3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Digital Diagnostic Techniques

      Submit here before August 31, 2024

      About Pathobiology5.0 Impact Factor I 7.7 CiteScore I 1.088 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      Are you tired of sifting through news that doesn't interest you?
      Personalize your Karger newsletter today and get only the news that matters to you!

      Sign up

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Patient-Reported Outcomes of Medical Tattooing for Capillary Malformations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Patients with capillary malformations (CMs) may undergo medical tattooing (MT) as an alternative to laser therapy. But little is known about treatment results and impact from the patients’ perspective.

          Objectives

          In this cross-sectional digital survey study, we evaluated the patient-reported outcomes of MT for CMs.

          Methods

          MT practices were identified via the Dutch Association of Skin Therapists and Google. These practices invited all their CM patients who had undergone MT between January 2011 and September 2021 to participate. Baseline and treatment characteristics, tattooing effectiveness, patient satisfaction with treatment outcomes, and complications were evaluated using a custom-made online survey. Quality of life was assessed with the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire. Factors associated with treatment effectiveness and patient satisfaction were identified via bivariate analysis and ordinal logistic regression analysis.

          Results

          Most of the 89 respondents were female (69%). Almost all CMs were located on the face (90%) and mainly (dark) red (74%). Nearly all patients had undergone laser therapy (91%). Median number of tattooing sessions was 5 (IQR: 4.0–8.0). Thirty-seven percent of the patients perceived >75% color reduction. Younger patients were more likely to obtain lower treatment effectiveness (OR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.20–0.97). Most patients (83%) were satisfied with treatment results. Patients with lighter (OR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13–0.72), non-facial (OR 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03–0.89), and hypertrophic CMs (OR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11–0.82) were less likely to be satisfied with treatment outcomes. Patients with lighter skin types were more satisfied (OR 2.89, 95% CI: 1.23–6.80). Complications included transient pain (23%), bleeding (3.4%), hypertrophic scarring (1.1%), hypopigmentation (1.1%), and a halo around the tattoo (1.1%).

          Conclusion

          MT seems a valid alternative treatment in addition to laser therapy for CMs, with mild complications. Most patients are (very) satisfied with treatment results, while color reduction is incomplete. Hence, it seems appropriate to decide together with patients whether or not to use MT as primary treatment or secondary to laser therapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)--a simple practical measure for routine clinical use.

          A simple practical questionnaire technique for routine clinical use, the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is described. One hundred and twenty patients with different skin diseases were asked about the impact of their disease and its treatment on their lives; a questionnaire, the DLQI, was developed based on their answers. The DLQI was then completed by 200 consecutive new patients attending a dermatology clinic. This study confirmed that atopic eczema, psoriasis and generalized pruritus have a greater impact on quality of life than acne, basal cell carcinomas and viral warts. The DLQI was also completed by 100 healthy volunteers; their mean score was very low (1.6%, s.d. 3.5) compared with the mean score for the dermatology patients (24.2%, s.d. 20.9). The reliability of the DLQI was examined in 53 patients using a 1 week test-retest method and reliability was found to be high (gamma s = 0.99).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

            In recent years, there has been an increased focus on placing patients at the center of health care research and evaluating clinical care in order to improve their experience and ensure that research is both robust and of maximum value for the use of medicinal products, therapy, or health services. This paper provides an overview of patients’ involvement in clinical research and service evaluation along with its benefits and limitations. We describe and discuss patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the trends in current research. Both the patient-reported experiences measures (PREMs) and patient and public involvement (PPI) initiative for including patients in the research processes are also outlined. PROs provide reports from patients about their own health, quality of life, or functional status associated with the health care or treatment they have received. PROMs are tools and/or instruments used to report PROs. Patient report experiences through the use of PREMs, such as satisfaction scales, providing insight into the patients’ experience with their care or a health service. There is increasing international attention regarding the use of PREMS as a quality indicator of patient care and safety. This reflects the ongoing health service commitment of involving patients and the public within the wider context of the development and evaluation of health care service delivery and quality improvement.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS).

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Dermatology
                Dermatology
                DRM
                DRM
                Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)
                S. Karger AG (Basel, Switzerland )
                1018-8665
                1421-9832
                13 July 2023
                October 2023
                : 239
                : 5
                : 768-781
                Affiliations
                [a ]Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [b ]Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [c ]Faculty of Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [d ]Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [e ]Amsterdam Public Health, Immunity and Infections, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [f ]Medical Tattoo Innovations, Goes, The Netherlands
                [g ]Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
                [h ]Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [i ]Plastic Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Admiraal de Ruyter Hospital, Goes, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Ginger Beau Langbroek, g.b.langbroek@ 123456amsterdamumc.nl

                Dirk T. Ubbink and Chantal M.A.M. van der Horst should be considered joint senior/last authors.

                Article
                530609
                10.1159/000530609
                10614224
                37442102
                13216e81-2bbe-4f3a-a7e7-8002f8ca9ec4
                © 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel

                This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) ( http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage, derivative works and distribution are permitted provided that proper credit is given to the author and the original publisher.

                History
                : 22 November 2022
                : 20 March 2023
                : 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 6, References: 36, Pages: 14
                Funding
                No funding was received.
                Categories
                Tattoo and Body Art – Research Article

                Dermatology
                capillary malformations,port-wine stains,medical tattooing,patient-reported outcomes,patient satisfaction

                Comments

                Comment on this article