25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Continuous versus intermittent renal replacement therapy: a meta-analysis.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Patients with critical illness commonly develop acute renal failure requiring mechanical support in the form of either continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) or intermittent hemodialysis (IRRT). As controversy exists regarding which modality should be used for most patients with critically illness, we sought to determine whether CRRT or IRRT is associated with better survival.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Intensive Care Med
          Intensive care medicine
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          0342-4642
          0342-4642
          Jan 2002
          : 28
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Division of Critical Care Medicine, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2582, USA. kellumja@anes.upmc.edu
          Article
          10.1007/s00134-001-1159-4
          11818996
          20931b68-20bf-4527-8d2c-2e3f40ecbe3d
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article