7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Moral Sensitivity, Empathy and Prosocial Behavior: Implications for Humanization of Nursing Care

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Humanization of nursing is related to certain social and moral variables. Moral sensitivity, empathy, and prosocial behavior help understand a situation and make decisions that benefit the patient. The objective of this study is to find out how these variables are related, and define the differences in moral sensitivity, empathy, and prosocial behavior in humanization of nursing. We also analyzed the mediating role of empathy in the relationship between moral sensitivity and prosocial behavior. The sample was made up of 330 Spanish nurses aged 22 to 56, who completed the HUMAS Scale and adapted versions of the Basic Empathy Scale, the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire, and the Prosocial Behavior Scale. Descriptive analyses, bivariate correlations and multiple mediation models were calculated. The results found significantly different mean scores between all the groups in responsibility and moral strength, cognitive empathy, and prosocial behavior, and in moral burden, the differences were in the high-humanization-score group compared to the low-score group. Furthermore, the mediation models showed the mediating effect of cognitive empathy between the responsibility, strength, and moral burden factors on prosocial behavior, but not of affective empathy. The study concluded that humanization in nursing is closely related to moral sensitivity, cognitive empathy, and prosocial behavior. This facilitates a helping, caring, and understanding attitude toward patient needs, but without the affective flooding that affective empathy can lead to.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale.

          In developing the Basic Empathy Scale (BES), 40 items measuring affective and cognitive empathy were administered to 363 adolescents in Year 10 (aged about 15). Factor analysis reduced this to a 20-item scale that was administered 1 year later to 357 different adolescents in Year 10 in the same schools. Confirmatory factor analysis verified the two-factor solution. Females scored higher than males on both affective and cognitive empathy. Empathy was positively correlated with intelligence (for females only), extraversion (cognitive empathy only) neuroticism (affective empathy only), agreeableness, conscientiousness (for males only), and openness. Empathy was positively related to parental supervision and socioeconomic status. Adolescents who would help victims of bullying had high empathy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Emotion, regulation, and moral development.

            Research and theory on the role of emotion and regulation in morality have received considerable attention in the last decade. Much relevant work has concerned the role of moral emotions in moral behavior. Research on differences between embarrassment, guilt, and shame and their relations to moral behavior is reviewed, as is research on the association of these emotions with negative emotionality and regulation. Recent issues concerning the role of such empathy-related responses as sympathy and personal distress to prosocial and antisocial behavior are discussed, as is the relation of empathy-related responding to situational and dispositional emotionality and regulation. The development and socialization of guilt, shame, and empathy also are discussed briefly. In addition, the role of nonmoral emotions (e.g. anger and sadness), including moods and dispositional differences in negative emotionality and its regulation, in morally relevant behavior, is reviewed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              A New Scale for Measuring Adults' Prosocialness

              Abstract. In the present study, the authors proposed a novel self-report 16-item scale for assessing individual differences in adult prosocialness and tested its measurement properties by employing an item response theory (IRT) analysis of data collected from a sample of 2,574 Italian adults. Prior work employing classical psychometric methods of analysis had already established the reliability and validity of the instrument. The present study furthered this scrutiny by examining whether the different prosocialness items were equally effective in discriminating people and equally informative; it also examined gender differences in the functioning of the items. The results of IRT analyses strongly supported the measurement effectiveness and sensitivity of the 16 prosocialness items, and findings are discussed for their implications in behavioral assessment research on prosocialness.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                30 November 2020
                December 2020
                : 17
                : 23
                : 8914
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Providencia 7500912, Chile; ivan.suazo@ 123456uautonoma.cl
                [2 ]Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain; mpf421@ 123456ual.es (M.d.C.P.-F.); mmj130@ 123456ual.es (M.d.M.M.J.); amm521@ 123456ual.es (Á.M.M.); msm112@ 123456ual.es (M.d.M.S.M.); abm410@ 123456ual.es (A.B.B.M.); ms168@ 123456ual.es (M.S.)
                [3 ]Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Politécnica y Artística del Paraguay, Asunción 1628, Paraguay
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: jlinares@ 123456ual.es ; Tel.: +34-9-5001-5598
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1689-1632
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5950-5175
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-1474
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6794-3906
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8936-0245
                Article
                ijerph-17-08914
                10.3390/ijerph17238914
                7730362
                33266232
                23f6aa37-e02f-4c2f-b763-d4099537dc94
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 26 October 2020
                : 27 November 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                humanization,moral sensitivity,empathy,prosocial behavior,nursing care
                Public health
                humanization, moral sensitivity, empathy, prosocial behavior, nursing care

                Comments

                Comment on this article