38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Surprised at All the Entropy: Hippocampal, Caudate and Midbrain Contributions to Learning from Prediction Errors

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Influential concepts in neuroscientific research cast the brain a predictive machine that revises its predictions when they are violated by sensory input. This relates to the predictive coding account of perception, but also to learning. Learning from prediction errors has been suggested for take place in the hippocampal memory system as well as in the basal ganglia. The present fMRI study used an action-observation paradigm to investigate the contributions of the hippocampus, caudate nucleus and midbrain dopaminergic system to different types of learning: learning in the absence of prediction errors, learning from prediction errors, and responding to the accumulation of prediction errors in unpredictable stimulus configurations. We conducted analyses of the regions of interests' BOLD response towards these different types of learning, implementing a bootstrapping procedure to correct for false positives. We found both, caudate nucleus and the hippocampus to be activated by perceptual prediction errors. The hippocampal responses seemed to relate to the associative mismatch between a stored representation and current sensory input. Moreover, its response was significantly influenced by the average information, or Shannon entropy of the stimulus material. In accordance with earlier results, the habenula was activated by perceptual prediction errors. Lastly, we found that the substantia nigra was activated by the novelty of sensory input. In sum, we established that the midbrain dopaminergic system, the hippocampus, and the caudate nucleus were to different degrees significantly involved in the three different types of learning: acquisition of new information, learning from prediction errors and responding to unpredictable stimulus developments. We relate learning from perceptual prediction errors to the concept of predictive coding and related information theoretic accounts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A framework for mesencephalic dopamine systems based on predictive Hebbian learning.

          We develop a theoretical framework that shows how mesencephalic dopamine systems could distribute to their targets a signal that represents information about future expectations. In particular, we show how activity in the cerebral cortex can make predictions about future receipt of reward and how fluctuations in the activity levels of neurons in diffuse dopamine systems above and below baseline levels would represent errors in these predictions that are delivered to cortical and subcortical targets. We present a model for how such errors could be constructed in a real brain that is consistent with physiological results for a subset of dopaminergic neurons located in the ventral tegmental area and surrounding dopaminergic neurons. The theory also makes testable predictions about human choice behavior on a simple decision-making task. Furthermore, we show that, through a simple influence on synaptic plasticity, fluctuations in dopamine release can act to change the predictions in an appropriate manner.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reward representations and reward-related learning in the human brain: insights from neuroimaging.

            This review outlines recent findings from human neuroimaging concerning the role of a highly interconnected network of brain areas including orbital and medial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, striatum and dopaminergic mid-brain in reward processing. Distinct reward-related functions can be attributed to different components of this network. Orbitofrontal cortex is involved in coding stimulus reward value and in concert with the amygdala and ventral striatum is implicated in representing predicted future reward. Such representations can be used to guide action selection for reward, a process that depends, at least in part, on orbital and medial prefrontal cortex as well as dorsal striatum.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system.

              Is it possible to understand the intentions of other people by simply observing their actions? Many believe that this ability is made possible by the brain's mirror neuron system through its direct link between action and observation. However, precisely how intentions can be inferred through action observation has provoked much debate. Here we suggest that the function of the mirror system can be understood within a predictive coding framework that appeals to the statistical approach known as empirical Bayes. Within this scheme the most likely cause of an observed action can be inferred by minimizing the prediction error at all levels of the cortical hierarchy that are engaged during action observation. This account identifies a precise role for the mirror system in our ability to infer intentions from actions and provides the outline of the underlying computational mechanisms.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2012
                3 May 2012
                : 7
                : 5
                : e36445
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Motor Cognition Group, Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research, Cologne, Germany
                [3 ]Institut für Psychologie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Germany
                [4 ]Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Mattarello, Italy
                Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Germany
                Author notes

                Conceived and designed the experiments: AMS CA RIS. Performed the experiments: AMS CA. Analyzed the data: AMS CA MFW. Wrote the paper: AMS.

                Article
                PONE-D-12-00468
                10.1371/journal.pone.0036445
                3343024
                22570715
                33179e54-b747-426c-84c8-4670446207b5
                Schiffer et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 4 January 2012
                : 4 April 2012
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Computational Biology
                Computational Neuroscience
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Neuroscience
                Cognition
                Neurochemistry
                Neurochemicals
                Dopamine
                Neuroimaging
                Fmri
                Learning and Memory
                Sensory Perception
                Medicine
                Mental Health
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Social and Behavioral Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article