89
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Super-resolution biomolecular crystallography with low-resolution data

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          X-ray diffraction plays a pivotal role in understanding of biological systems by revealing atomic structures of proteins, nucleic acids, and their complexes, with much recent interest in very large assemblies like the ribosome. Since crystals of such large assemblies often diffract weakly (resolution worse than 4 Å), we need methods that work at such low resolution. In macromolecular assemblies, some of the components may be known at high resolution, while others are unknown: current refinement methods fail as they require a high-resolution starting structure for the entire complex 1. Determining such complexes, which are often of key biological importance, should be possible in principle as the number of independent diffraction intensities at a resolution below 5 Å generally exceed the number of degrees of freedom. Here we introduce a new method that adds specific information from known homologous structures but allows global and local deformations of these homology models. Our approach uses the observation that local protein structure tends to be conserved as sequence and function evolve. Cross-validation with R free determines the optimum deformation and influence of the homology model. For test cases at 3.5 – 5 Å resolution with known structures at high resolution, our method gives significant improvements over conventional refinement in the model coordinate accuracy, the definition of secondary structure, and the quality of electron density maps. For re-refinements of a representative set of 19 low-resolution crystal structures from the PDB, we find similar improvements. Thus, a structure derived from low-resolution diffraction data can have quality similar to a high-resolution structure. Our method is applicable to studying weakly diffracting crystals using X-ray micro-diffraction 2 as well as data from new X-ray light sources 3. Use of homology information is not restricted to X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy: as optical imaging advances to sub-nanometer resolution 4, 5, it can use similar tools.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Version 1.2 of the Crystallography and NMR system.

          Version 1.2 of the software system, termed Crystallography and NMR system (CNS), for crystallographic and NMR structure determination has been released. Since its first release, the goals of CNS have been (i) to create a flexible computational framework for exploration of new approaches to structure determination, (ii) to provide tools for structure solution of difficult or large structures, (iii) to develop models for analyzing structural and dynamical properties of macromolecules and (iv) to integrate all sources of information into all stages of the structure determination process. Version 1.2 includes an improved model for the treatment of disordered solvent for crystallographic refinement that employs a combined grid search and least-squares optimization of the bulk solvent model parameters. The method is more robust than previous implementations, especially at lower resolution, generally resulting in lower R values. Other advances include the ability to apply thermal factor sharpening to electron density maps. Consistent with the modular design of CNS, these additions and changes were implemented in the high-level computing language of CNS.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The PyMol molecular graphics system

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Structural definition of a conserved neutralization epitope on HIV-1 gp120

              The remarkable diversity, glycosylation and conformational flexibility of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope (Env), including substantial rearrangement of the gp120 glycoprotein upon binding the CD4 receptor, allow it to evade antibody-mediated neutralization. Despite this complexity, the HIV-1 Env must retain conserved determinants that mediate CD4 binding. To evaluate how these determinants might provide opportunities for antibody recognition, we created variants of gp120 stabilized in the CD4-bound state, assessed binding of CD4 and of receptor-binding-site antibodies, and determined the structure at 2.3 Å resolution of the broadly neutralizing antibody b12 in complex with gp120. b12 binds to a conformationally invariant surface that overlaps a distinct subset of the CD4-binding site. This surface is involved in the metastable attachment of CD4, before the gp120 rearrangement required for stable engagement. A site of vulnerability, related to a functional requirement for efficient association with CD4, can therefore be targeted by antibody to neutralize HIV-1. Supplementary information The online version of this article (doi:10.1038/nature05580) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                18 February 2010
                7 April 2010
                22 April 2010
                22 October 2010
                : 464
                : 7292
                : 1218-1222
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Institut für Strukturbiologie und Biophysik (ISB-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
                [2 ] Department of Structural Biology, Stanford School of Medicine, D100 Fairchild Building, 299 W Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305
                [3 ] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and Departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Neurology and Neurological Sciences, and Photon Science, Stanford University, James H. Clark Center E300, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding Authors: gu.schroeder@ 123456fz-juelich.de , +49-2461-61-3259, brunger@ 123456stanford.edu , +1-650-736-1031
                Article
                hhmipa178417
                10.1038/nature08892
                2859093
                20376006
                2df2469d-4a42-4da6-85c2-e365c7ea58ad

                Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Howard Hughes Medical Institute
                Award ID: ||HHMI_
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                rfree value,refinement,x-ray crystallography,homology modeling,cross-validation
                Uncategorized
                rfree value, refinement, x-ray crystallography, homology modeling, cross-validation

                Comments

                Comment on this article