357
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Understanding integrated care: a comprehensive conceptual framework based on the integrative functions of primary care

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Primary care has a central role in integrating care within a health system. However, conceptual ambiguity regarding integrated care hampers a systematic understanding. This paper proposes a conceptual framework that combines the concepts of primary care and integrated care, in order to understand the complexity of integrated care.

          Methods

          The search method involved a combination of electronic database searches, hand searches of reference lists (snowball method) and contacting researchers in the field. The process of synthesizing the literature was iterative, to relate the concepts of primary care and integrated care. First, we identified the general principles of primary care and integrated care. Second, we connected the dimensions of integrated care and the principles of primary care. Finally, to improve content validity we held several meetings with researchers in the field to develop and refine our conceptual framework.

          Results

          The conceptual framework combines the functions of primary care with the dimensions of integrated care. Person-focused and population-based care serve as guiding principles for achieving integration across the care continuum. Integration plays complementary roles on the micro (clinical integration), meso (professional and organisational integration) and macro (system integration) level. Functional and normative integration ensure connectivity between the levels.

          Discussion

          The presented conceptual framework is a first step to achieve a better understanding of the inter-relationships among the dimensions of integrated care from a primary care perspective.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms.

          Self-management has become a popular term for behavioral interventions as well as for healthful behaviors. This is especially true for the management of chronic conditions. This article offers a short history of self-management. It presents three self-management tasks--medical management, role management, and emotional management--and six self-management skills--problem solving, decision making, resource utilization, the formation of a patient-provider partnership, action planning, and self-tailoring. In addition, the article presents evidence of the effectiveness of self-management interventions and posits a possible mechanism, self-efficacy, through which these interventions work. In conclusion the article discusses problems and solutions for integrating self-management education into the mainstream health care systems.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients: a review of systematic reviews.

            To investigate effectiveness, definitions, and components of integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients on the basis of systematic reviews. Literature review from January 1996 to May 2004. Definitions and components of integrated care programmes and all effects reported on the quality of care. Searches in the Medline and Cochrane databases identified 13 systematic reviews of integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients. Despite considerable heterogeneity in interventions, patient populations, and processes and outcomes of care, integrated care programmes seemed to have positive effects on the quality of patient care. No consistent definitions were present for the management of patients with chronic illnesses. In all the reviews the aims of integrated care programmes were very similar, namely reducing fragmentation and improving continuity and coordination of care, but the focus and content of the programmes differed widely. The most common components of integrated care programmes were self-management support and patient education, often combined with structured clinical follow-up and case management; a multidisciplinary patient care team; multidisciplinary clinical pathways and feedback, reminders, and education for professionals. Integrated care programmes seemed to have positive effects on the quality of care. However, integrated care programmes have widely varying definitions and components and failure to recognize these variations leads to inappropriate conclusions about the effectiveness of these programmes and to inappropriate application of research results. To compare programmes and better understand the (cost) effectiveness of the programmes, consistent definitions must be used and component interventions must be well described.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The problem of fragmentation and the need for integrative solutions.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Researcher
                Role: Researcher
                Role: Senior Partner
                Role: Director
                Journal
                Int J Integr Care
                Int J Integr Care
                IJIC
                International Journal of Integrated Care
                Igitur publishing (Utrecht, The Netherlands )
                1568-4156
                Jan-Mar 2013
                22 March 2013
                : 13
                : e010
                Affiliations
                Jan van Es Institute, Netherlands Expert Centre Integrated Primary Care, The Netherlands
                NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, The Netherlands
                Twynstra Gudde, Consultants and Managers, The Netherlands
                Jan van Es Institute, Netherlands Expert Centre Integrated Primary Care, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Pim P. Valentijn, Jan van Es Institute, Netherlands Expert Centre Integrated Primary Care, Randstad 2145-a, 1314 BG Almere, The Netherlands, E-mail: p.valentijn@ 123456jvei.nl
                Article
                ijic2013010
                10.5334/ijic.886
                3653278
                23687482
                1e83f3ae-a9e9-4104-9b42-6c0d1072b117
                Copyright 2013, Authors retain the copyright of their article

                This work is licensed under a ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0) Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License

                History
                : 29 May 2012
                : 19 February 2013
                : 20 February 2013
                Categories
                Research and Theory
                Custom metadata
                Int J Integr Care 2013; Jan–Mar, URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-114415

                Health & Social care
                primary care,integrated care,collaboration,fragmentation,care coordination
                Health & Social care
                primary care, integrated care, collaboration, fragmentation, care coordination

                Comments

                Comment on this article