15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Stigma reduction in relation to HIV test uptake in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This realist review was conducted to understand how stigma is reduced in relation to HIV test uptake in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

          Methods

          A systematic search of eight databases resulted in 34 articles considered for synthesis. Data synthesis was guided by a preliminary programme theory and included coding the meaning units to develop themes or intervention pathways that corresponded to context-mechanism-outcome configurations.

          Results

          We found that the interventions produced an effect through two pathways: (a) knowledge leads to changes in stigmatizing attitudes and increases in HIV test uptake and (b) knowledge and attitudes lead to changes in stigmatizing behaviours and lead to HIV test uptake. We also found one competing pathway that illustrated the direct impact of knowledge on HIV test uptake without changing stigmatizing attitudes and behaviour. The identified pathways were found to be influenced by some structural factors (e.g., anti-homosexuality laws, country-specific HIV testing programmes and policies), community factors (e.g., traditional beliefs and practices, sexual taboos and prevalence of intimate partner violence) and target-population characteristics (e.g., age, income and urban-rural residence).

          Conclusions

          The pathways and underlying mechanisms support the adaptation of intervention strategies in terms of social context and the target population in LMICs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Realist review--a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions.

          Evidence-based policy is a dominant theme in contemporary public services but the practical realities and challenges involved in using evidence in policy-making are formidable. Part of the problem is one of complexity. In health services and other public services, we are dealing with complex social interventions which act on complex social systems--things like league tables, performance measures, regulation and inspection, or funding reforms. These are not 'magic bullets' which will always hit their target, but programmes whose effects are crucially dependent on context and implementation. Traditional methods of review focus on measuring and reporting on programme effectiveness, often find that the evidence is mixed or conflicting, and provide little or no clue as to why the intervention worked or did not work when applied in different contexts or circumstances, deployed by different stakeholders, or used for different purposes. This paper offers a model of research synthesis which is designed to work with complex social interventions or programmes, and which is based on the emerging 'realist' approach to evaluation. It provides an explanatory analysis aimed at discerning what works for whom, in what circumstances, in what respects and how. The first step is to make explicit the programme theory (or theories)--the underlying assumptions about how an intervention is meant to work and what impacts it is expected to have. We then look for empirical evidence to populate this theoretical framework, supporting, contradicting or modifying the programme theories as it goes. The results of the review combine theoretical understanding and empirical evidence, and focus on explaining the relationship between the context in which the intervention is applied, the mechanisms by which it works and the outcomes which are produced. The aim is to enable decision-makers to reach a deeper understanding of the intervention and how it can be made to work most effectively. Realist review does not provide simple answers to complex questions. It will not tell policy-makers or managers whether something works or not, but will provide the policy and practice community with the kind of rich, detailed and highly practical understanding of complex social interventions which is likely to be of much more use to them when planning and implementing programmes at a national, regional or local level.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            HIV and AIDS-related stigma and discrimination: a conceptual framework and implications for action

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Health-related stigma.

              The concept of stigma, denoting relations of shame, has a long ancestry and has from the earliest times been associated with deviations from the 'normal', including, in various times and places, deviations from normative prescriptions of acceptable states of being for self and others. This paper dwells on modern social formations and offers conceptual and theoretical pointers towards a more convincing contemporary sociology of health-related stigma. It starts with an appreciation and critique of Goffman's benchmark sensitisation and traces his influence on the personal tragedy or deviance paradigm dominant in the medical sociology from the 1970s. To allow for the development of an argument, the focus here is on specific types of disorder--principally, epilepsy and HIV--rather than the research literature as a whole. Brief and critical consideration is given to attempts to operationalise or otherwise 'measure' health-related stigma. The advocacy of a rival oppression paradigm by disability theorists from the 1980s, notably through re-workings of the social model of disability, is addressed. It is suggested that we are now in a position to learn and move on from this paradigm 'clash'. A re-framing of notions of relations of stigma, signalling shame, and relations of deviance, signalling blame, is proposed. This framework, and the positing of a variable and changing dynamic between cultural norms of shame and blame--always embedded in social structures of class, command, gender, ethnicity and so on--is utilised to explore recent approaches to health stigma reduction programmes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +4571699469 , soobesh@gmail.com , sthapa@health.sdu.dk
                karin.hannes@kuleuven.be
                margaret.cargo@canberra.edu.au
                abuve@itg.be
                sanne.peters@kuleuven.be
                stephanie.dauphin@kuleuven.be
                catharina.mathei@kuleuven.be
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                20 November 2018
                20 November 2018
                2018
                : 18
                : 1277
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0728 0170, GRID grid.10825.3e, Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, , University of Southern Denmark, ; Odense, 5000 Denmark
                [2 ]Social Research Methodology Group, Faculty of Social Sciences, KU Leuven, Parkstraat 45, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0385 7472, GRID grid.1039.b, Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, ; University Drive, 22-B17, Bruce, ACT 2601 Australia
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2153 5088, GRID grid.11505.30, Department of Public Health, , Institute of Tropical Medicine, ; Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
                [5 ]Department of Public Health and Primary care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1182-8511
                Article
                6156
                10.1186/s12889-018-6156-4
                6245520
                30453923
                1822b9e5-b2b9-4b49-a86d-1c98f3ed6a9a
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 10 January 2018
                : 26 October 2018
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Public health
                context-mechanism-outcome configurations,hiv test uptake,low- and middle-income countries,realist review,and stigma reduction interventions

                Comments

                Comment on this article