14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Cross-border fertility care—International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies global survey: 2006 data and estimates

      , , ,
      Fertility and Sterility
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To collect data on the prevalence and reasons for cross-border fertility care (CBFC). Retrospective survey conducted by the International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Forty-nine countries who have previously participated with the International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Number of CBFC patients per country. Questionnaire. Number of CBFC patients and reason for travel. The majority of replies were comprised of estimates for incoming and outgoing patients having CBFC. The main reasons for leaving a home country for CBFC included treatment anonymity and legality issues, whereas incoming patients most often traveled due to efficacy and access. Few countries are able to quantify numbers of patients having CBFC, although our data suggest that incoming treatment seekers are more easily numerated due to clinic registration procedures. Standardization of data collection and creation of national databases are needed to collect quantitative information that will help reproductive caregivers to provide support for patients having CBFC. Copyright (c) 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Fertility and Sterility
          Fertility and Sterility
          Elsevier BV
          00150282
          June 2010
          June 2010
          : 94
          : 1
          : e4-e10
          Article
          10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.049
          20153467
          16d05f8f-3a44-4ed3-8f28-bd7649d19e40
          © 2010

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article