29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Isolated hepatic perfusion as a treatment for uveal melanoma liver metastases (the SCANDIUM trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Despite successful control of the primary tumor, metastatic disease will ultimately develop in approximately 50% of patients, with the liver being the most common site for metastases. The median survival for patients with liver metastases is between 6 and 12 months, and no treatment has in randomized trials ever been shown to prolong survival. A previous phase II trial using isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) has suggested a 14-month increase in overall survival compared with a historic control group consisting of the longest surviving patients in Sweden during the same time period (26 versus 12 months).

          Methods/Design

          This is the protocol for a multicenter phase III trial randomizing patients with isolated liver metastases of uveal melanoma to IHP or best alternative care (BAC). Inclusion criteria include liver metastases (verified by biopsy) and no evidence of extra-hepatic tumor manifestations by positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT). The primary endpoint is overall survival at 24 months, with secondary endpoints including response rate, progression-free survival, and quality of life. The planned sample size is 78 patients throughout five years.

          Discussion

          Patients with isolated liver metastases of uveal melanoma origin have a short expected survival and no standard treatment option exists. This is the first randomized clinical trial to evaluate IHP as a treatment option with overall survival being the primary endpoint.

          Trial registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01785316 (registered 1 February 2013). EudraCT registration number: 2013-000564-29.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Mutations in GNA11 in uveal melanoma.

          Uveal melanoma is the most common intraocular cancer. There are no effective therapies for metastatic disease. Mutations in GNAQ, the gene encoding an alpha subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins, are found in 40% of uveal melanomas. We sequenced exon 5 of GNAQ and GNA11, a paralogue of GNAQ, in 713 melanocytic neoplasms of different types (186 uveal melanomas, 139 blue nevi, 106 other nevi, and 282 other melanomas). We sequenced exon 4 of GNAQ and GNA11 in 453 of these samples and in all coding exons of GNAQ and GNA11 in 97 uveal melanomas and 45 blue nevi. We found somatic mutations in exon 5 (affecting Q209) and in exon 4 (affecting R183) in both GNA11 and GNAQ, in a mutually exclusive pattern. Mutations affecting Q209 in GNA11 were present in 7% of blue nevi, 32% of primary uveal melanomas, and 57% of uveal melanoma metastases. In contrast, we observed Q209 mutations in GNAQ in 55% of blue nevi, 45% of uveal melanomas, and 22% of uveal melanoma metastases. Mutations affecting R183 in either GNAQ or GNA11 were less prevalent (2% of blue nevi and 6% of uveal melanomas) than the Q209 mutations. Mutations in GNA11 induced spontaneously metastasizing tumors in a mouse model and activated the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Of the uveal melanomas we analyzed, 83% had somatic mutations in GNAQ or GNA11. Constitutive activation of the pathway involving these two genes appears to be a major contributor to the development of uveal melanoma. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The COMS randomized trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma, III: initial mortality findings. COMS Report No. 18.

            To report initial mortality findings from the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) randomized clinical trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy vs enucleation for treatment of choroidal melanoma. Patients were evaluated for eligibility at 43 participating clinical centers in the United States and Canada. Eligible consenting patients were assigned randomly at the time of enrollment to enucleation or 125I brachytherapy. Patients were examined at specified intervals after enrollment for data collection purposes. Findings presented herein are based on data received by September 30, 2000. Data for each patient were analyzed with the treatment group to which the patient was assigned randomly at the time of enrollment. During the 11(1/2)-year accrual period, 1317 patients enrolled; 660 were assigned randomly to enucleation and 657 to 125I brachytherapy. Only 2 patients in the enucleation arm were found to have been misdiagnosed when histopathology was reviewed centrally. All but 17 patients (1.3%) received the assigned treatment. Adherence to the brachytherapy protocol was excellent, with 91% of patients treated per protocol. Based on time since enrollment, 1072 patients (81%) had been followed for mortality for 5 years and 416 (32%) for 10 years. A total of 364 patients had died: 188 (28%) of 660 patients in the enucleation arm and 176 (27%) of 657 patients in the brachytherapy arm. The unadjusted estimated 5-year survival rates were 81% and 82%, respectively; there was no clinically or statistically significant difference in survival rates overall (P =.48, log-rank test). The adjusted estimated risk ratio for 125I brachytherapy vs enucleation was 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-1.22). Five-year rates of death with histopathologically confirmed melanoma metastasis were 11% and 9% following enucleation and brachytherapy, respectively; after adjustment, the estimated risk ratio was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.66-1.24). Mortality rates following 125I brachytherapy did not differ from mortality rates following enucleation for up to 12 years after treatment of patients with choroidal melanoma who enrolled in this COMS trial. The power of the study was sufficient to indicate that neither treatment is likely to increase or decrease mortality rates by as much as 25% relative to the other.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Surgical management of liver metastases from uveal melanoma: 16 years' experience at the Institut Curie.

              Uveal melanoma is characterised by a high prevalence of liver metastases and a poor prognosis. To review the evolving surgical management of this challenging condition at a single institution over a 16-year period. Between January 1991 and June 2007, among 3873 patients with uveal melanoma, 798 patients had liver metastases. We undertook a detailed retrospective review of their clinical records and surgical procedures. The data was evaluated with both uni- and multivariate statistical analysis for predictive survival indicators. 255 patients underwent surgical resection. The median interval between ocular tumour diagnosis and liver surgery was 68 months (range 19-81). Liver surgery was either microscopically complete (R0; n = 76), microscopically incomplete (R1; n = 22) or macroscopically incomplete (R2; n = 157). The median overall postoperative survival was 14 months, but increased to 27 months when R0 resection was possible. With multivariate analysis, four variables were found to independently correlate with prolonged survival: an interval from primary tumour diagnosis to liver metastases >24 months, comprehensiveness of surgical resection (R0), number of metastases resected (< or = 4) and absence of miliary disease. Surgical resection, when possible, is able to almost double the survival and appears at present the optimal way of improving the prognosis in metastatic uveal melanoma. Advances in medical treatments will be required to further improve survival.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                roger.olofsson@surgery.gu.se
                lars.ny@oncology.gu.se
                malin.sternby@vgregion.se
                magnus.rizell@surgery.gu.se
                christian.cahlin@vgregion.se
                ulrika.stierner@bredband.net
                ulf.lonn@lio.se
                johan.hansson@ki.se
                ingrid.ljuslinder@vll.se
                lotta.lundgren@med.lu.se
                gustav.ullenhag@onkologi.uu.se
                jens.folke.kiilgaard@regionh.dk
                jonas.nilsson@surgery.gu.se
                per.lindner@surgery.gu.se
                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central (London )
                1745-6215
                9 August 2014
                9 August 2014
                2014
                : 15
                : 1
                : 317
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Blå stråket 5, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
                [ ]Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Blå stråket 5, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
                [ ]Transplant Institute, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
                [ ]Department of Oncology, Linköping University Hospital, Garnisonsvägen 10, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden
                [ ]Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska vägen, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
                [ ]Department of Oncology, Norrlands University Hospital, 901 85 Umeå, Sweden
                [ ]Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Getingevägen 4, 221 85 Lund, Sweden
                [ ]Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Science, Section of Oncology, Uppsala University, 751 05 Uppsala, Sweden
                [ ]Department of Ophthalmology, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital Glostrup, Nordre Ringvej 57, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark
                [ ]Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Medicinaregatan 1F, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
                Article
                2194
                10.1186/1745-6215-15-317
                4138407
                25106493
                18b60292-d738-4a48-878b-082eec0db13f
                © Olofsson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

                This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 7 April 2014
                : 25 July 2014
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2014

                Medicine
                uveal melanoma,liver metastases,isolated hepatic perfusion,regional treatment
                Medicine
                uveal melanoma, liver metastases, isolated hepatic perfusion, regional treatment

                Comments

                Comment on this article