20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      A Comparison of Sennosides-Based Bowel Protocols with and without Docusate in Hospitalized Patients with Cancer

      ,
      Journal of Palliative Medicine
      Mary Ann Liebert Inc

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Constipation is a common and distressing condition in patients with cancer, especially those taking opioid analgesics. Many institutions prevent and treat constipation with titrated laxatives, which is known as a bowel protocol. An effective and well-tolerated bowel protocol is a very important component of cancer care, and there is little evidence on which to base selection of the most appropriate agents. This study compares a protocol of the stimulant laxative sennosides alone with a protocol of sennosides plus the stool softener docusate, in hospitalized patients at an oncology center. The docusate-containing protocol had an initial docusate-only step for patients not taking opioids, and four to six 100-mg capsules of docusate sodium in addition to the sennosides for the rest of the protocol.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Systematic review on the management of chronic constipation in North America.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Constipation in advanced cancer patients.

            Constipation is a frequent, distressing, and underestimated complication in patients with advanced cancer. It may develop from general disturbances that may or may not be cancer related, but the use of opioids is one of the main causes in this population. Opioids affect the intestine by reducing motility and secretions and by increasing fluid absorption and blood flow. Untreated constipation may lead to several complications. Effective management of constipation starts with a careful assessment of the patient, including the history of the frequency and difficulty of defaecation, symptoms caused by constipation, and physical and rectal examinations. When the diagnosis of constipation is unclear, an abdominal X-ray may be required. The treatment of constipation includes general interventions, such as the availability of comfort and privacy or the elimination of medical factors that may contribute to constipation, and therapeutic interventions including oral or rectal laxatives and the use of prokinetic drugs and naloxone. The purpose of this paper is to review the pathophysiology and causes of constipation and the effects of opioids on the gastrointestinal tract, and to propose an approach for its assessment and management. Randomized clinical trials between different laxatives and/or prokinetic agents in cancer patients are needed, and future studies should focus on the validation of different clinical assessment tools for constipation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adverse effects of drugs used in the management of constipation and diarrhoea.

              Most laxatives, if used intermittently in the absence of contraindications, are relatively safe. Bulking agents may diminish absorption of some minerals and drugs, but this is not usually clinically significant. Ispaghula can cause serious allergic reactions. The chronic ingestion of stimulant laxatives has been blamed for the development of the 'cathartic colon', but there are no definitive studies which have demonstrated this. Dantron (danthron) preparations should only be used in older patients and the terminally ill because of the risk of hepatotoxicity with this drug. Oral oxyphenisatine should no longer be used. Senna would appear to be the stimulant laxative of choice during pregnancy and lactation. Bisacodyl is the polyphenolic derivative of choice. Lactulose, sorbitol and lactilol rarely cause significant adverse effects. Magnesium salt laxatives and phosphate enemas can cause serious metabolic disturbances in babies and young children. Liquid paraffin is contraindicated if there is any risk of aspiration. Interference with the absorption of fat soluble vitamins would not appear to be clinically significant. Docusate sodium may potentiate the hepatotoxicity of other drugs, but reports of this are rare. The role of cisapride in constipation has not been established. Antidiarrhoeal drugs are second line drugs whose use is aimed at minimising inconvenience and discomfort. No antidiarrhoeals can be recommended for children under 4 years of age. Loperamide is the drug of choice in older children and adults. The atropine component of diphenoxylate/atropine combinations can cause significant adverse effects. Bismuth salicylate is an inconvenient treatment for travellers' diarrhoea as large frequent doses of the liquid formulation are needed. Some bismuth can be absorbed and there is the potential to cause encephalopathy. Octreotide, methysergide and cholestyramine have a role for specific causes of diarrhoea only. Octreotide is effective in high output states from the small or large bowel, with few adverse effects. Clonidine and lidamidine may have a role in the treatment of chronic diabetic diarrhoea. The role of lidamidine in nondiabetic chronic diarrhoea has not been established.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Palliative Medicine
                Journal of Palliative Medicine
                Mary Ann Liebert Inc
                1096-6218
                1557-7740
                May 2008
                May 2008
                : 11
                : 4
                : 575-581
                Article
                10.1089/jpm.2007.0178
                18454610
                0f90c8ae-4763-4a0a-9ebd-39a4c4f97646
                © 2008
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article