2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model of oseltamivir phosphate and its carboxylate metabolite for rats and humans

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Oseltamivir phosphate (OP, Tamiflu®) is a widely used prodrug for the treatment of influenza viral infections. Orally administered OP is rapidly hydrolyzed by the carboxylesterases in animals to oseltamivir carboxylate (OC), a potent influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitor. The goals of this study were to develop and validate a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of OP/OC in rats and humans, and to predict the internal tissue doses for OP and OC in humans after receiving OP orally. To this end, a PBPK model of OP/OC was first developed in the rat, which was then scaled up to humans by replacing the physiological and biochemical parameters with human-specific values. The proposed PBPK model consisted of an OP and an OC sub-models each containing nine first-order, flow-limited tissue/organ compartments. OP metabolism to OC was assumed to carry out mainly by hepatic carboxylesterases although extra-hepatic metabolism also occurred especially in the plasma. The PBPK model was developed and validated by experimental data from our laboratories and from the literature. The proposed PBPK model accurately predicted the pharmacokinetic behavior of OP and OC in humans and rats after receiving a single or multiple doses of OP orally or an OC dose i.v. The PBPK model was used to predict the internal tissue doses of OP and OC in a hypothetical human after receiving the recommended dose of 75 mg/kg OP b.i.d. for 6 days. Steady-state OC concentrations in the plasma and major organs such as the lung and the brain were higher than the minimum in vitro IC50 reported for H1N1 influenza virus neuraminidase, confirming OP is an effective, anti-viral agent. OP side-effects in the gastrointestinal tract and brain of humans were explainable by the tissue doses found in these organs. The PBPK model provides a quantitative tool to evaluate the relationship between an externally applied dose of OP and the internal tissue doses in humans. As such the model can be used to adjust the dose regimens for adult patients in disease states e.g., renal failure and liver damage.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Physiological parameters in laboratory animals and humans.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Use of the oral neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir in experimental human influenza: randomized controlled trials for prevention and treatment.

            Influenza virus neuraminidase is thought to be essential for virus replication in humans; however, to date, available neuraminidase inhibitors are limited to zanamivir, which is topically administered. To determine the safety, tolerability, and antiviral activity of oral neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir (GS4104/Ro64-0796) for prevention and the early treatment of influenza in experimentally infected humans. Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials conducted between June and July 1997. Individual hotel rooms; 2 large US university medical schools. A total of 117 healthy adult volunteers (aged 18-40 years; median age, 21 years) who were susceptible (hemagglutination-inhibition antibody titer < or =1:8). All subjects were inoculated intranasally with influenza A/Texas/36/91 (H1N1) virus. For the prophylaxis study, oral oseltamivir (100 mg once daily [n = 12], 100 mg twice daily [n = 12], or matching placebo [n = 13], starting 26 hours before virus inoculation) was administered. For the treatment study, the same drug was given (20 mg, 100 mg, or 200 mg twice daily, 200 mg once daily, or matching placebo [n = 16], in each group starting 28 hours after inoculation). All regimens were continued for 5 days. Comparing placebo groups with pooled treatment groups, for prophylaxis, outcomes included frequency of infection and viral shedding; for treatment, viral shedding in titers. In the prophylaxis study, 8 (67%) of 12 placebo and 8 (38%) of 21 oseltamivir recipients became infected (P = .16; efficacy, 61%); 6 (50%) placebo compared with 0 oseltamivir recipients shed virus (P<.001; efficacy, 100%), and 33% of placebo but no oseltamivir recipient had infection-related respiratory illness (P<.01). Among infected subjects in the treatment study (n = 69), the viral titer area under the curve of the combined oseltamivir groups (n = 56) was lower (median [interquartile range [IQR]], 80 [23-151] vs 273 [79-306] log10 tissue culture-infective doses50 per milliliter x hour; P = .02) than the placebo group (n = 13), and the median (IQR) duration of viral shedding with therapy was reduced from 107 (83-131) to 58 (35-59) hours (P = .003). Oseltamivir treatment also reduced symptom scores (median [IQR] score-hours, 225 [97-349] vs 400 [189-645]; P = .05), and nasal proinflammatory cytokine levels. Transient mild to moderate nausea after dosing was observed in 15 (17%) of 88 oseltamivir and 2 (7%) of 29 placebo recipients (95% confidence interval for difference, -11% to 68%), which was largely prevented by ingestion with food. In these trials, prophylaxis and early treatment with oral oseltamivir were both associated with significant antiviral and clinical effects in experimental human influenza.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Methotrexate pharmacokinetics.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ADMET DMPK
                ADMET DMPK
                ADMET
                ADMET & DMPK
                International Association of Physical Chemists
                1848-7718
                23 February 2019
                2019
                : 7
                : 1
                : 22-43
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Drug Evaluation, China Food and Drug Administration , Beijing 100022, China
                [2 ]Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University , Burnaby, B.C. Canada V3N 4W8
                [3 ]Department of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University , Kowloon, Hong Kong. SAZ. China
                Author notes
                *Corresponding Author: E-mail: gaogh@ 123456cde.org.cn ; Tel.: 010-85243575
                Article
                10.5599/admet.628
                8957250
                2518d319-ac78-473d-ac40-8c83118bfa0b
                Copyright © 2018 by the authors.

                This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                : 30 October 2018
                : 31 January 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 10, Tables: 3, Equations: 19, References: 45, Pages: 22
                Categories
                Original Scientific Paper

                oseltamivir,physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling,tissue concentration,dose metrics

                Comments

                Comment on this article