10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Community engagement for the rapid elimination of malaria: the case of Kayin State, Myanmar

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Currently, malaria elimination efforts are ongoing in several locations across Southeast Asia,  including in Kayin State (also known as Karen State), Myanmar . This paper describes the community engagement efforts for a pilot malaria elimination project, the challenges encountered and lessons learnt.

          Methods: Between May 2013 and June 2015, a study on targeted malaria elimination (TME) that included mass drug administration was conducted in four villages (TPN, TOT, KNH, and HKT) of Kayin State. Community engagement efforts included workshops, meetings and house-to-house visits with community members.  Exhibitions related to malaria and fun activities were organized for children. In addition, we provided primary care, small individual incentives and village-level incentives. This paper is based on our analysis of data extracted from meeting minutes, field notes, feedback sessions among staff and with community members as well as our own reflections.

          Results: Average participation across three rounds of MDA were 84.4%, 57.4%, 88.6% and 59.3% for TPN, TOT, KNH and HKT, respectively. Community engagement was fraught with practical challenges such as seasonal tasks of the villagers. There were challenges in explaining difficult concepts like drug resistance and submicroscopic infection. Another was understanding and navigating the politics of these villages, which are located in politically contested areas.  Managing expectations of villagers was difficult as they assumed that the community team must know everything related to health.

          Conclusions: In the TME project, many different community engagement strategies were employed. We encountered many challenges which included logistical, scientific and political difficulties.  An approach that is tailored to the local population is key.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Towards a framework for community engagement in global health research.

          New technologies for global public health are spurring critical evaluations of the role of communities in research and what they receive in exchange for their participation. Community engagement activities resulting from these evaluations are most challenging for novel scientific ventures, particularly those involving controversial strategies and those in which some risks are poorly understood or determined. Remarkably, there is no explicit body of community engagement knowledge to which researchers can turn for guidance about approaches that are most likely to be effective in different contexts, and why. We describe here a framework that provides a starting point for broader discussions of community engagement in global health research, particularly as it relates to the development, evaluation and application of new technologies. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Community engagement and population coverage in mass anti-malarial administrations: a systematic literature review

            Background Mass anti-malarial administration has been proposed as a key component of the malaria elimination strategy in South East Asia. The success of this approach depends on the local malaria epidemiology, nature of the anti-malarial regimen and population coverage. Community engagement is used to promote population coverage but little research has systematically analysed its impact. This systematic review examines population coverage and community engagement in programmes of mass anti-malarial drug administration. Methods This review builds on a previous review that identified 3049 articles describing mass anti-malarial administrations published between 1913 and 2011. Further search and application of a set of criteria conducted in the current review resulted in 51 articles that were retained for analysis. These 51 papers described the population coverage and/or community engagement in mass anti-malarial administrations. Population coverage was quantitatively assessed and a thematic analysis was conducted on the community engagement activities. Results The studies were conducted in 26 countries: in diverse healthcare and social contexts where various anti-malarial regimens under varied study designs were administered. Twenty-eight articles reported only population coverage; 12 described only community engagement activities; and 11 community engagement and population coverage. Average population coverage was 83% but methods of calculating coverage were frequently unclear or inconsistent. Community engagement activities included providing health education and incentives, using community structures (e.g. existing hierarchies or health infrastructure), mobilizing human resources, and collaborating with government at some level (e.g. ministries of health). Community engagement was often a process involving various activities throughout the duration of the intervention. Conclusion The mean population coverage was over 80% but incomplete reporting of calculation methods limits conclusions and comparisons between studies. Various community engagement activities and approaches were described, but many articles contained limited or no details. Other factors relevant to population coverage, such as the social, cultural and study context were scarcely reported. Further research is needed to understand the factors that influence population coverage and adherence in mass anti-malarial administrations and the role community engagement activities and approaches play in satisfactory participation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-016-1593-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The role of early detection and treatment in malaria elimination

              Falciparum malaria persists in hard-to-reach areas or demographic groups that are missed by conventional healthcare systems but could be reached by trained community members in a malaria post (MP). The main focus of a MP is to provide uninterrupted and rapid access to rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) too all inhabitants of a village. RDTs allow trained community members to perform malaria diagnosis accurately and prescribe appropriate treatment, reducing as much as possible any delay between the onset of fever and treatment. Early treatment with ACT and with a low-dose of primaquine prevents further transmission from human to mosquito. A functioning MP represents an essential component of any malaria elimination strategy. Implementing large-scale, high-coverage, community-based early diagnosis and treatment through MPs requires few technological innovations but relies on a very well structured organization able to train, supervise and supply MPs, to monitor activity and to perform strict malaria surveillance. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-016-1399-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Project AdministrationRole: Supervision
                Role: InvestigationRole: Project Administration
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data CurationRole: Formal Analysis
                Role: Data CurationRole: Project Administration
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal AnalysisRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Project AdministrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data CurationRole: Formal AnalysisRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Journal
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Research
                F1000Research (London, UK )
                2398-502X
                28 July 2017
                2017
                : 2
                : 59
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mae Sot, Thailand
                [2 ]Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
                [3 ]Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [4 ]Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand
                [5 ]The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [1 ]Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Center for Ethics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
                [1 ]Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
                [2 ]Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
                Author notes

                Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: MLW and MORU are both partners in the Global Health Bioethics Network, and I collaborate with some of the article authors through this network.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5352-7338
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7951-0745
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6327-3266
                Article
                10.12688/wellcomeopenres.12051.1
                5580421
                28894847
                27ad3db5-8099-4a93-abf9-ee071ac57b94
                Copyright: © 2017 Kajeechiwa L et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 27 July 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust
                Award ID: 106698
                Award ID: 096527
                Award ID: 101148
                Funded by: Bill and Mellinda Gates Foundation
                Award ID: BMGFOPP1081420
                This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust [10669], [096527], [101148]; and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF OPP1081420).
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Articles
                Global Health
                Parasitology
                Social & Behavioral Determinants of Health

                community engagement,elimination,malaria,mass drug administration

                Comments

                Comment on this article