8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      New insights into the activities and toxicities of the old anticancer drug doxorubicin

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The anthracycline drug doxorubicin is an effective anticancer drugs with both DNA‐ and chromatin‐damaging activity. While the chromatin‐damaging activity constitutes major anticancer efficacy of doxorubicin, combination with the DNA‐damaging activity plagues the drug with long‐term toxicities such as cardiotoxicity, therapy‐related malignancies and gonadotoxicity. Therefore, developing DNA damage‐free anthracyclines is a promising direction for novel treatment options with limited side effects, which has been shown to be possible.

          Abstract

          The anthracycline drug doxorubicin is among the most used—and useful—chemotherapeutics. While doxorubicin is highly effective in the treatment of various hematopoietic malignancies and solid tumours, its application is limited by severe adverse effects, including irreversible cardiotoxicity, therapy‐related malignancies and gonadotoxicity. This continues to motivate investigation into the mechanisms of anthracycline activities and toxicities, with the aim to overcome the latter without sacrificing the former. It has long been appreciated that doxorubicin causes DNA double‐strand breaks due to poisoning topoisomerase II. More recently, it became clear that doxorubicin also leads to chromatin damage achieved through eviction of histones from select sites in the genome. Evaluation of these activities in various anthracycline analogues has revealed that chromatin damage makes a major contribution to the efficacy of anthracycline drugs. Furthermore, the DNA‐damaging effect conspires with chromatin damage to cause a number of adverse effects. Structure–activity relationships within the anthracycline family offer opportunities for chemical separation of these activities towards development of effective analogues with limited adverse effects. In this review, we elaborate on our current understanding of the different activities of doxorubicin and their contributions to drug efficacy and side effects. We then offer our perspective on how the activities of this old anticancer drug can be amended in new ways to benefit cancer patients, by providing effective treatment with improved quality of life.

          Related collections

          Most cited references149

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution.

          The X-ray crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle of chromatin shows in atomic detail how the histone protein octamer is assembled and how 146 base pairs of DNA are organized into a superhelix around it. Both histone/histone and histone/DNA interactions depend on the histone fold domains and additional, well ordered structure elements extending from this motif. Histone amino-terminal tails pass over and between the gyres of the DNA superhelix to contact neighbouring particles. The lack of uniformity between multiple histone/DNA-binding sites causes the DNA to deviate from ideal superhelix geometry.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Calreticulin exposure dictates the immunogenicity of cancer cell death.

            Anthracyclin-treated tumor cells are particularly effective in eliciting an anticancer immune response, whereas other DNA-damaging agents such as etoposide and mitomycin C do not induce immunogenic cell death. Here we show that anthracyclins induce the rapid, preapoptotic translocation of calreticulin (CRT) to the cell surface. Blockade or knockdown of CRT suppressed the phagocytosis of anthracyclin-treated tumor cells by dendritic cells and abolished their immunogenicity in mice. The anthracyclin-induced CRT translocation was mimicked by inhibition of the protein phosphatase 1/GADD34 complex. Administration of recombinant CRT or inhibitors of protein phosphatase 1/GADD34 restored the immunogenicity of cell death elicited by etoposide and mitomycin C, and enhanced their antitumor effects in vivo. These data identify CRT as a key feature determining anticancer immune responses and delineate a possible strategy for immunogenic chemotherapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Immunological Effects of Conventional Chemotherapy and Targeted Anticancer Agents.

              The tremendous clinical success of checkpoint blockers illustrates the potential of reestablishing latent immunosurveillance for cancer therapy. Although largely neglected in the clinical practice, accumulating evidence indicates that the efficacy of conventional and targeted anticancer agents does not only involve direct cytostatic/cytotoxic effects, but also relies on the (re)activation of tumor-targeting immune responses. Chemotherapy can promote such responses by increasing the immunogenicity of malignant cells, or by inhibiting immunosuppressive circuitries that are established by developing neoplasms. These immunological "side" effects of chemotherapy are desirable, and their in-depth comprehension will facilitate the design of novel combinatorial regimens with improved clinical efficacy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                j.j.c.neefjes@lumc.nl
                Journal
                FEBS J
                FEBS J
                10.1111/(ISSN)1742-4658
                FEBS
                The Febs Journal
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1742-464X
                1742-4658
                19 October 2020
                November 2021
                : 288
                : 21 , Cancer Therapeutics ( doiID: 10.1111/febs.v288.21 )
                : 6095-6111
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Cell and Chemical Biology ONCODE Institute Leiden University Medical Centre LUMC The Netherlands
                [ 2 ] Division of Tumour Biology and Immunology The Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
                [ 3 ] Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery The Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                J. Neefjes, Department of Cell and Chemical Biology, ONCODE Institute, Leiden University Medical Centre LUMC, Einthovenweg 20, 2333 ZC Leiden, The Netherlands

                Tel: +31 71 52668722

                E‐mail: j.j.c.neefjes@ 123456lumc.nl

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5587-1514
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8690-4179
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6763-2211
                Article
                FEBS15583
                10.1111/febs.15583
                8597086
                33022843
                17b8359f-fd41-4579-a4a9-f57db0388e22
                © 2020 The Authors. The FEBS Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 10 September 2020
                : 15 July 2020
                : 30 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Pages: 17, Words: 11465
                Funding
                Funded by: KWF Kankerbestrijding , doi 10.13039/501100004622;
                Funded by: Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek , doi 10.13039/501100003246;
                Funded by: ERC advance grand
                Categories
                State‐of‐the‐Art Review
                State‐of‐the‐Art Reviews
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                November 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.9 mode:remove_FC converted:17.11.2021

                Molecular biology
                aclarubicin,anthracyclines,cancer,cardiotoxicity,chromatin damage,dna damage,doxorubicin,histone eviction,therapy‐related tumours,topoisomerase ii

                Comments

                Comment on this article