3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A lower threshold for revision of aseptic unicompartmental vs total knee arthroplasty.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          It has been hypothesized that a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is more likely to be revised than a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) because conversion surgery to a primary TKA is a less complicated procedure. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a lower threshold for revising a UKA compared with TKA based on Oxford Knee Scores (OKSs) and range of movement (ROM) at the time of revision.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Bone Joint J
          The bone & joint journal
          British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
          2049-4408
          2049-4394
          Jun 2020
          : 102-B
          : 6_Supple_A
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
          Article
          10.1302/0301-620X.102B6.BJJ-2019-1538.R1
          32475288
          336eb405-7816-440e-86e9-92f412867f90
          History

          Revision knee,Oxford Knee Score,Unicompartmental knee

          Comments

          Comment on this article