10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The pollination ecology of durian ( Durio zibethinus, Bombacaceae) in southern Thailand

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract:

          The floral biology and pollination ecology of durian, Durio zibethinus, were determined in eight semi-wild trees in mixed-fruit orchards in southern Thailand during April-May 2003 and 2005. Flowers open fully at 16h00–16h30 and most androecia drop around 01h00. Anthers dehisce at 19h30–20h00 when the stigmata are already receptive. In a series of pollination experiments, fruit was set in all treatments within 10 d. The greatest pollination success occurred after hand-crossed (76.6%), open (54.4%) and emasculation pollination (53.3%). Consistently, hand-crossed (12.2%), emasculation (8.7%) and open pollination (5.1%) yielded a substantial fruit set 2 mo after the pollination experiments. Very low pollination success in facilitated autogamy suggests that most durian trees are highly self incompatible. No mature fruit was found after insect pollination and automatic autogamy. Fruit bats, especially Eonycteris spelaea, are the major pollinators of this durian although the giant honey bee ( Apis dorsata) was the most frequent visitor to the flowers. Bats visited durian flowers at the rate of 26.1 (SD = 20.7) visits per inflorescence per night. Since this semi-wild durian depends on fruit bats as its pollinator, protecting fruit bat populations and their roosts is vital for the production of the durian fruit crop.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Economic Impacts of Pollinator Declines: An Approach to Assessing the Consequences

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Foraging Behavior of Malaysian Nectar-Feeding Bats

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The pollination ecology of two species of Parkia (Mimosaceae) in southern Thailand

              Abstract: Although the floral traits of Parkia conform to the bat-pollination syndrome, many visitors other than bats have been observed at their flowers. Some chiropterophilous plants are also pollinated by other animals; the syndrome is therefore best regarded as a hypothesis for which field observations and pollination experiments are required. The present study aimed, for the first time, to determine the breeding system of the economically important canopy trees, Parkia speciosa and P. timoriana , and to identify their pollinators. Pollination experiments carried out in Trang and Songkhla Provinces, in 28 trees of P. speciosa and four P. timoriana indicated that they are self incompatible. Open pollination resulted in the highest fruit set (average 60–67% of inflorescences per tree) although this was not significantly different from hand-crossed pollination (48–60%). Insect pollination resulted in fruit set in only 12% of P. speciosa inflorescences. Fruit bats, mainly Eonycteris spelaea , visit flowering plants continuously from dusk till after midnight. Nocturnal and diurnal insects (moths and stingless bees respectively) visit capitula, mostly at the nectar zone. Nectarivorous bats are the most effective pollinator for P. speciosa and P. timoriana . The fact that populations of E. spelaea appear to be declining throughout their distribution is therefore a matter of increasing concern.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                applab
                Journal of Tropical Ecology
                J. Trop. Ecol.
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                0266-4674
                1469-7831
                January 2009
                December 15 2008
                : 25
                : 01
                : 85-92
                Article
                10.1017/S0266467408005531
                314a68c1-f6a0-4d3c-acfc-fc56f65dc88f
                © 2008
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article