Chitosan nanoparticles as delivery systems for doxorubicin

The fluorescence characteristics of daunomycin (DNM), doxorubicin (DXR), and other anthracycline drugs are often used to monitor localization of the drug within lipid bilayers and liposomal delivery systems and to assess interaction of the drug with DNA and other macromolecules. However, the binding of DNM and DXR to proteins and membrane systems has been observed to exhibit variable effects on the anthracycline's fluorescence. We have delineated the spectroscopic response of DXR and DNM to their surroundings in several systems, including solvents of differing dielectric constant, aqueous solutions of varying pH or fluorophore concentration, and the reverse micellar system of AOT/heptane/water with a range of doxorubicin concentrations. We have observed that the ratio of fluorescence intestinal at the two principal lambda max values shows a parabolic dependence on solvent dielectric constant, i.e. inverted solvatochromism. This behavior has been overlooked by previous investigators and, together with the appearance of a long-wavelength band near 630 nm in solvents of low dielectric strength (also previously not reported), is key to understanding the partitioning of anthracyclines in membrane systems as well as resolving the conflicting interpretation of data in the literature.

We have demonstrated that in vitro resistance of tumor cells to doxorubicin (Dox) can be fully circumvented by using doxorubicin-loaded nanospheres (Dox-NS), consisting of biodegradable polyisohexylcyanoacrylate polymers of 300 nm diameter and containing 2.83 mg of Dox per 31.5 mg of polymer. Five different multidrug-resistant cell lines, characterized by mdr1 amplification, were used in this study: Dox-R-MCF7, a human breast adenocarcinoma; SKVBL1, a human ovarian adenocarcinoma; K562-R, a human erythroleukemia; and two murine lines: P388-Adr-R, a monocytic leukemia of DBA2 mouse, and LR73MDR, a Chinese hamster ovarian cell line. These lines were 38.7, 210, 232, 143 and 20 times more resistant than their corresponding sensitive counterparts, respectively. Using Dox-NS, we obtained complete reversion of drug resistance in vitro, i.e. cell growth inhibition comparable with that obtained with sensitive cells exposed to free Dox. In vivo, we significantly prolonged the survival of DBA2 mice which had previously received P388-Adr-R cells by i.p. injections of Dox-NS, while free Dox injection was ineffective toward this rapidly growing tumor. (Prolongation of survival time: 115% vs 167% after Dox vs Dox-NS treatment, respectively.) Using the MCF7 cell line and its resistant variant, we studied the intracellular concentration and the cytoplasmic and nuclear distribution of Dox by laser microspectrofluorometry (LMSF). In sensitive cells, we observed a similar accumulation and distribution of Dox whatever the form of Dox delivery, i.e. whether free or carried by nanospheres. Analysis by LMSF showed that 99% of intranuclear Dox was bound to DNA after treatment with both forms of Dox. Of Dox, 81 and 83% were found in the intranuclear compartment of sensitive cells incubated with free Dox and Dox-NS, respectively. Resistant cells incubated with Dox-NS accumulated the same amount of Dox as sensitive cells incubated with free Dox or with Dox-NS. Dox, when loaded in nanospheres, bypasses the efflux mechanism responsible for multidrug resistance. LMSF analysis showed that Dox, transported and released by nanospheres, interacts with DNA identically in sensitive and resistant cells.