, and promotes hemodynamic stability as well as rapid emergence.

            Our general technique is to use a number 3 or 4 LMA for women and men, respectively, and to allow the patient's spontaneous respiration to continue with assistance from pressure-supported ventilation and 3–4% desflurane. All patients are shunted and patched, and a cross-clamp is applied when the shunt is placed or removed. About 1″ of NTG paste is placed at the onset of the procedure along with 5000 units of IV heparin, which is reversed at the conclusion of the procedure with 50 mg of protamine.

            While this novel technique offers advantages even in a patient with comorbidities and a history of coronary bypass as described in this case, the success of the procedure depends in great measure on the speed at which the surgical team can work and the requisite skill of the surgeon.

            CONCLUSION

            Carotid endarterectomy using general anesthesia with an LMA plus regional anesthesia is feasible in a patient with high-grade carotid occlusion and significant comorbid conditions. This approach avoids deep general anesthesia, eliminates the need for an ETT and arterial line, dispenses with a Foley catheter, promotes good hemodynamic stability, and allows for rapid emergence. Further study of this technique may find that it saves clinical time as well. The main drawback to the procedure is that it requires specific surgical skills and the ability of a surgical team to perform the surgery very quickly. These barriers may be overcome with training.

            References

            1. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet. 1998;351(9113):1379–87. [Cross Ref]

            2. , , , , , , , , , , , . The practice of carotid revascularization in a large metropolitan population. J Stroke Cerebrovascular Dis: Off J Nat Stroke Assoc. 2013;22(2):143–8.

            3. , , , . The relationship between hospital case volume and outcome from carotid endartectomy in England from 2000 to 2005. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;34(6):646–54. [Cross Ref]

            4. , , , , , , . Causes of early post carotid endartectomy stroke in a recent series: the increasing importance of hyperperfusion syndrome. Acta chirurgica Belgica. 2002;102(6):435–8.

            5. , . Carotid endarterectomy: a survey of UK anasthetic practice. Anaesthesia. 2000;55(5):481–485. [Cross Ref]

            6. Gumnit R. Anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. 2010 [cited 8 Aug 2014]. Available from http://www.slideshare.net/cardiacinfo/anesthesia-for-carotid-endarterectomy

            7. , , , . Comparison of regional anesthesia versus combined regional and general anesthesia for elective carotid endarterectomy: a small exploratory study. Reg Anesthesia Pain Med. 2008;33(4):340–5.

            Competing Interests

            The authors declare no competing interests.

            Publishing Notes

            © 2014 Pergolizzi et al. This work has been published open access under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Conditions, terms of use and publishing policy can be found at www.scienceopen.com.

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            (View ORCID Profile)
            Journal
            SOR-MED
            ScienceOpen Research
            ScienceOpen
            2199-1006
            12 December 2014
            : 0 (ID: 27ccddf3-3f6b-42bd-8e29-4b17ba1faaad )
            : 0
            : 1-3
            Affiliations
            [1 ]Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
            [2 ]Department of Pharmacology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
            [3 ]Department of Anesthesiology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
            [4 ]East Brunswick High School, East Brunswick, NJ, USA
            [5 ]Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
            [6 ]NEMA Research Inc., Bonita Springs, FL, USA
            Author notes
            [* ]Corresponding author's e-mail address: robert.taylor.phd@ 123456gmail.com
            Article
            2230:XE
            10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-MED.ATXB4F.v1
            27ccddf3-3f6b-42bd-8e29-4b17ba1faaad
            © 2014 Pergolizzi et al.

            This work has been published open access under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0 , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Conditions, terms of use and publishing policy can be found at www.scienceopen.com .

            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 7, Pages: 3
            Product
            Categories
            Clinical Case Report

            Cardiovascular Medicine
            carotid endarterectomy,local anesthesia,laryngeal mask airway,general anesthesia,coronary artery disease

            Comments

            The paper describes an interesting case report concerning the evaluation of a new anesthetic technique (a combined general anesthesia (desfluorane 4%) with a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) plus regional anesthesia (bupivacaine injected into the surgical site) for carotid endarterectomy. The Authors report on a case of 1 patient (a 55 year old male with an important history of comorbidities).

            The study is of great clinical relevance in this kind of surgical treatment.

            The paper is well-written, well organized, sufficiently updated, and comprehensible.

            In the paper, the Authors underline that only one patient was considered in order to study the hybrid technique proposed, suppose to be safer and less invasive. Obviously, additional cases would be necessary to confirm their observations and results, and to draw precise conclusions.

            I think that to support better the Authors description (i.e.: “no or minimal hemodynamic changes”, or “hemodymamic stability”, or “the patient recovered quickly”) sentences should be supported by data (hemodynamic parameters, ventilation, blood pressure, the awakening time after anesthesia [the body weight?]).

            Concerning the local anesthesia, the Authors have to detail better the procedure (infiltration?).

            Hematoma: on what basis the Authors can exclude complications due to carotid surgery?

            In the middle of the case report, please, pay attention to “…. Other medications used during the surgery included NTG phase 1” on chest, IV heparin 5000 units through IV,……”: see the words in bold, may be, it is a repetition.

            2015-05-04 08:55 UTC
            +1
            I appreciate the authors for writing this interesting case report describing a novel technique - Use of general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway plus local anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. Carotid endarterectomy(CEA) is commonly performed either under regional anesthesia (superficial and deep cervical plexus block) or general anesthesia or a combination of both. No particular technique has proven to be superior to the other. I agree with the authors that patients for CEA present with significant co morbidities. They have described a simple and safe anesthetic technique that may enhance patient recovery after surgery. I appreciate the authors for sharing their experience and describing this novel technique. I wish the authors would have described little more in detail the intra operative ventilator settings and subsequent respiratory and hemodynamic parameters during the procedure. My suggestion to the authors is that patients for CEA have significant comorbidities and invasive blood pressure monitoring for early intervention is advisable. Overall a nice case report for the readers to appreciate. The authors gave new insights to the readers describing a novel less invasive anesthetic technique for CEA surgery.
            2015-04-21 21:57 UTC
            +1

            Comment on this article