6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Associations of risk perception of COVID-19 with emotion and mental health during the pandemic

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • Risk perception of COVID-19 was associated with more negative/less positive emotions.

          • Risk perception of COVID-19 was inversely associated with subsequent mental health.

          • The association between risk perception and mental health was mediated by emotions.

          • Specification curve analysis was used to avoid subjective analytical decisions.

          Abstract

          Background

          Although there are increasing concerns on mental health consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, no large-scale population-based studies have examined the associations of risk perception of COVID-19 with emotion and subsequent mental health.

          Methods

          : This study analysed cross-sectional and longitudinal data from the PsyCorona Survey that included 54,845 participants from 112 countries, of which 23,278 participants are representative samples of 24 countries in terms of gender and age. Specification curve analysis (SCA) was used to examine associations of risk perception of COVID-19 with emotion and self-rated mental health. This robust method considers all reasonable model specifications to avoid subjective analytical decisions while accounting for multiple testing.

          Results

          : All 162 multilevel linear regressions in the SCA indicated that higher risk perception of COVID-19 was significantly associated with less positive or more negative emotions (median standardised β=-0.171, median SE=0.004, P<0.001). Specifically, regressions involving economic risk perception and negative emotions revealed stronger associations. Moreover, risk perception at baseline survey was inversely associated with subsequent mental health (standardised β=-0.214, SE=0.029, P<0.001). We further used SCA to explore whether this inverse association was mediated by emotional distress. Among the 54 multilevel linear regressions of mental health on risk perception and emotion, 42 models showed a strong mediation effect, where no significant direct effect of risk perception was found after controlling for emotion ( P>0.05).

          Limitations

          Reliance on self-reported data.

          Conclusions

          : Risk perception of COVID-19 was associated with emotion and ultimately mental health. Interventions on reducing excessive risk perception and managing emotional distress could promote mental health.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.

          In recent studies of the structure of affect, positive and negative affect have consistently emerged as two dominant and relatively independent dimensions. A number of mood scales have been created to measure these factors; however, many existing measures are inadequate, showing low reliability or poor convergent or discriminant validity. To fill the need for reliable and valid Positive Affect and Negative Affect scales that are also brief and easy to administer, we developed two 10-item mood scales that comprise the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). The scales are shown to be highly internally consistent, largely uncorrelated, and stable at appropriate levels over a 2-month time period. Normative data and factorial and external evidence of convergent and discriminant validity for the scales are also presented.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)

            Analogous to checklists of recommendations such as the CONSORT statement (for randomized trials), or the QUORUM statement (for systematic reviews), which are designed to ensure the quality of reports in the medical literature, a checklist of recommendations for authors is being presented by the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) in an effort to ensure complete descriptions of Web-based surveys. Papers on Web-based surveys reported according to the CHERRIES statement will give readers a better understanding of the sample (self-)selection and its possible differences from a “representative” sample. It is hoped that author adherence to the checklist will increase the usefulness of such reports.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A circumplex model of affect.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Affect Disord
                J Affect Disord
                Journal of Affective Disorders
                Elsevier B.V.
                0165-0327
                1573-2517
                26 January 2021
                26 January 2021
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
                [2 ]Ageing Epidemiology Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
                [3 ]Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
                [4 ]Department of Psychology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
                [5 ]Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Bang Zheng, : Tel: +44 7517545806.
                [#]

                The full co-author list of the PsyCorona team is displayed in Supplementary Material.

                Article
                S0165-0327(21)00066-5
                10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.049
                7834977
                33602537
                197dd68f-d4ba-4b78-aa9a-eb15009fa5dc
                © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 8 October 2020
                : 17 January 2021
                : 20 January 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                covid-19,risk perception,emotion,mental health
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                covid-19, risk perception, emotion, mental health

                Comments

                Comment on this article