5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      N-Terminal Ubiquitination of Amyloidogenic Proteins Triggers Removal of Their Oligomers by the Proteasome Holoenzyme

      brief-report
      1 , 2 , 3 , , 2 , 4 , 1
      Journal of Molecular Biology
      Elsevier

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aggregation of amyloidogenic proteins is an abnormal biological process implicated in neurodegenerative disorders. Whereas the aggregation process of amyloid-forming proteins has been studied extensively, the mechanism of aggregate removal is poorly understood. We recently demonstrated that proteasomes could fragment filamentous aggregates into smaller entities, restricting aggregate size [ 1]. Here, we show in vitro that UBE2W can modify the N-terminus of both α-synuclein and a tau tetra-repeat domain with a single ubiquitin. We demonstrate that an engineered N-terminal ubiquitin modification changes the aggregation process of both proteins, resulting in the formation of structurally distinct aggregates. Single-molecule approaches further reveal that the proteasome can target soluble oligomers assembled from ubiquitin-modified proteins independently of its peptidase activity, consistent with our recently reported fibril-fragmenting activity. Based on these results, we propose that proteasomes are able to target oligomers assembled from N-terminally ubiquitinated proteins. Our data suggest a possible disassembly mechanism by which N-terminal ubiquitination and the proteasome may together impede aggregate formation.

          Graphical abstract

          Highlights

          • Amyloid proteins α-synuclein and tau K18 can be ubiquitinated by UBE2W.

          • N-terminal ubiquitin modification on amyloid proteins delays aggregation.

          • Proteasomes can remove N-terminal ubiquitin-modified oligomers.

          • Proteasomes remove oligomers primarily by enabling their dissociation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          UbiSite approach for comprehensive mapping of lysine and N-terminal ubiquitination sites

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            CHIP and Hsp70 regulate tau ubiquitination, degradation and aggregation.

            Molecular chaperones, ubiquitin ligases and proteasome impairment have been implicated in several neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, which are characterized by accumulation of abnormal protein aggregates (e.g. tau and alpha-synuclein respectively). Here we report that CHIP, an ubiquitin ligase that interacts directly with Hsp70/90, induces ubiquitination of the microtubule associated protein, tau. CHIP also increases tau aggregation. Consistent with this observation, diverse of tau lesions in human postmortem tissue were found to be immunopositive for CHIP. Conversely, induction of Hsp70 through treatment with either geldanamycin or heat shock factor 1 leads to a decrease in tau steady-state levels and a selective reduction in detergent insoluble tau. Furthermore, 30-month-old mice overexpressing inducible Hsp70 show a significant reduction in tau levels. Together these data demonstrate that the Hsp70/CHIP chaperone system plays an important role in the regulation of tau turnover and the selective elimination of abnormal tau species. Hsp70/CHIP may therefore play an important role in the pathogenesis of tauopathies and also represents a potential therapeutic target.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mechanisms and Functions of Spatial Protein Quality Control.

              A healthy proteome is essential for cell survival. Protein misfolding is linked to a rapidly expanding list of human diseases, ranging from neurodegenerative diseases to aging and cancer. Many of these diseases are characterized by the accumulation of misfolded proteins in intra- and extracellular inclusions, such as amyloid plaques. The clear link between protein misfolding and disease highlights the need to better understand the elaborate machinery that manages proteome homeostasis, or proteostasis, in the cell. Proteostasis depends on a network of molecular chaperones and clearance pathways involved in the recognition, refolding, and/or clearance of aberrant proteins. Recent studies reveal that an integral part of the cellular management of misfolded proteins is their spatial sequestration into several defined compartments. Here, we review the properties, function, and formation of these compartments. Spatial sequestration plays a central role in protein quality control and cellular fitness and represents a critical link to the pathogenesis of protein aggregation-linked diseases. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Biochemistry Volume 86 is June 20, 2017. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Mol Biol
                J. Mol. Biol
                Journal of Molecular Biology
                Elsevier
                0022-2836
                1089-8638
                17 January 2020
                17 January 2020
                : 432
                : 2
                : 585-596
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
                [2 ]Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK
                [3 ]UK Dementia Research Institute at Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK
                [4 ]UK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author: UK Dementia Research Institute at Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK yu.ye1@ 123456imperial.ac.uk
                Article
                S0022-2836(19)30545-5
                10.1016/j.jmb.2019.08.021
                6990400
                31518613
                353b30dd-b11c-4a0a-893c-6aa6fc6e480a
                © 2019 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 19 June 2019
                : 29 August 2019
                : 30 August 2019
                Categories
                Article

                Molecular biology
                Molecular biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article