7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Opt-out rates and reasons for non-participation in a single-arm feasibility trial (ENGAGE) of a guided internet-administered CBT-based intervention for parents of children treated for cancer: a nested cross-sectional survey

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Difficulties with recruitment into clinical trials are common. An opt-out recruitment strategy, whereby potential participants can decline further contact about a study (opt-out), and non-responders are contacted, may facilitate participation. Primary objectives examined opt-out and consent rates, mode and time point of opt-out, and sociodemographic characteristics of those who opted out versus those who chose to participate in a single-arm feasibility trial (ENGAGE) of a guided, internet-administered, cognitive–behavioural therapy-based intervention for parents of children treated for cancer. Secondary objectives examined reasons for non-participation.

          Design

          A cross-sectional survey nested within the ENGAGE feasibility trial.

          Setting

          The intervention was delivered from Uppsala University, with parents located throughout Sweden.

          Participants

          Potential participants were recruited 3 months–5 years following their child ending treatment for cancer and were identified via their personal identification number (via the Swedish Childhood Cancer Registry and Swedish Tax Agency) and invited via postal invitation packs and could opt out via post, online, telephone or email. Those who did not opt out or consent, within 4 weeks, received up to five telephone calls and/or one postal reminder.

          Results

          Of 509 invited, 164 (32.2%) opted out, 78 (47.6%) via post, 53 (32.3%) via telephone, 24 (14.6%) online, and 6 (3.7%) via email, 88 (53.7%) opted out after at least one telephone call and/or postal reminder. There was a trend for parents with lower educational levels to opt out. No need of psychological support, lack of time, and no interest in internet-administered self-help were frequently reported reasons for non-participation.

          Conclusions

          Results emphasise the importance of using different opt-out modes and suggest future research should consider how to widen study participation for parents with lower education levels. Self-identifying a need for psychological support and the acceptability of internet-administered self-help are important factors for participation and should be considered in future research to increase recruitment.

          Trial registration number

          ISRCTN57233429.

          Related collections

          Most cited references84

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The qualitative content analysis process.

          This paper is a description of inductive and deductive content analysis. Content analysis is a method that may be used with either qualitative or quantitative data and in an inductive or deductive way. Qualitative content analysis is commonly used in nursing studies but little has been published on the analysis process and many research books generally only provide a short description of this method. When using content analysis, the aim was to build a model to describe the phenomenon in a conceptual form. Both inductive and deductive analysis processes are represented as three main phases: preparation, organizing and reporting. The preparation phase is similar in both approaches. The concepts are derived from the data in inductive content analysis. Deductive content analysis is used when the structure of analysis is operationalized on the basis of previous knowledge. Inductive content analysis is used in cases where there are no previous studies dealing with the phenomenon or when it is fragmented. A deductive approach is useful if the general aim was to test a previous theory in a different situation or to compare categories at different time periods.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance

            Evaluating complex interventions is complicated. The Medical Research Council's evaluation framework (2000) brought welcome clarity to the task. Now the council has updated its guidance
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials.

              The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement is used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomized, controlled trials. Schulz and colleagues describe the latest version, CONSORT 2010, which updates the reporting guideline based on new methodological evidence and accumulating experience.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2022
                1 April 2022
                : 12
                : 4
                : e056758
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentHealthcare Sciences and e-Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health , Uppsala University , Uppsala, Sweden
                [2 ]departmentDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine , TYKS Turku University Hospital , Turku, Finland
                [3 ]departmentPediatric Oncology and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health , Karolinska Institute , Stockholm, Sweden
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Professor Louise von Essen; louise-von.essen@ 123456kbh.uu.se

                JH and JW are joint first authors.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5062-6798
                Article
                bmjopen-2021-056758
                10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056758
                8977820
                35365530
                1185188e-856e-4d0c-a6c1-a18350c9e1ac
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 24 August 2021
                : 10 March 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100006313, Barncancerfonden;
                Award ID: PR2017-0005
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002794, Cancerfonden;
                Award ID: 150673
                Award ID: 180589
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004359, Vetenskapsrådet;
                Award ID: 2009–1093
                Award ID: 2018-02578
                Award ID: K2015-99X-20836-08-4
                Categories
                Mental Health
                1506
                1712
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                depression & mood disorders,statistics & research methods,qualitative research,paediatric oncology

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content14

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors1,141