0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Digital Facilitation of Group Work to Gain Predictable Performance

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Group work is a commonly used method of working, and the performance of a group can vary depending on the type and structure of the task at hand. Research suggests that groups can exhibit "collective intelligence"—the ability to perform well across tasks—under certain conditions, making group performance somewhat predictable. However, predictability of task performance becomes difficult when a task relies heavily on coordination among group members or is ill-defined. To address this issue, we propose a technical solution in the form of a chatbot providing advice to facilitate group work for more predictable performance. Specifically, we target well-defined, high-coordination tasks. Through experiments with 64 virtual groups performing various tasks and communicating via text-based chat, we found a relationship between the average intelligence of group members and their group performance in such tasks, making performance more predictable. The practical implications of this research are significant, as the assembly of consistently performing groups is an important organizational activity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references80

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          "General Intelligence," Objectively Determined and Measured

          C Spearman (1904)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants.

            Participant attentiveness is a concern for many researchers using Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Although studies comparing the attentiveness of participants on MTurk versus traditional subject pool samples have provided mixed support for this concern, attention check questions and other methods of ensuring participant attention have become prolific in MTurk studies. Because MTurk is a population that learns, we hypothesized that MTurkers would be more attentive to instructions than are traditional subject pool samples. In three online studies, participants from MTurk and collegiate populations participated in a task that included a measure of attentiveness to instructions (an instructional manipulation check: IMC). In all studies, MTurkers were more attentive to the instructions than were college students, even on novel IMCs (Studies 2 and 3), and MTurkers showed larger effects in response to a minute text manipulation. These results have implications for the sustainable use of MTurk samples for social science research and for the conclusions drawn from research with MTurk and college subject pool samples.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The interdisciplinary study of coordination

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Group Decision and Negotiation
                Group Decis Negot
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                0926-2644
                1572-9907
                February 2024
                October 20 2023
                February 2024
                : 33
                : 1
                : 113-145
                Article
                10.1007/s10726-023-09856-8
                2631388f-e3c8-4881-b9ce-f1ce91f78f55
                © 2024

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article