There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Tibial component loosening and lack of bone ingrowth remain serious problems in uncemented
knee arthroplasty. Initial implant stability is the most important factor in achieving
bone ingrowth. Eccentric axial loading causing liftoff has been identified as a potential
problem, but the role of torsion and shear stability is unclear. This study assesses
the micromotion in two uncemented components subjected to eccentric axial (lateral,
medial, posterior, anterior), shear, and torsional loads. Four configurations were
tested: Tricon M (pegs) (Smith and Nephew Richards, Memphis, TN), Genesis (stem only)
(Smith and Nephew Richards), Genesis with screws, and Genesis with pegs. Nine pairs
of cadaver tibias were implanted, and cyclic loads were applied. Micromotion was measured
with two linear variable differential transformers. Micromotion values for each mode
of loading were compared using a one-way analysis of variance. Genesis with screws
had the least micromotion for all applied loads (14-33 micrometers), whereas Genesis
with stem only has the maximum value of micromotion (27-212 micrometers). Genesis
wit and Tricon had intermediate ranges of micromotion (32-121 and 107-140 micrometers,
respectively). It is concluded that peg fixation and stem fixation are inadequate
and result in significant micromotion. Stem plus screws provides the most stable fixation
and may be compatible with bone ingrowth.