5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Increasing generations in captivity is associated with increased vulnerability of Tasmanian devils to vehicle strike following release to the wild.

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Captive breeding of threatened species, for release to the wild, is critical for conservation. This strategy, however, risks producing captive-raised animals with traits poorly suited to the wild. We describe the first study to characterise accumulated consequences of long-term captive breeding on behaviour, by following the release of Tasmanian devils to the wild. We test the impact of prolonged captive breeding on the probability that captive-raised animals are fatally struck by vehicles. Multiple generations of captive breeding increased the probability that individuals were fatally struck, a pattern that could not be explained by other confounding factors (e.g. age or release site). Our results imply that long-term captive breeding programs may produce animals that are naïve to the risks of the post-release environment. Our analyses have already induced changes in management policy of this endangered species, and serve as model of productive synergy between ecological monitoring and conservation strategy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Introduction to Conservation Genetics

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs.

            As wild environments are often inhospitable, many species have to be captive-bred to save them from extinction. In captivity, species adapt genetically to the captive environment and these genetic adaptations are overwhelmingly deleterious when populations are returned to wild environments. I review empirical evidence on (i) the genetic basis of adaptive changes in captivity, (ii) factors affecting the extent of genetic adaptation to captivity, and (iii) means for minimizing its deleterious impacts. Genetic adaptation to captivity is primarily due to rare alleles that in the wild were deleterious and partially recessive. The extent of adaptation to captivity depends upon selection intensity, genetic diversity, effective population size and number of generation in captivity, as predicted by quantitative genetic theory. Minimizing generations in captivity provides a highly effective means for minimizing genetic adaptation to captivity, but is not a practical option for most animal species. Population fragmentation and crossing replicate captive populations provide practical means for minimizing the deleterious effects of genetic adaptation to captivity upon populations reintroduced into the wild. Surprisingly, equalization of family sizes reduces the rate of genetic adaptation, but not the deleterious impacts upon reintroduced populations. Genetic adaptation to captivity is expected to have major effects on reintroduction success for species that have spent many generations in captivity. This issue deserves a much higher priority than it is currently receiving.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The effects of captive experience on reintroduction survival in carnivores: A review and analysis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Scientific reports
                Springer Nature
                2045-2322
                2045-2322
                May 19 2017
                : 7
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ] School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. catherine.grueber@sydney.edu.au.
                [2 ] Division of Applied Animal Ecology, San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego, CA, USA. catherine.grueber@sydney.edu.au.
                [3 ] Division of Applied Animal Ecology, San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego, CA, USA.
                [4 ] Save the Tasmanian Devil Program, DPIPWE, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
                [5 ] School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
                [6 ] Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
                [7 ] Zoo and Aquarium Association Australasia, Mosman, Australia.
                Article
                10.1038/s41598-017-02273-3
                10.1038/s41598-017-02273-3
                5438407
                28526824
                ae99f488-565f-4f9e-8583-9a615e79ac19
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article