21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Durvalumab plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

          First-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that lacks targetable mutations is platinum-based chemotherapy. Among patients with a tumor proportion score for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) of 50% or greater, pembrolizumab has replaced cytotoxic chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of choice. The addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy resulted in significantly higher rates of response and longer progression-free survival than chemotherapy alone in a phase 2 trial.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer.

            There is no established standard chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. We initially conducted a randomized, phase 2 study involving 86 patients to compare cisplatin plus gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone. After we found an improvement in progression-free survival, the trial was extended to the phase 3 trial reported here. We randomly assigned 410 patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer to receive either cisplatin (25 mg per square meter of body-surface area) followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for eight cycles) or gemcitabine alone (1000 mg per square meter on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks for six cycles) for up to 24 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. After a median follow-up of 8.2 months and 327 deaths, the median overall survival was 11.7 months among the 204 patients in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 8.1 months among the 206 patients in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.80; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 8.0 months in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 5.0 months in the gemcitabine-only group (P<0.001). In addition, the rate of tumor control among patients in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group was significantly increased (81.4% vs. 71.8%, P=0.049). Adverse events were similar in the two groups, with the exception of more neutropenia in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group; the number of neutropenia-associated infections was similar in the two groups. As compared with gemcitabine alone, cisplatin plus gemcitabine was associated with a significant survival advantage without the addition of substantial toxicity. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is an appropriate option for the treatment of patients with advanced biliary cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00262769.) 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Durvalumab plus platinum–etoposide versus platinum–etoposide in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial

              Most patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have extensive-stage disease at presentation, and prognosis remains poor. Recently, immunotherapy has demonstrated clinical activity in extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). The CASPIAN trial assessed durvalumab, with or without tremelimumab, in combination with etoposide plus either cisplatin or carboplatin (platinum-etoposide) in treatment-naive patients with ES-SCLC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                NEJM Evidence
                NEJM Evidence
                Massachusetts Medical Society
                2766-5526
                June 2022
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
                [2 ]Division of Hematology and Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
                [3 ]Cancer Center of Nanjing, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China
                [4 ]Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
                [5 ]National Institute of Cancer Research, Tainan, Taiwan
                [6 ]National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
                [7 ]Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
                [8 ]Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
                [9 ]Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea
                [10 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
                [11 ]Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University, Seoul, South Korea
                [12 ]Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
                [13 ]Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN
                [14 ]Department of Liver Cancer Unit, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris Hôpital Beaujon, Paris, France
                [15 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
                [16 ]Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester/The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
                [17 ]Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
                [18 ]Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
                [19 ]Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
                [20 ]Instituto de Investigaciones Metabólicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [21 ]Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
                [22 ]Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
                [23 ]Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
                [24 ]Department of Hematology-Oncology, Linkou Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang-Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
                [25 ]AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD
                Article
                10.1056/EVIDoa2200015
                35278356
                0be15dac-bc8d-4a9d-8384-9cafa22487c5
                © 2022
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article