349
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes.

      Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Decision Making, Evidence-Based Medicine, standards, Female, Guideline Adherence, Humans, Male, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Practice Guidelines as Topic, Quality Assurance, Health Care

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          GRADE requires a clear specification of the relevant setting, population, intervention, and comparator. It also requires specification of all important outcomes--whether evidence from research studies is, or is not, available. For a particular management question, the population, intervention, and outcome should be sufficiently similar across studies that a similar magnitude of effect is plausible. Guideline developers should specify the relative importance of the outcomes before gathering the evidence and again when evidence summaries are complete. In considering the importance of a surrogate outcome, authors should rate the importance of the patient-important outcome for which the surrogate is a substitute and subsequently rate down the quality of evidence for indirectness of outcome. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article