32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Translational control of nicotine-evoked synaptic potentiation in mice and neuronal responses in human smokers by eIF2α

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Adolescents are particularly vulnerable to nicotine, the principal addictive component driving tobacco smoking. In a companion study, we found that reduced activity of the translation initiation factor eIF2α underlies the hypersensitivity of adolescent mice to the effects of cocaine. Here we report that nicotine potentiates excitatory synaptic transmission in ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neurons more readily in adolescent mice compared to adults. Adult mice with genetic or pharmacological reduction in p-eIF2α-mediated translation are more susceptible to nicotine’s synaptic effects, like adolescents. When we investigated the influence of allelic variability of the Eif2s1 gene (encoding eIF2α) on reward-related neuronal responses in human smokers, we found that a single nucleotide polymorphism in the Eif2s1 gene modulates mesolimbic neuronal reward responses in human smokers. These findings suggest that p-eIF2α regulates synaptic actions of nicotine in both mice and humans, and that reduced p-eIF2α may enhance susceptibility to nicotine (and other drugs of abuse) during adolescence.

          DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12056.001

          eLife digest

          Nicotine addiction is a serious public health problem. People who start using nicotine during adolescence are more likely to become addicted to it during adulthood, but the reasons for this are not well understood. Nicotine causes long-lasting changes in the brain that are responsible for the feelings of pleasure and reward. In particular, nicotine strengthens the connections between neurons at structures called synapses and increases communication between reward-related neurons in key reward areas of the brain. This hijacking of the natural reward system requires new proteins to be made. However, the relationship between protein synthesis and adolescents being particularly vulnerable to nicotine addiction was not known.

          In a related study, Huang et al. found that the reduced activity of a protein called eIF2α, which controls the production of new proteins, accounts for why adolescents are more likely to become addicted to cocaine than adults. Thus, Placzek et al. wanted to know whether the same was true for nicotine and whether the proteins controlled by eIF2α are involved in the way human nicotine addicts experience reward.

          Placzek et al. found that adolescent mice are more susceptible than adult mice to the changes in synaptic strength that are caused by nicotine. This increased susceptibility results from reduced activity levels of the protein eIF2α. Reducing the activity of eIF2α in adult mice made their synapses as likely to change strength in response to nicotine as the synapses of adolescent mice.

          Placzek et al. also used a technique called functional magnetic resonance imaging and found that compared to non-smokers, the brain activity of human smokers was significantly reduced when given a natural reward. Further studies revealed a variation in the gene encoding the eIF2α protein that affects how smokers respond to a reward, suggesting that this variant is linked to the likelihood that a person will be addicted to nicotine.

          This work raises several important questions. In addition to regulating the initial adaptive changes induced in the brain by nicotine, does eIF2α activity affect compulsive nicotine use? If so, could targeting parts of the eIF2α pathway help treat nicotine addiction? Finally, further studies could explore whether the gene variant identified by Placzek et al. affects how users of other drugs (such as cocaine or alcohol) respond to natural rewards.

          DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12056.002

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms of addiction.

          Investigations of long-term changes in brain structure and function that accompany chronic exposure to drugs of abuse suggest that alterations in gene regulation contribute substantially to the addictive phenotype. Here, we review multiple mechanisms by which drugs alter the transcriptional potential of genes. These mechanisms range from the mobilization or repression of the transcriptional machinery - including the transcription factors ΔFOSB, cyclic AMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB) and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) - to epigenetics - including alterations in the accessibility of genes within their native chromatin structure induced by histone tail modifications and DNA methylation, and the regulation of gene expression by non-coding RNAs. Increasing evidence implicates these various mechanisms of gene regulation in the lasting changes that drugs of abuse induce in the brain, and offers novel inroads for addiction therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Single cocaine exposure in vivo induces long-term potentiation in dopamine neurons.

            How do drugs of abuse modify neural circuitry and thereby lead to addictive behaviour? As for many forms of experience-dependent plasticity, modifications in glutamatergic synaptic transmission have been suggested to be particularly important. Evidence of such changes in response to in vivo administration of drugs of abuse is lacking, however. Here we show that a single in vivo exposure to cocaine induces long-term potentiation of AMPA (alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-isoxazole propionic acid)-receptor-mediated currents at excitatory synapses onto dopamine cells in the ventral tegmental area. Potentiation is still observed 5 but not 10 days after cocaine exposure and is blocked when an NMDA (N-methyl-d-aspartate) receptor antagonist is administered with cocaine. Furthermore, long-term potentiation at these synapses is occluded and long-term depression is enhanced by in vivo cocaine exposure. These results show that a prominent form of synaptic plasticity can be elicited by a single in vivo exposure to cocaine and therefore may be involved in the early stages of the development of drug addiction.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Drugs of abuse and stress trigger a common synaptic adaptation in dopamine neurons.

              Drug seeking and drug self-administration in both animals and humans can be triggered by drugs of abuse themselves or by stressful events. Here, we demonstrate that in vivo administration of drugs of abuse with different molecular mechanisms of action as well as acute stress both increase strength at excitatory synapses on midbrain dopamine neurons. Psychoactive drugs with minimal abuse potential do not cause this change. The synaptic effects of stress, but not of cocaine, are blocked by the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist RU486. These results suggest that plasticity at excitatory synapses on dopamine neurons may be a key neural adaptation contributing to addiction and its interactions with stress and thus may be an attractive therapeutic target for reducing the risk of addiction.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Reviewing editor
                Journal
                eLife
                Elife
                eLife
                eLife
                eLife
                eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
                2050-084X
                01 March 2016
                2016
                : 5
                : e12056
                Affiliations
                [1 ]deptDepartment of Neuroscience , Baylor College of Medicine , Houston, United States
                [2 ]deptMemory and Brain Research Center , Baylor College of Medicine , Houston, United States
                [3 ]deptMenninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences , Baylor College of Medicine , Houston, United States
                [4 ]Michael E. DeBakey Veteran Administration Medical Center , Houston, United States
                [5 ]deptVerna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology , Baylor College of Medicine , Houston, United States
                [6 ]deptDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics , Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco, United States
                [7 ]deptDepartment of Physiology , McGill University , Montreal, Canada
                [8 ]deptCenter for Genomic Medicine, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine , Dartmouth College , Lebanon, United States
                [9 ]deptDepartment of Neuroscience, Mahoney Institute for Neurosciences , Perelman School of Medicine , Philadelphia, United States
                [10]Fundação Champalimaud , Portugal
                [11]Fundação Champalimaud , Portugal
                Author notes
                [* ]For correspondence: costamat@ 123456bcm.edu
                [‡]

                Division of Basic Medical Sciences, Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, United States.

                [§]

                Calico LLC, South San Francisco, United States.

                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9809-4732
                Article
                12056
                10.7554/eLife.12056
                4786418
                26928076
                106affe8-1bc0-4ce5-8741-f75f5ee5f318
                © 2016, Placzek et al

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 03 October 2015
                : 13 January 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000025, National Institute of Mental Health;
                Award ID: MH096816
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000065, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke;
                Award ID: NS076708, NS21229
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000026, National Institute on Drug Abuse;
                Award ID: DA09411, DA026539, DA09167
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000011, Howard Hughes Medical Institute;
                Award ID: PW
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000738, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs;
                Award ID: VHA5I01CX000994
                Award Recipient :
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
                Categories
                Short Report
                Neuroscience
                Custom metadata
                2.5
                An evolutionarily conserved mechanism involving translational control by p-eIF2α underlies vulnerability to nicotine addiction.

                Life sciences
                nicotine-induced plasticity,protein synthesis,ventral tegmental area,human fmri,adolescents,human,mouse

                Comments

                Comment on this article