0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Fecal concentration of Rhodococcus equi determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction of rectal swab samples to differentiate foals with pneumonia from healthy foals

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Diagnostic accuracy of real‐time, quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays to quantify virulent Rhodococcus equi using rectal swab samples has not been systematically evaluated.

          Objective

          To evaluate the accuracy of qPCR of rectal swab samples to differentiate foals with pneumonia from healthy foals of similar age from the same environment.

          Animals

          One hundred privately owned foals born in 2021 from 2 farms in New York.

          Methods

          An incident case‐control study design was used. Rectal swabs were collected from all foals diagnosed with R. equi pneumonia at 2 horse‐breeding farms (n = 47). Eligible pneumonia cases (n = 39) were matched by age to up to 2 healthy (n = 53) control foals; rectal swabs were collected from control foals on the day of diagnosis of the index case. DNA was extracted from fecal swabs and the concentration of virulent R. equi (ie, copy numbers of the virulence‐associated protein A gene [ vapA] per 100 ng fecal DNA) was estimated by qPCR.

          Results

          The area under the ROC curve for qPCR of fecal swabs was 83.7% (95% CI, 74.9‐92.6). At a threshold of 14 883 copies of vapA per 100 ng fecal DNA, specificity of the assay was 83.0% (95% CI, 71.7‐92.4) and sensitivity was 79.5% (95% CI, 66.7‐92.3).

          Conclusions and Clinical Importance

          Although fecal concentrations of virulent R. equi are significantly higher in pneumonic foals than healthy foals of similar age in the same environment, qPCR of rectal swabs as reported here lacks adequate diagnostic accuracy for clinical use.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

          In 2003, the QUADAS tool for systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies was developed. Experience, anecdotal reports, and feedback suggested areas for improvement; therefore, QUADAS-2 was developed. This tool comprises 4 domains: patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing. Each domain is assessed in terms of risk of bias, and the first 3 domains are also assessed in terms of concerns regarding applicability. Signalling questions are included to help judge risk of bias. The QUADAS-2 tool is applied in 4 phases: summarize the review question, tailor the tool and produce review-specific guidance, construct a flow diagram for the primary study, and judge bias and applicability. This tool will allow for more transparent rating of bias and applicability of primary diagnostic accuracy studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review.

            Studies of diagnostic accuracy are subject to different sources of bias and variation than studies that evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention. Little is known about the effects of these sources of bias and variation. To summarize the evidence on factors that can lead to bias or variation in the results of diagnostic accuracy studies. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and BIOSIS, and the methodologic databases of the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and the Cochrane Collaboration. Methodologic experts in diagnostic tests were contacted. Studies that investigated the effects of bias and variation on measures of test performance were eligible for inclusion, which was assessed by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Data extraction was conducted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. The best-documented effects of bias and variation were found for demographic features, disease prevalence and severity, partial verification bias, clinical review bias, and observer and instrument variation. For other sources, such as distorted selection of participants, absent or inappropriate reference standard, differential verification bias, and review bias, the amount of evidence was limited. Evidence was lacking for other features, including incorporation bias, treatment paradox, arbitrary choice of threshold value, and dropouts. Many issues in the design and conduct of diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to bias or variation; however, the empirical evidence about the size and effect of these issues is limited.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              pROC: an open‐source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ncohen@cvm.tamu.edu
                Journal
                J Vet Intern Med
                J Vet Intern Med
                10.1111/(ISSN)1939-1676
                JVIM
                Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                0891-6640
                1939-1676
                27 April 2022
                May-Jun 2022
                : 36
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1111/jvim.v36.3 )
                : 1146-1151
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Equine Infectious Disease Laboratory, Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA
                [ 2 ] Rood & Riddle Equine Hospital in Saratoga Saratoga Springs New York USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Noah D. Cohen, Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, 660 Raymond Stotzer Parkway, College Station, TX 77843, USA.

                Email: ncohen@ 123456cvm.tamu.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0384-2903
                Article
                JVIM16438
                10.1111/jvim.16438
                9151472
                35475581
                28ed6a95-a7d3-4edb-b56e-6f97330f203d
                © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 04 April 2022
                : 18 February 2022
                : 12 April 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Pages: 6, Words: 5261
                Funding
                Funded by: Boehringer‐Ingelheim Animal Health (Advancement in Equine Research Award)
                Funded by: Link Equine Research Endowment, Texas A&M University, Equine Infectious Disease Epidemiology Program
                Categories
                Standard Article
                EQUINE
                Standard Articles
                Infectious Disease
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                May/June 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.6 mode:remove_FC converted:30.05.2022

                Veterinary medicine
                foals,infectious diseases,pcr assays,pneumonia,rhodococcus
                Veterinary medicine
                foals, infectious diseases, pcr assays, pneumonia, rhodococcus

                Comments

                Comment on this article