16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Evolutionary inevitability of sexual antagonism.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sexual antagonism, whereby mutations are favourable in one sex and disfavourable in the other, is common in natural populations, yet the root causes of sexual antagonism are rarely considered in evolutionary theories of adaptation. Here, we explore the evolutionary consequences of sex-differential selection and genotype-by-sex interactions for adaptation in species with separate sexes. We show that sexual antagonism emerges naturally from sex differences in the direction of selection on phenotypes expressed by both sexes or from sex-by-genotype interactions affecting the expression of such phenotypes. Moreover, modest sex differences in selection or genotype-by-sex effects profoundly influence the long-term evolutionary trajectories of populations with separate sexes, as these conditions trigger the evolution of strong sexual antagonism as a by-product of adaptively driven evolutionary change. The theory demonstrates that sexual antagonism is an inescapable by-product of adaptation in species with separate sexes, whether or not selection favours evolutionary divergence between males and females.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Proc. Biol. Sci.
          Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society
          1471-2954
          0962-8452
          Feb 7 2014
          : 281
          : 1776
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, , Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
          Article
          rspb.2013.2123
          10.1098/rspb.2013.2123
          24335980
          212fee06-5a42-415c-aef7-4871668d811e
          History

          Fisher's geometric model,adaptation,evolutionary constraint,intralocus sexual conflict,pleiotropy,sexual dimorphism

          Comments

          Comment on this article