7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Systems approaches to optimizing deep brain stimulation therapies in Parkinson’s disease

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="P1">Over the last thirty years, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been used to treat chronic neurological diseases like dystonia, obsessive-compulsive disorders, essential tremor, Parkinson’s disease, and more recently, dementias, depression, cognitive disorders, and epilepsy. Despite its wide use, DBS presents numerous challenges for both clinicians and engineers. One challenge is the design of novel, more efficient DBS therapies, which are hampered by the lack of complete understanding about the cellular mechanisms of therapeutic DBS. Another challenge is the existence of redundancy in clinical outcomes, i.e., different DBS programs can result in similar clinical benefits but very little information (e.g., predictive models, longitudinal data, metrics, etc.) is available to select one program over another. Finally, there is high variability in patients’ responses to DBS, which forces clinicians to carefully adjust the stimulation settings to each patient via lengthy programming sessions. Researchers in neural engineering and systems biology have been tackling these challenges over the past few years with the specific goal of developing novel DBS therapies, design methodologies, and computational tools that optimize the therapeutic effects of DBS in each patient. Furthermore, efforts are being made to automatically adapt the DBS treatment to the fluctuations of disease symptoms. A review of the quantitative approaches currently available for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease is presented here with an emphasis on the contributions that systems theoretical approaches have provided to understand the global dynamics of complex neuronal circuits in the brain under DBS. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references94

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A point process framework for relating neural spiking activity to spiking history, neural ensemble, and extrinsic covariate effects.

          Multiple factors simultaneously affect the spiking activity of individual neurons. Determining the effects and relative importance of these factors is a challenging problem in neurophysiology. We propose a statistical framework based on the point process likelihood function to relate a neuron's spiking probability to three typical covariates: the neuron's own spiking history, concurrent ensemble activity, and extrinsic covariates such as stimuli or behavior. The framework uses parametric models of the conditional intensity function to define a neuron's spiking probability in terms of the covariates. The discrete time likelihood function for point processes is used to carry out model fitting and model analysis. We show that, by modeling the logarithm of the conditional intensity function as a linear combination of functions of the covariates, the discrete time point process likelihood function is readily analyzed in the generalized linear model (GLM) framework. We illustrate our approach for both GLM and non-GLM likelihood functions using simulated data and multivariate single-unit activity data simultaneously recorded from the motor cortex of a monkey performing a visuomotor pursuit-tracking task. The point process framework provides a flexible, computationally efficient approach for maximum likelihood estimation, goodness-of-fit assessment, residual analysis, model selection, and neural decoding. The framework thus allows for the formulation and analysis of point process models of neural spiking activity that readily capture the simultaneous effects of multiple covariates and enables the assessment of their relative importance.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Deep brain stimulation.

            Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has provided remarkable benefits for people with a variety of neurologic conditions. Stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus can dramatically relieve tremor associated with essential tremor or Parkinson disease (PD). Similarly, stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus or the internal segment of the globus pallidus can substantially reduce bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, and gait difficulties in people with PD. Multiple groups are attempting to extend this mode of treatment to other conditions. Yet, the precise mechanism of action of DBS remains uncertain. Such studies have importance that extends beyond clinical therapeutics. Investigations of the mechanisms of action of DBS have the potential to clarify fundamental issues such as the functional anatomy of selected brain circuits and the relationship between activity in those circuits and behavior. Although we review relevant clinical issues, we emphasize the importance of current and future investigations on these topics.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cellular effects of deep brain stimulation: model-based analysis of activation and inhibition.

              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for medically refractory movement disorders. However, fundamental questions remain about the effects of DBS on neurons surrounding the electrode. Experimental studies have produced apparently contradictory results showing suppression of activity in the stimulated nucleus, but increased inputs to projection nuclei. We hypothesized that cell body firing does not accurately reflect the efferent output of neurons stimulated with high-frequency extracellular pulses, and that this decoupling of somatic and axonal activity explains the paradoxical experimental results. We studied stimulation using the combination of a finite-element model of the clinical DBS electrode and a multicompartment cable model of a thalamocortical (TC) relay neuron. Both the electric potentials generated by the electrode and a distribution of excitatory and inhibitory trans-synaptic inputs induced by stimulation of presynaptic terminals were applied to the TC relay neuron. The response of the neuron to DBS was primarily dependent on the position and orientation of the axon with respect to the electrode and the stimulation parameters. Stimulation subthreshold for direct activation of TC relay neurons caused suppression of intrinsic firing (tonic or burst) activity during the stimulus train mediated by activation of presynaptic terminals. Suprathreshold stimulation caused suppression of intrinsic firing in the soma, but generated efferent output at the stimulus frequency in the axon. This independence of firing in the cell body and axon resolves the apparently contradictory experimental results on the effects of DBS. In turn, the results of this study support the hypothesis of stimulation-induced modulation of pathological network activity as a therapeutic mechanism of DBS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine
                WIREs Syst Biol Med
                Wiley
                19395094
                March 20 2018
                : e1421
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Biomedical Engineering Department and CT Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences; University of Connecticut; Storrs Connecticut
                [2 ]Department of Neurosurgery; Emory University School of Medicine; Atlanta Georgia
                [3 ]Department of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine; Johns Hopkins University; Baltimore Maryland
                Article
                10.1002/wsbm.1421
                6148418
                29558564
                234b3aea-711f-4486-aef6-66c045b69b28
                © 2018

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article