21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Antibiotic therapy with metronidazole reduces endometriosis disease progression in mice: a potential role for gut microbiota

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          STUDY QUESTION

          Does altering gut microbiota with antibiotic treatment have any impact on endometriosis progression?

          SUMMARY ANSWER

          Antibiotic therapy reduces endometriosis progression in mice, possibly by reducing specific gut bacteria.

          WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

          Endometriosis, a chronic condition causing abdominal pain and infertility, afflicts up to 10% of women between the ages of 25 and 40, ~5 million women in the USA. Current treatment strategies, including hormone therapy and surgery, have significant side effects and do not prevent recurrences. We have little understanding of why some women develop endometriosis and others do not.

          STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

          Mice were treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics or metronidazole, subjected to surgically-induced endometriosis and assayed after 21 days.

          PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

          The volumes and weights of endometriotic lesions and histological signatures were analysed. Proliferation and inflammation in lesions were assessed by counting cells that were positive for the proliferation marker Ki-67 and the macrophage marker Iba1, respectively. Differences in faecal bacterial composition were assessed in mice with and without endometriosis, and faecal microbiota transfer studies were performed.

          MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

          In mice treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics (vancomycin, neomycin, metronidazole and ampicillin), endometriotic lesions were significantly smaller (~ 5-fold; P < 0.01) with fewer proliferating cells ( P < 0.001) than those in mice treated with vehicle. Additionally, inflammatory responses, as measured by the macrophage marker Iba1 in lesions and IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6 and TGF-β1 in peritoneal fluid, were significantly reduced in mice treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics ( P < 0.05). In mice treated with metronidazole only, but not in those treated with neomycin, ectopic lesions were significantly ( P < 0.001) smaller in volume than those from vehicle-treated mice. Finally, oral gavage of faeces from mice with endometriosis restored the endometriotic lesion growth and inflammation ( P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively) in metronidazole-treated mice.

          LARGE-SCALE DATA

          N/A.

          LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

          These findings are from a mouse model of surgically-induced endometriosis. Further studies are needed to determine the mechanism by which gut bacteria promote inflammation, identify bacterial genera or species that promote disease progression and assess the translatability of these findings to humans.

          WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

          Our findings suggest that gut bacteria promote endometriosis progression in mice. This finding if translated to humans, could aid in the development of improved diagnostic tools and personalised treatment strategies.

          STUDY FUNDING AND COMPETING INTEREST(S)

          This work was funded, in part, by: a National Institutes of Health (NIH)/ National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) grant (R00HD080742) to RK; Washington University School of Medicine start-up funds to RK; an Endometriosis Foundation of America Research Award to R.K.; and an NIH/NICHD grant (R01HD091218) to IUM. The authors report no conflict of interest.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Recognition of commensal microflora by toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis.

          Toll-like receptors (TLRs) play a crucial role in host defense against microbial infection. The microbial ligands recognized by TLRs are not unique to pathogens, however, and are produced by both pathogenic and commensal microorganisms. It is thought that an inflammatory response to commensal bacteria is avoided due to sequestration of microflora by surface epithelia. Here, we show that commensal bacteria are recognized by TLRs under normal steady-state conditions, and this interaction plays a crucial role in the maintenance of intestinal epithelial homeostasis. Furthermore, we find that activation of TLRs by commensal microflora is critical for the protection against gut injury and associated mortality. These findings reveal a novel function of TLRs-control of intestinal epithelial homeostasis and protection from injury-and provide a new perspective on the evolution of host-microbial interactions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis.

            Originally described over three hundred years ago, endometriosis is classically defined by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma in extrauterine locations. Endometriosis is an inflammatory, estrogen-dependent condition associated with pelvic pain and infertility. This work reviews the disease process from theories regarding origin to the molecular basis for disease sequelae. A thorough understanding of the histopathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis is essential to the development of novel diagnostic and treatment approaches for this debilitating condition. Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The Characterization of Feces and Urine: A Review of the Literature to Inform Advanced Treatment Technology

              The safe disposal of human excreta is of paramount importance for the health and welfare of populations living in low income countries as well as the prevention of pollution to the surrounding environment. On-site sanitation (OSS) systems are the most numerous means of treating excreta in low income countries, these facilities aim at treating human waste at source and can provide a hygienic and affordable method of waste disposal. However, current OSS systems need improvement and require further research and development. Development of OSS facilities that treat excreta at, or close to, its source require knowledge of the waste stream entering the system. Data regarding the generation rate and the chemical and physical composition of fresh feces and urine was collected from the medical literature as well as the treatability sector. The data were summarized and statistical analysis was used to quantify the major factors that were a significant cause of variability. The impact of this data on biological processes, thermal processes, physical separators, and chemical processes was then assessed. Results showed that the median fecal wet mass production was 128 g/cap/day, with a median dry mass of 29 g/cap/day. Fecal output in healthy individuals was 1.20 defecations per 24 hr period and the main factor affecting fecal mass was the fiber intake of the population. Fecal wet mass values were increased by a factor of 2 in low income countries (high fiber intakes) in comparison to values found in high income countries (low fiber intakes). Feces had a median pH of 6.64 and were composed of 74.6% water. Bacterial biomass is the major component (25–54% of dry solids) of the organic fraction of the feces. Undigested carbohydrate, fiber, protein, and fat comprise the remainder and the amounts depend on diet and diarrhea prevalence in the population. The inorganic component of the feces is primarily undigested dietary elements that also depend on dietary supply. Median urine generation rates were 1.42 L/cap/day with a dry solids content of 59 g/cap/day. Variation in the volume and composition of urine is caused by differences in physical exertion, environmental conditions, as well as water, salt, and high protein intakes. Urine has a pH 6.2 and contains the largest fractions of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium released from the body. The urinary excretion of nitrogen was significant (10.98 g/cap/day) with urea the most predominant constituent making up over 50% of total organic solids. The dietary intake of food and fluid is the major cause of variation in both the fecal and urine composition and these variables should always be considered if the generation rate, physical, and chemical composition of feces and urine is to be accurately predicted.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Hum Reprod
                Hum. Reprod
                humrep
                Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
                Oxford University Press
                0268-1161
                1460-2350
                June 2019
                30 April 2019
                04 June 2020
                : 34
                : 6
                : 1106-1116
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis MO 63110, USA
                [2 ]Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis MO 63110, USA
                [4 ]Genome Technology Access Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis MO 63110, USA
                [3 ]Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis MO 63110, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence address. Ramakrishna Kommagani, PhD. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, BJC Institute of Health - 10th Floor, RM 10606, 425 S. Euclid Avenue Campus Box 8064, St. Louis MO 63110, USA. Tel: +(314) 273-1638; Fax: +(314) 747-0264; Email: kommagani@ 123456wustl.edu
                Article
                PMC6554192 PMC6554192 6554192 dez041
                10.1093/humrep/dez041
                6554192
                31037294
                615d1c60-2412-4aa2-8c69-d32755674516
                © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

                This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

                History
                : 12 October 2018
                : 19 February 2019
                : 04 March 2019
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
                Funded by: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 10.13039/100000071
                Award ID: R00HD080742
                Funded by: Washington University School of Medicine
                Funded by: Endometriosis Foundation of America Research Award
                Funded by: NIH/NICHD
                Award ID: R01HD091218
                Funded by: Genome Technology Access Center
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute Grant
                Award ID: P30 CA91842
                Funded by: Siteman Cancer Center
                Funded by: Clinical and Translational Sciences
                Award ID: UL1TR002345
                Funded by: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences 10.13039/100006108
                Categories
                Original Article
                Reproductive Biology

                endometriosis,microbiome,metronidazole,gut bacteria,inflammation

                Comments

                Comment on this article