19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      CT-based Navigation System Using a Patient-Specific Instrument for Femoral Component Positioning: An Experimental in vitro Study with a Sawbone Model

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The intraoperative version of the femoral component is usually determined by visual appraisal of the stem position relative to the distal femoral condylar axis. However, several studies have suggested that a surgeon's visual assessment of the stem position has a high probability of misinterpretation. We developed a computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system with a patient-specific instrument (PSI) capable of three-dimensional (3D) printing and investigated its accuracy and consistency in comparison to the conventional technique of visual assessment of the stem position.

          Materials and Methods

          A CT scan of a femur sawbone model was performed, and pre-experimental planning was completed. We conducted 30 femoral neck osteotomies using the conventional technique and another 30 femoral neck osteotomies using the proposed technique. The femoral medullary canals were identified in both groups using a box chisel.

          Results

          For the absolute deviation between the measured and planned values, the mean two-dimensional anteversions of the proposed and conventional techniques were 1.41° and 4.78°, while their mean 3D anteversions were 1.15° and 3.31°. The mean θ 1, θ 2, θ 3, and d, all of which are parameters for evaluating femoral neck osteotomy, were 2.93°, 1.96°, 5.29°, and 0.48 mm for the proposed technique and 4.26°, 3.17°, 4.43°, and 3.15 mm for the conventional technique, respectively.

          Conclusion

          The CT-based navigation system with PSI was more accurate and consistent than the conventional technique for assessment of stem position. Therefore, it can be used to reduce the frequency of incorrect assessments of the stem position among surgeons and to help with accurate determination of stem anteversion.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

          In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analysed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty.

            Combined cup and stem anteversion in THA based on femoral anteversion has been suggested as a method to compensate for abnormal femoral anteversion. We investigated the combined anteversion technique using computer navigation. In 47 THAs, the surgeon first estimated the femoral broach anteversion and validated the position by computer navigation. The broach was then measured with navigation. The navigation screen was blocked while the surgeon estimated the anteversion of the broach. This provided two estimates of stem anteversion. The navigated stem anteversion was validated by postoperative CT scans. All cups were implanted using navigation alone. We determined precision (the reproducibility) and bias (how close the average test number is to the true value) of the stem position. Comparing the surgeon estimate to navigation anteversion, the precision of the surgeon was 16.8 degrees and bias was 0.2 degrees ; comparing the navigation of the stem to postoperative CT anteversion, the precision was 4.8 degrees and bias was 0.2 degrees , meaning navigation is accurate. Combined anteversion by postoperative CT scan was 37.6 degrees +/- 7 degrees (standard deviation) (range, 19 degrees -50 degrees ). The combined anteversion with computer navigation was within the safe zone of 25 degrees to 50 degrees for 45 of 47 (96%) hips. Femoral stem anteversion had a wide variability. Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty.

              The version of the acetabular and femoral components in 111 primary total hip arthroplasties was prospectively evaluated intraoperatively by the surgeon and compared with postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan measurements. Intraoperative estimations by the surgeons for acetabular and femoral components were all within 10 degrees to 30 degrees anteversion, with means of 16.0 degrees (SD = 4.0 degrees ) and 16.4 degrees (SD = 3.2 degrees ), respectively. However, CT scan acetabular measurements ranged from 12 degrees retroversion to 52 degrees anteversion (mean = 22.0 degrees anteversion, SD = 14.0 degrees ). Similarly, femoral component version ranged from -15 degrees retroversion to 45 degrees anteversion (mean = 16.8 degrees anteversion, SD = 11.1 degrees ). According to CT calculations, only 71% of femoral and 45% of acetabular components were within the expected clinical version range. In conclusion, the intraoperative estimation of acetabular and femoral version in a total hip arthroplasty is of limited accuracy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Yonsei Med J
                Yonsei Med. J
                YMJ
                Yonsei Medical Journal
                Yonsei University College of Medicine
                0513-5796
                1976-2437
                01 August 2018
                04 July 2018
                : 59
                : 6
                : 769-780
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Robotics Engineering, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology, Daegu, Korea.
                [2 ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daegu Catholic University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
                [3 ]Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Jun-Young Kim, MD, PhD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daegu Catholic University College of Medicine, 33 Duryugongwon-ro 17-gil, Nam-gu, Daegu 42472, Korea. Tel: 82-53-650-3067, Fax: 82-53-621-4487, dr.junyoung@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0488-8265
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4700-3041
                Article
                10.3349/ymj.2018.59.6.769
                6037596
                29978614
                2c4d9b9a-7ef7-4ba8-8eb6-c60e6d196afb
                © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2018

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 January 2018
                : 05 June 2018
                : 06 June 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, CrossRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003621;
                Award ID: R-20170419-001548
                Funded by: Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, CrossRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003052;
                Award ID: 10052980
                Categories
                Original Article
                Orthopedics & Rehabilitation

                Medicine
                total hip replacement,computer-assisted surgery,3d printing
                Medicine
                total hip replacement, computer-assisted surgery, 3d printing

                Comments

                Comment on this article