0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Differences between whole body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) and chest/abdomen/pelvis computed tomography (CT)/bone scan (CT/B) in patients staged as having metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC): A retrospective comparative study within a single trust in the UK.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          37

          Background: Diagnostic imaging for metastases detection in HSPC varies across different countries with increasing use of WB-MRI and PSMA-PET. However, CT/B has still been the most used modality in the real world and recent registration clinical trials in this disease setting. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional retrospective descriptive study comparing WB-MRI with CT/B used as baseline staging modalities in patients diagnosed with mHSPC between February 2017 and August 2023 in two hospitals belonging to the same NHS trust in the UK routinely using one of the two. The study aimed at the detection of differences between the two modalities in the identification of metastatic sites and CHAARTED volume/LATITUDE risk, and the relative impact on patients’ received therapies and outcomes. Results: Of 213 patients diagnosed with mHSPC, 121 had baseline WB-MRI, 86 CT/B and 7 choline or PSMA PET. Compared to CT/B, patients staged by WB-MRI were diagnosed with significantly higher bone-only (47 vs 24%, p=0.002) and lower lymph-node only disease (11 vs 27%, p=0.005); higher high-volume (49 vs 21%, p<0.001) and -risk disease (48 vs 17%, p<0.001); higher de-novo metastatic disease (91 vs 66%, p<0.001); had previously received less radical surgery (2 vs 13%, p=0.003) or radiotherapy (7 vs 24%, p<0.001); received more frequently ADT plus Docetaxel (65 vs 44%, p=0.005). Treatment and outcome results in the overall cohorts’ populations and according to disease volume/risk will be presented. Conclusions: In a homogenous cohort of patients, we found a relevant discrepancy between the use of WB-MRI and CT/B in the identification of high-volume/risk and de-novo disease in mHSPC related to a higher detection rate of bone-only disease by the WB-MRI. This may prompt clinicians to offer different systemic therapies according to the disease burden and could also have a role in avoiding overtreatments for the under-staged disease.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          JCO
          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          February 01 2024
          February 01 2024
          : 42
          : 4_suppl
          : 37
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Portsmouth Hospital University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
          [2 ]University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southhampton, United Kingdom
          [3 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Cancer Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts, Health NHS Trust, London, UK., London, United Kingdom
          [4 ]Department of Oncology, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust; School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
          Article
          10.1200/JCO.2024.42.4_suppl.37
          1f152605-88c6-4e27-bd8d-37b6afefa75e
          © 2024
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article