11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Tail regeneration after autotomy revives survival: a case from a long-term monitored lizard population under avian predation

      , , , ,
      Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
      The Royal Society

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d745824e205">Caudal autotomy in lizards has intrigued scientists for more than 100 years. Because of the relative lack of literature under natural conditions, the complicated association among field autotomy rate, real predation pressure, the long-term cost of tail loss, and the benefit of regeneration remains equivocal. In this study, we conducted a 7-year capture–mark–recapture (CMR) programme with a wild population of a sexually dichromatic lizard, <i>Takydromus viridipunctatus</i>. We used autotomy indexes and a contemporary bird census mega-dataset of four predatory birds as predictors to examine the association between tail loss and predation pressure. We further estimated the survival cost of tail loss and alleviation by regeneration under natural conditions through CMR modelling. We found that large and small avian predators affect lizard survival through the following two routes: the larger-sized cattle egret causes direct mortality while the smaller shrikes and kestrels are the major causes of autotomy. Following autotomy, the survival rate of tailless individuals over the next month was significantly lower than that of tailed individuals, especially males during the breeding season, which showed a decline of greater than 30%. This sex-related difference further demonstrated the importance of reproductive costs for males in this sexually dichromatic species. However, the risk of mortality returned to baseline after the tails were fully grown. This study indicates the benefit of tail regeneration under natural conditions, which increases our understanding of the cost–benefit dynamics of caudal autotomy and further explains the maintenance of this trait as an evolutionarily beneficial adaption to long-term predator–prey interactions. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evolution of animal regeneration: re-emergence of a field.

          Regeneration, the replacement of lost body parts, is widespread yet highly variable among animals. Explaining this variation remains a major challenge in biology. Great strides have been made in understanding the phylogenetic distribution, ecological context and developmental basis of regeneration, and these new data are yielding novel insights into why and how regeneration evolves. Here, we review the phylogenetic distribution of regeneration and discuss how the origin, maintenance and loss of regeneration can each be driven by distinct factors. As the complexity of factors affecting regeneration evolution is increasingly appreciated, and as explicitly evolutionary studies of regeneration become more common, the coming years promise exciting progress in revealing the underlying mechanisms that have shaped animal regeneration.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Costs of Sexual Selection in Natural Populations of Mammals

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              To cut a long tail short: a review of lizard caudal autotomy studies carried out over the last 20 years

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                Proc. R. Soc. B
                The Royal Society
                0962-8452
                1471-2954
                January 18 2017
                January 25 2017
                January 18 2017
                January 25 2017
                : 284
                : 1847
                : 20162538
                Article
                10.1098/rspb.2016.2538
                5310044
                28100821
                004bd5a2-745c-4c9e-a366-2765052a42bc
                © 2017

                http://royalsocietypublishing.org/licence

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article