<i>In Vitro</i> Evaluation of Aerosol Delivery by Hand-Held Mesh Nebulizers in an Adult Spontaneous Breathing Lung Model

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

<p class="first" id="d964289e105">Background: Drug inhalation is common mode of treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of aerosol devices in a simulated COPD adult lung model using five commercially available hand-held mesh nebulizers. Materials and Methods: Five nebulizers (PARI VELOX®, Omron NE-U22, Aeroneb® Go, APEX PY001, and Pocket Air®) were tested with a unit dose of 5.0 mg/2.5 mL salbutamol. An in vitro lung model (compliance: 0.06 L/cm H2O, resistance: 20 cm H2O/L/sec) was constructed to simulate parameters (tidal volume of 500 mL, respiratory rate of 15 breaths/min, inspiratory time of 1 second) of an adult patient with COPD. A bacterial filter was attached at the bronchi level for drug collection, referring as inhaled mass. After nebulization, the inhaled mass (%), dose remaining on each component (%), particle size characteristics, and nebulizer performances were analyzed. Particle size characteristics were analyzed using an 8-stage Anderson Cascade Impactor. The salbutamol particles deposited were eluted and analyzed using a spectrophotometer at 276 nm. The inhaled mass (%), dose remaining on each component (%), particle size distribution, and nebulizer performance were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Sheffee post hoc tests. Results: Pocket Air and APEX PY001 showed the greatest inhaled mass and the lowest dose in the mouthpiece connection. The largest and smallest mass median aerodynamic diameters were found with Omron NE-U22 and PARI VELOX, respectively. In addition, the output rate and inhaled aerosol rate (IAR) of PARI VELOX were higher than those of other nebulizers. Conclusions: This study showed that the performance of commercially available mesh nebulizers varied. Aerosol particles deposited on different auxiliary equipment directly influenced the output rate and IAR of the mesh nebulizer. Clinical validation of the drug IAR is necessary to avoid overdose and reduce drug wastage. </p>

Related collections

Most cited references 34

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Aerosol drug delivery: developments in device design and clinical use.

M Dolovich, R Dhand (2011)

Aerosolised drugs are prescribed for use in a range of inhaler devices and systems. Delivering drugs by inhalation requires a formulation that can be successfully aerosolised and a delivery system that produces a useful aerosol of the drug; the particles or droplets need to be of sufficient size and mass to be carried to the distal lung or deposited on proximal airways to give rise to a therapeutic effect. Patients and caregivers must use and maintain these aerosol drug delivery devices correctly. In recent years, several technical innovations have led to aerosol drug delivery devices with efficient drug delivery and with novel features that take into account factors such as dose tracking, portability, materials of manufacture, breath actuation, the interface with the patient, combination therapies, and systemic delivery. These changes have improved performance in all four categories of devices: metered dose inhalers, spacers and holding chambers, dry powder inhalers, and nebulisers. Additionally, several therapies usually given by injection are now prescribed as aerosols for use in a range of drug delivery devices. In this Review, we discuss recent developments in the design and clinical use of aerosol devices over the past 10-15 years with an emphasis on the treatment of respiratory disorders. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

0 comments Cited 106 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Is Open Access

Fundamentals of aerosol therapy in critical care

Jayesh Dhanani, John Fraser, Hak-Kim Chan … (2016)

Drug dosing in critically ill patients is challenging due to the altered drug pharmacokinetics–pharmacodynamics associated with systemic therapies. For many drug therapies, there is potential to use the respiratory system as an alternative route for drug delivery. Aerosol drug delivery can provide many advantages over conventional therapy. Given that respiratory diseases are the commonest causes of critical illness, use of aerosol therapy to provide high local drug concentrations with minimal systemic side effects makes this route an attractive option. To date, limited evidence has restricted its wider application. The efficacy of aerosol drug therapy depends on drug-related factors (particle size, molecular weight), device factors, patient-related factors (airway anatomy, inhalation patterns) and mechanical ventilation-related factors (humidification, airway). This review identifies the relevant factors which require attention for optimization of aerosol drug delivery that can achieve better drug concentrations at the target sites and potentially improve clinical outcomes.

0 comments Cited 38 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

The influence of fluid physicochemical properties on vibrating-mesh nebulization.

Thu Ghazanfari, Abdelbary M. A. Elhissi, Zhiyi Ding … (2007)

In this study, the effect of fluid physicochemical properties and the vibrating-mesh mechanism on the aerosols generated from vibrating-mesh nebulizers have been evaluated using fluids having a range of viscosity, surface tension and ion concentration. Two nebulizers were investigated: the Omron MicroAir NE-U22 (passively vibrating) and the Aeroneb Pro (actively vibrating) mesh nebulizers. For both devices, the total aerosol output was generally unaffected by fluid properties. Increased viscosity or ion concentration resulted in a decrease in droplet volume median diameter (VMD) and an increase in fine particle fraction (FPF). Moreover, increased viscosity resulted in prolonged nebulization and reduced output rate, particularly for the Omron nebulizer. Both nebulizers were unsuitable for delivery of viscous fluids since nebulization was intermittent or completely ceased at >1.92cP. The presence of ions reduced variability particularly for the Aeroneb Pro nebulizer. No clear effect of surface tension was observed on the performance of nebulizers employing a vibrating-mesh technology. However, when viscosity was low, reduced surface tension seemed advantageous in shortening the nebulization time and increasing the output rate, but for the Omron nebulizer this also increased the droplet VMD and decreased the FPF. This study has shown that vibrating-mesh nebulization was highly dependent on fluid characteristics and nebulizer mechanism of operation.