2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of Cryopreservation on Cell Metabolic Activity and Function of Biofabricated Structures Laden with Osteoblasts

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Biofabrication and maturation of bone constructs is a long-term task that requires a high degree of specialization. This specialization falls onto the hierarchy complexity of the bone tissue that limits the transfer of this technology to the clinic. This work studied the effects of the short-term cryopreservation on biofabricated osteoblast-containing structures, with the final aim to make them steadily available in biobanks. The biological responses studied include the osteoblast post-thawing metabolic activity and the recovery of the osteoblastic function of 3D-bioprinted osteoblastic structures and beta tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) scaffolds infiltrated with osteoblasts encapsulated in a hydrogel. The obtained structures were cryopreserved at −80 °C for 7 days using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as cryoprotectant additive. After thawing the structures were cultured up to 14 days. The results revealed fundamental biological aspects for the successful cryopreservation of osteoblast constructs. In summary, immature osteoblasts take longer to recover than mature osteoblasts. The pre-cryopreservation culture period had an important effect on the metabolic activity and function maintain, faster recovering normal values when cryopreserved after longer-term culture (7 days). The use of β-TCP scaffolds further improved the osteoblast survival after cryopreservation, resulting in similar levels of alkaline phosphatase activity in comparison with the non-preserved structures. These results contribute to the understanding of the biology of cryopreserved osteoblast constructs, approaching biofabrication to the clinical practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Bone substitutes: an update.

          Autograft is considered ideal for grafting procedures, providing osteoinductive growth factors, osteogenic cells, and an osteoconductive scaffold. Limitations, however, exist regarding donor site morbidity and graft availability. Allograft on the other hand, posses the risk of disease transmission. Synthetic graft substitutes lack osteoinductive or osteogenic properties. Composite grafts combine scaffolding properties with biological elements to stimulate cell proliferation and differentiation and eventually osteogenesis. We present here an overview of bone grafts and graft substitutes available for clinical applications.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field.

            Biofabrication is an evolving research field that has recently received significant attention. In particular, the adoption of Biofabrication concepts within the field of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine has grown tremendously, and has been accompanied by a growing inconsistency in terminology. This article aims at clarifying the position of Biofabrication as a research field with a special focus on its relation to and application for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Within this context, we propose a refined working definition of Biofabrication, including Bioprinting and Bioassembly as complementary strategies within Biofabrication.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Functional 3D Neural Mini-Tissues from Printed Gel-Based Bioink and Human Neural Stem Cells

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Materials (Basel)
                Materials (Basel)
                materials
                Materials
                MDPI
                1996-1944
                22 April 2020
                April 2020
                : 13
                : 8
                : 1966
                Affiliations
                [1 ]CEITEC—Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Purkynova 123, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic
                [2 ]Tissue Bioengineering Laboratory, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacan, Mexico City 04510, Mexico
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: eb.montufar@ 123456ceitec.vutbr.cz ; Tel.: +420-54114-9201
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9788-1403
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8122-4000
                Article
                materials-13-01966
                10.3390/ma13081966
                7215951
                32331435
                0b90ce5e-4a15-442a-a80f-eac8e8dcfe46
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 24 March 2020
                : 20 April 2020
                Categories
                Article

                biofabrication,bioprinting,cryopreservation,bone construct,osteoblast,metabolic activity,alp activity

                Comments

                Comment on this article