22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Meta-analysis of Genome Wide Association Studies Identifies Genetic Markers of Late Toxicity Following Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

      research-article
      a , b , 1 , c , 1 , d , e , 1 , f , g , c , c , h , h , i , h , i , j , c , e , k , l , b , b , m , c , d , n , 2 , o , p , 2 , b , q , r , 2 , e , l , 2 , s , 2 , d , 2 , d , t , 2 , u , * , 2 , Radiogenomics Consortium
      EBioMedicine
      Elsevier
      SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism, GWAS, genome-wide association study, EBRT, external bean radiotherapy, BED, biologic effective dose, MAF, minor allele frequency, STAT, standardized total average toxicity, PCA, principle components analysis, TURP, transurethral resection of the prostate, LD, linkage disequilibrium, ENCODE, encyclopedia of DNA elements, eQTL, expression quantitative trait locus, GTEx, Genotype-Tissue Expression project, Radiogenomics, Genome-wide association study, Prostate cancer, Radiation toxicity, Cancer survivorship, Quality of life

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Nearly 50% of cancer patients undergo radiotherapy. Late radiotherapy toxicity affects quality-of-life in long-term cancer survivors and risk of side-effects in a minority limits doses prescribed to the majority of patients. Development of a test predicting risk of toxicity could benefit many cancer patients. We aimed to meta-analyze individual level data from four genome-wide association studies from prostate cancer radiotherapy cohorts including 1564 men to identify genetic markers of toxicity. Prospectively assessed two-year toxicity endpoints (urinary frequency, decreased urine stream, rectal bleeding, overall toxicity) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associations were tested using multivariable regression, adjusting for clinical and patient-related risk factors. A fixed-effects meta-analysis identified two SNPs: rs17599026 on 5q31.2 with urinary frequency (odds ratio [OR] 3.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.08–4.69, p-value 4.16 × 10 − 8) and rs7720298 on 5p15.2 with decreased urine stream (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.90–3.86, p-value = 3.21 × 10 − 8). These SNPs lie within genes that are expressed in tissues adversely affected by pelvic radiotherapy including bladder, kidney, rectum and small intestine. The results show that heterogeneous radiotherapy cohorts can be combined to identify new moderate-penetrance genetic variants associated with radiotherapy toxicity. The work provides a basis for larger collaborative efforts to identify enough variants for a future test involving polygenic risk profiling.

          Highlights

          • SNPs rs17599026 and rs7720298 increase risk of urinary toxicity following radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients.

          • Data from heterogeneous radiotherapy cohorts can be meta-analyzed to identify genetic variants associated with toxicity.

          • A SNP-based predictive assay could improve the therapeutic index of radiotherapy and aid in individualization of cancer treatment.

          Risk of radiotherapy side-effects in a minority limits doses given to the majority. A test is needed to predict risks so treatments are personalized. Recent whole-genome studies in a few hundred patients found none or one genetic variant increasing side-effect risk. Larger studies are needed, but difficult because treatments differ between centers. Our study of > 1500 prostate cancer patients from four centers found two variants. The research shows combining heterogeneous radiotherapy datasets works and larger collaborative efforts identifying enough variants for a future test are worthwhile. As nearly 50% of cancer patients have radiotherapy, our work could benefit many people.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges.

          The past year has witnessed substantial advances in understanding the genetic basis of many common phenotypes of biomedical importance. These advances have been the result of systematic, well-powered, genome-wide surveys exploring the relationships between common sequence variation and disease predisposition. This approach has revealed over 50 disease-susceptibility loci and has provided insights into the allelic architecture of multifactorial traits. At the same time, much has been learned about the successful prosecution of association studies on such a scale. This Review highlights the knowledge gained, defines areas of emerging consensus, and describes the challenges that remain as researchers seek to obtain more complete descriptions of the susceptibility architecture of biomedical traits of interest and to translate the information gathered into improvements in clinical management.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction to the scientific issues.

            Advances in dose-volume/outcome (or normal tissue complication probability, NTCP) modeling since the seminal Emami paper from 1991 are reviewed. There has been some progress with an increasing number of studies on large patient samples with three-dimensional dosimetry. Nevertheless, NTCP models are not ideal. Issues related to the grading of side effects, selection of appropriate statistical methods, testing of internal and external model validity, and quantification of predictive power and statistical uncertainty, all limit the usefulness of much of the published literature. Synthesis (meta-analysis) of data from multiple studies is often impossible because of suboptimal primary analysis, insufficient reporting and variations in the models and predictors analyzed. Clinical limitations to the current knowledge base include the need for more data on the effect of patient-related cofactors, interactions between dose distribution and cytotoxic or molecular targeted agents, and the effect of dose fractions and overall treatment time in relation to nonuniform dose distributions. Research priorities for the next 5-10 years are proposed. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Meta-analysis methods for genome-wide association studies and beyond.

              Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) has become a popular method for discovering genetic risk variants. Here, we overview both widely applied and newer statistical methods for GWAS meta-analysis, including issues of interpretation and assessment of sources of heterogeneity. We also discuss extensions of these meta-analysis methods to complex data. Where possible, we provide guidelines for researchers who are planning to use these methods. Furthermore, we address special issues that may arise for meta-analysis of sequencing data and rare variants. Finally, we discuss challenges and solutions surrounding the goals of making meta-analysis data publicly available and building powerful consortia.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                EBioMedicine
                EBioMedicine
                EBioMedicine
                Elsevier
                2352-3964
                20 July 2016
                August 2016
                20 July 2016
                : 10
                : 150-163
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
                [b ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
                [c ]Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
                [d ]Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
                [e ]Grupo de Medicina Xenómica, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (USC), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
                [f ]Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
                [g ]Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
                [h ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Servizo Galego de Saúde (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
                [i ]Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
                [j ]Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
                [k ]Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Servizo Galego de Saúde (SERGAS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
                [l ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
                [m ]Cancer and Other Non-Infectious Diseases, MRC Clinical Trials Unit, London WC2B 6NH, UK
                [n ]Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
                [o ]Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
                [p ]Department of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
                [q ]Department of Genetics and Genomics Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
                [r ]Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
                [s ]University of Cambridge, Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
                [t ]Department of Oncology, Box 193, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB0 0QQ, UK
                [u ]Institute of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Christie Hospital, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Catharine.West@ 123456manchester.ac.uk
                [1]

                Joint first authors.

                [2]

                Joint last authors.

                Article
                S2352-3964(16)30327-9
                10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.07.022
                5036513
                27515689
                10653df9-f835-492c-b2f3-51cfd70c2361
                © 2016 The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 24 May 2016
                : 8 July 2016
                : 18 July 2016
                Categories
                Research Paper

                snp, single nucleotide polymorphism,gwas, genome-wide association study,ebrt, external bean radiotherapy,bed, biologic effective dose,maf, minor allele frequency,stat, standardized total average toxicity,pca, principle components analysis,turp, transurethral resection of the prostate,ld, linkage disequilibrium,encode, encyclopedia of dna elements,eqtl, expression quantitative trait locus,gtex, genotype-tissue expression project,radiogenomics,genome-wide association study,prostate cancer,radiation toxicity,cancer survivorship,quality of life

                Comments

                Comment on this article