69
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Inhibition of Protease-Activated Receptor 1 Does not Affect Dendritic Homeostasis of Cultured Mouse Dentate Granule Cells

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Protease-activated receptors (PARs) are widely expressed in the central nervous system (CNS). While a firm link between PAR1-activation and functional synaptic and intrinsic neuronal properties exists, studies on the role of PAR1 in neural structural plasticity are scarce. The physiological function of PAR1 in the brain remains not well understood. We here sought to determine whether prolonged pharmacologic PAR1-inhibition affects dendritic morphologies of hippocampal neurons. To address this question we employed live-cell microscopy of mouse dentate granule cell dendrites in 3-week old entorhino-hippocampal slice cultures prepared from Thy1-GFP mice. A subset of cultures were treated with the PAR1-inhibitor SCH79797 (1 μM; up to 3 weeks). No major effects of PAR1-inhibition on static and dynamic parameters of dentate granule cell dendrites were detected under control conditions. Granule cells of PAR1-deficient slice cultures showed unaltered dendritic morphologies, dendritic spine densities and excitatory synaptic strength. Furthermore, we report that PAR1-inhibition does not prevent dendritic retraction following partial deafferentation in vitro. Consistent with this finding, no major changes in PAR1-mRNA levels were detected in the denervated dentate gyrus (DG). We conclude that neural PAR1 is not involved in regulating the steady-state dynamics or deafferentation-induced adaptive changes of cultured dentate granule cell dendrites. These results indicate that drugs targeting neural PAR1-signals may not affect the stability and structural integrity of neuronal networks in healthy brain regions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Thrombin signalling and protease-activated receptors.

          S Coughlin (2000)
          How does the coagulation protease thrombin regulate cellular behaviour? The protease-activated receptors (PARs) provide one answer. In concert with the coagulation cascade, these receptors provide an elegant mechanism linking mechanical information in the form of tissue injury or vascular leakage to cellular responses. Roles for PARs are beginning to emerge in haemostasis and thrombosis, inflammation, and perhaps even blood vessel development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Network dysfunction after traumatic brain injury.

            Diffuse axonal injury after traumatic brain injury (TBI) produces neurological impairment by disconnecting brain networks. This structural damage can be mapped using diffusion MRI, and its functional effects can be investigated in large-scale intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs). Here, we review evidence that TBI substantially disrupts ICN function, and that this disruption predicts cognitive impairment. We focus on two ICNs--the salience network and the default mode network. The activity of these ICNs is normally tightly coupled, which is important for attentional control. Damage to the structural connectivity of these networks produces predictable abnormalities of network function and cognitive control. For example, the brain normally shows a 'small-world architecture' that is optimized for information processing, but TBI shifts network function away from this organization. The effects of TBI on network function are likely to be complex, and we discuss how advanced approaches to modelling brain dynamics can provide insights into the network dysfunction. We highlight how structural network damage caused by axonal injury might interact with neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease and chronic traumatic encephalopathy, which are late complications of TBI. Finally, we discuss how network-level diagnostics could inform diagnosis, prognosis and treatment development following TBI.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Role of matrix metalloproteinases in delayed cortical responses after stroke.

              Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are zinc-endopeptidases with multifactorial actions in central nervous system (CNS) physiology and pathology. Accumulating data suggest that MMPs have a deleterious role in stroke. By degrading neurovascular matrix, MMPs promote injury of the blood-brain barrier, edema and hemorrhage. By disrupting cell-matrix signaling and homeostasis, MMPs trigger brain cell death. Hence, there is a movement toward the development of MMP inhibitors for acute stroke therapy. But MMPs may have a different role during delayed phases after stroke. Because MMPs modulate brain matrix, they may mediate beneficial plasticity and remodeling during stroke recovery. Here, we show that MMPs participate in delayed cortical responses after focal cerebral ischemia in rats. MMP-9 is upregulated in peri-infarct cortex at 7-14 days after stroke and is colocalized with markers of neurovascular remodeling. Treatment with MMP inhibitors at 7 days after stroke suppresses neurovascular remodeling, increases ischemic brain injury and impairs functional recovery at 14 days. MMP processing of bioavailable VEGF may be involved because inhibition of MMPs reduces endogenous VEGF signals, whereas additional treatment with exogenous VEGF prevents MMP inhibitor-induced worsening of infarction. These data suggest that, contrary to MMP inhibitor therapies for acute stroke, strategies that modulate MMPs may be needed for promoting stroke recovery.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neuroanat
                Front Neuroanat
                Front. Neuroanat.
                Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5129
                13 June 2016
                2016
                : 10
                : 64
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Institute of Clinical Neuroanatomy, Neuroscience Center, Goethe-University Frankfurt Frankfurt, Germany
                [2] 2Institute of Anatomy II, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf, Germany
                [3] 3Department of Neurology, The Sagol Center for Neurosciences, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel
                [4] 4Talpiot Medical Leadership Program, Department of Neurology and J. Sagol Neuroscience Center, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center Tel HaShomer, Israel
                [5] 5Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel
                Author notes

                Edited by: Yun-Qing Li, The Fourth Military Medical University, China

                Reviewed by: Alberto Granato, Catholic University, Italy; Elena Isaeva, Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, Ukraine

                *Correspondence: Andreas Vlachos andreas.vlachos@ 123456med.uni-duesseldorf.de
                Article
                10.3389/fnana.2016.00064
                4904007
                27378862
                3508d88c-8695-475f-97e5-47dd7ee36b33
                Copyright © 2016 Schuldt, Galanis, Strehl, Hick, Schiener, Lenz, Deller, Maggio and Vlachos.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 24 March 2016
                : 27 May 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 74, Pages: 13, Words: 8573
                Funding
                Funded by: German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development 10.13039/501100001736
                Award ID: GIF G-1317-418.13/2015
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Original Research

                Neurosciences
                hippocampus,entorhinal cortex lesion,brain injury,coagulation,thrombin
                Neurosciences
                hippocampus, entorhinal cortex lesion, brain injury, coagulation, thrombin

                Comments

                Comment on this article