37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Validation of the 10-item Chinese perceived stress scale in elderly service workers: one-factor versus two-factor structure

      research-article
      BMC psychology
      BioMed Central
      Stress, Measure, Scale validation, Psychometrics

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Despite its popularity, the psychometric properties of the 10-item Chinese Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS-10) in working adults are yet to be evaluated.

          Methods

          This study examined CPSS-10 in elderly service workers through a questionnaire survey. The sample was randomly split into two for exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

          Results

          A high response rate (93%) was achieved, resulting in 992 completed questionnaires. EFA with the first split sample favored a two-factor over a one-factor solution. The second factor had eigenvalue 2.00 and provided 19.95% explained variance. In CFA with the second split sample, the two-factor structure showed satisfactory goodness-of-fit (CFI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.06) while the one-factor structure showed poor data fit (CFI = 0.62, RMSEA = 0.14). Further analyses on the two-factor structure revealed that the whole scale and two subscales had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s alphas = 0.67 to 0.78). The total score was positively associated with perceived workload and burnout ( r = 0.17 to 0.48), but negatively with work engagement ( r = −0.13 to −0.30). In contrary to previous studies, a low inter-factor correlation ( r = −0.08) was revealed.

          Conclusions

          CPSS-10 showed a stable two-factor structure with satisfactory internal consistency and construct validity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Book: not found

          Stress, Appraisal, and Coping

          <p><b>The reissue of a classic work, now with a foreword by Daniel Goleman!</b><p>Here is a monumental work that continues in the tradition pioneered by co-author Richard Lazarus in his classic book <i>Psychological Stress and the Coping Process</i>. Dr. Lazarus and his collaborator, Dr. Susan Folkman, present here a detailed theory of psychological stress, building on the concepts of cognitive appraisal and coping which have become major themes of theory and investigation.</p> <p>As an integrative theoretical analysis, this volume pulls together two decades of research and thought on issues in behavioral medicine, emotion, stress management, treatment, and life span development. A selective review of the most pertinent literature is included in each chapter. The total reference listing for the book extends to 60 pages.</p> <p>This work is necessarily multidisciplinary, reflecting the many dimensions of stress-related problems and their situation within a complex social context. While the emphasis is on psychological aspects of stress, the book is oriented towards professionals in various disciplines, as well as advanced students and educated laypersons. The intended audience ranges from psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, nurses, and social workers to sociologists, anthropologists, medical researchers, and physiologists.</p>
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            :{unav)

            Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Further Psychometric Support for the 10-Item Version of the Perceived Stress Scale

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ngsiuman@hku.hk
                Journal
                BMC Psychol
                BMC Psychol
                BMC psychology
                BioMed Central (London )
                2050-7283
                19 June 2013
                19 June 2013
                2013
                : 1
                : 1
                : 9
                Affiliations
                Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
                Article
                8
                10.1186/2050-7283-1-9
                4269992
                25566361
                01d3db57-6c3d-4bf9-9e4b-69c4f1c8ae96
                © Ng; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

                This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 4 September 2012
                : 29 May 2013
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd 2013

                stress,measure,scale validation,psychometrics
                stress, measure, scale validation, psychometrics

                Comments

                Comment on this article