Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Can measures of the grocery store environment be used to track community-level dietary changes?

      Preventive Medicine
      Advertising as Topic, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet Surveys, Dietary Fats, administration & dosage, Dietary Fiber, Environment, Follow-Up Studies, Food Habits, Food Supply, Humans, Nutritional Sciences, education, Reproducibility of Results, Telephone

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article examines whether an in-store unobtrusive survey of grocery store product displays can be used to track community-level dietary behavior. The survey was conducted in 12 western communities two different times to measure two aspects of the grocery store environment: (a) the relative availability of low-fat and high-fiber products and (b) the amount of store-provided health-education information. Self-reported dietary intake of residents was obtained in the same 12 communities using a telephone survey. We compared the individual and store-level measures both cross-sectionally and over time. We found positive and statistically significant correlations between the availability of healthful products in stores and the reported healthfulness of individual diets in cross-sectional analyses, but correlations between changes over time in the two measures were weaker and not statistically significant. The variance of the grocery store measures was nonetheless sufficiently small that a grocery store survey of 15 stores in each of 8 communities (n = 120 surveys) had power comparable to that of a telephone survey of 200 individuals/community (n = 1,600) surveys, at a fraction of the cost. Although the results provide further validation of cross-sectional measures of the grocery store environment, additional efforts are required to establish the validity of the grocery store survey as a method of measuring dietary change.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article