13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Experimental and Archaeological Verification of an Index of Retouch for Hafted Bifaces

      American Antiquity
      JSTOR

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The relative amount of retouch on stone tools is central to many archaeological studies linking stone tool assemblages to broader issues of human social and economic land-use strategies. Unfortunately, most retouch measures deal with flake and blade tools and few (if any) have been developed for hafted bifaces and projectile points. This paper introduces a new index for measuring and comparing amount of retouch on hafted bifaces and projectile points that can be applied regardless of size or typological variance. The retouch index is assessed initially with an experimental data set of hafted bifaces that were dulled and resharpened on five occasions. The retouch index is then applied to a hafted biface assemblage made from tool stone that has been sourced by X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF). Results of both assessments show that the hafted biface retouch index (HRI) is effective for determining the amount of retouch and the degree to which the hafted bifaces have been curated.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Willow Smoke and Dogs' Tails: Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems and Archaeological Site Formation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Organization and Formation Processes: Looking at Curated Technologies

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Technological Efficiency and Tool Curation

              Archaeologists frequently explain tool curation by its efficiency. Such explanations ignore the fact that curation is a complex activity and that its component parts are efficient in different ways. I argue that the nature and distribution of lithic resources critically affect technological efficiency and I discuss two aspects of curation, maintenance and recycling, asserting that they are responses to raw material shortages. Shortages result from regional geological conditions and from behavior patterns that restrict access to raw material in certain contexts. Ethnographic and archaeological examples support this hypothesis and highlight the relationship between subsistence-settlement organization, raw material distribution, and technology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                applab
                American Antiquity
                Am. antiq.
                JSTOR
                0002-7316
                October 2006
                January 20 2017
                : 71
                : 04
                : 743-757
                Article
                10.2307/40035887
                2c8d80f2-858d-4b94-adf0-206c2774aab3
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article